54 pages • 1-hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Content Warning: This section of the guide includes discussion of death, ableism, and bullying.
In A Kind of Spark, the protagonist, who has autism, experiences intense displays of prejudice and injustice from peers and authority figures alike, and her everyday experience of the world includes enduring frequent bullying from those whose responsibility is to help her and protect her from such mistreatment. The novel explicitly emphasizes this systemic injustice by opening with the scene in which Addie’s teacher, Ms. Murphy, tears up the protagonist’s handwritten story and berates her for messy handwriting, labeling her “lazy” and failing to realize that Addie’s handwriting is a side effect of her challenges with motor skills. The incident also introduces the intensity of Addie’s sensory differences, especially when she observes, “The sound of the paper being torn is overly loud. Right in my ears. The characters in the story I was writing beg her to stop, but she doesn’t” (7). Addie’s visceral reaction to her teacher’s misguided scolding highlights the varied manifestations of the protagonist’s autism, illustrating her differences in sensory perception and employing personification to show her emotional connection to the characters in her shredded story. Most importantly, however, the author uses the scene to criticize the ableist assumption that a person who cannot perform tasks to a neurotypical standard must be “lazy.” The reality is that Addie’s struggles with handwriting do not arise from apathy or self-absorption; her motor functions are objectively impacted by her autism. Ms. Murphy has no interest in accommodating Addie’s differences.
While Keedie later tells Addie that Ms. Murphy is in the wrong, Addie remains unaware of this fact when she is caught in the midst of the conflict itself. By starting the novel this way, the author shows that even the truth of a situation can be muddied by the emotional response that such mistreatment creates in its target. Although Addie comes to understand that the behavior of her teacher and her classmates is morally wrong, her social isolation causes her to internalize the interaction and blame herself instead. In this context, Keedie’s determination to advocate for her younger sister demonstrates the importance of normalizing the specialized needs of those with autism so that the fabric of society itself can be influenced in a more positive direction.
Keedie’s protective actions are also influenced by her own past experience with discrimination; she also faced extensive ableism in school, sometimes to an even higher degree than Addie. She is also haunted by the fact that her friend Bonnie, who also has autism, was placed in a mental health facility because of her disability. Keedie reacted to this development by learning to mask the external manifestations of her autism and mold her behavior to an unrealistic neurotypical standard. This largely unconscious practice allows her to fit in but also has the devastating effect of triggering intense exhaustion and autistic burnout, a pattern that reaches crisis levels in the narrative’s climax. Her use of social masking to blend in and keep herself safe sends mixed signals to Addie, whom she often encourages to be proud of her identity despite her own inability to do so.
In some ways, Keedie’s ambiguous attitude toward her autism parallels Emily’s embarrassment over her reading difficulty; however, rather than finding constructive ways to deal with this challenge, Emily projects her negative feelings toward herself onto others instead, bullying Addie incessantly with ableist comments. Thus, the author develops characters whose disparate responses to disability illustrate a multitude of real-life dynamics around this topic. The characters’ interactions act as a primer and a critique, showing that harmful cultural attitudes toward individuals with disabilities can have wide-reaching social consequences. As McNicoll very carefully presents the pros and cons of each character’s choices, it becomes clear that even Addie, who accepts her identity more fully than others, faces unfair conflict because of her autism, and her struggles offer a realistic and complex look at the real challenges that people with disabilities face.
Luckily, there are people in Addie’s life who recognize the impact of her disability and strive to help her feel included and appreciated for her differences. Most notably, the highly empathic Audrey becomes a staunch ally when she disapproves of the poor treatment that Addie receives from others at school and takes action to counter this trend. She also makes an effort to ask Addie about her autism and her special interests, seeking to gain a greater understanding. This open show of support allows Addie to see that her autism is simply a part of who she is; it is not just a disorder but an innate attribute that other people can appreciate and accommodate in the same way that they respect other aspects of her personality. In the novel’s conclusion, Addie delivers an impassioned speech to the town council and declares her autism outright, explaining that although her neurotype comes with some differences, these differences are valuable and can lead to great things:
‘My autism isn’t always my superpower. Sometimes it’s difficult. But on the days when I’m finding electricity in things, seeing the details that others might not, I like it a lot.’ I realize I’ve reached an end. And I feel good, no matter what is decided. ‘I like myself the way I am. A lot’ (129).
By airing her ideas in this public forum, Addie contributes greatly to her community, working to counteract the ingrained prejudices against people who have autism. Having gained self-acceptance and the active support of her friends and loved ones, she represents neurodivergent people who struggle to operate in a society that marginalizes and discounts them.
The Scottish witch trials become a central image in the novel, and this historical period of persecution comes to represent the systemic oppression and injustice that all marginalized individuals face. Because many of these people were targeted simply because they were different, Addie feels a sharp kinship with them, recognizing that she is also ridiculed, shunned, and demonized by peers and authority figures alike because her lived experience differs from that of neurotypical people.
When Addie’s callous and judgmental teacher, Ms. Murphy, explains that Scottish women were thrown into the loch as part of the witch trials, Addie’s strong sense of justice and fairness—a classic autistic trait—becomes triggered. She is aghast at the injustice of the witch trials that created a cruel catch-22 for the accused women, who were deemed innocent if they sank and drowned but were executed as witches if they floated. Furthermore, when Ms. Murphy explains that the only way for the women of this time period to avoid persecution was to avoid standing out, this unwinnable situation horrifies Addie, who already experiences a degree of persecution from Ms. Murphy and the class. The author’s deliberate parallels between Addie and the historical “witches” are further cemented when Emily jokes that Addie would have been tried as a witch. Fueled by her need to seek some form of justice for the women (and, by extension, for herself), Addie researches the witches and brings a proposal to the town council to erect a memorial acknowledging the persecution of the condemned women. Her town’s immediate refusal only strengthens her desire to achieve her goa.
During a field trip to learn about the witch trials, Addie becomes overstimulated and has a meltdown, and the author describes the problematic attitude of Addie’s teacher in order to emphasize the broader importance of Combating Prejudice Against Neurodiversity. Just like the witches, Addie stands out, becoming vulnerable to persecution from Ms. Murphy. When the field trip guide tells the story of Mary, a woman with an unspecified disability who was executed as a witch despite being unable to defend herself, Addie’s heightened empathy combines with her sensory challenges to overwhelm her and trigger a meltdown. Ms. Murphy condemns the resulting disruption rather than supporting Addie’s needs. Having failed to develop a more deeply informed, compassionate approach, Ms. Muphy engages in outright cruelty and humiliates the protagonist, exacerbating the prejudice that Addie frequently experiences in public spaces that become too overwhelming to handle.
Importantly, this scene also highlights the phenomenon of autistic masking, in which people with autism either consciously or unconsciously seek to conceal the outward manifestations of their neurodivergence and behave as a neurotypical person would. While masking can help people with autism navigate the vagaries of the social world, hiding the essence of one’s true self is an inherently exhausting and demoralizing practice, and Addie’s exchange with the field trip guide explicitly demonstrates these issues. When the field trip guide insensitively calls the accused woman an “imbecile” who would now be referred to as having “special needs,” Addie retorts, “Like me. She was like me. […] I am not an imbecile” (48). To make her point more forcefully, she “force[s] herself to make eye contact with him, something [she] hate[s], something that feels unnatural and painful” (48). This interaction shows that even when Addie is being insulted, she is forced to mask and operate like a neurotypical person in order to make her point to the man, whose narrow idea of people with disabilities fueled his ableist comment. The exchange feels wrong and exhausting to her on every level, yet she must defend herself alone, just like the women condemned as witches.
Addie’s anxiety about the Scottish witch trials also parallels her fears about the fate of Keedie’s friend Bonnie, who was put into a mental health facility because of her autism. While some characters dismiss Addie’s passion about the trials, which happened centuries ago, the intensity of Addie’s interest lies in her awareness that people’s behavior still reflects the attitude of persecution that dominated that earlier time frame. Specifically, Addie is keenly aware that being different caused Bonnie to be marginalized, mistreated, and relegated to a largely indifferent institution. She therefore draws a connection between the witches and herself, and her innate sense of justice compels her to draw attention to the plight of marginalized people who once suffered as she does. When Keedie questions why the memorial is so important, Addie asserts, “Because it scares me, Keedie. If they don’t see it’s wrong, if they don’t say it’s wrong, it can happen again. It could happen to you; it could happen to me” (96). In a sense, Addie’s prediction comes true when Emily defaces her thesaurus, as all the other students simply stand and watch as this happens, even though they know Emily’s actions to be wrong. The author draws a direct comparison between the students’ inaction and the indifference of the condemned women’s neighbors when the women were dragged away to be tried as witches. Noting the similarities, Addie concludes that sometimes people stand by and condone injustice because they place a greater value on conforming to society’s norms and avoiding trouble themselves. She realizes that silence and inaction are both tacit forms of approval for injustice, and she therefore makes her case to the town council, seeking to honor the women who lost their lives to ignorant persecution. During her presentation, she draws a direct comparison between herself and the accused women, and her sympathetic and earnest appeal draws people to her cause.
Addie’s experience as a person with autism is heavily influenced by her friendships, family dynamics, and broader support systems, and although she receives a great deal of help from her loved ones, her greatest crises occur when these support systems fall short in one way or another. A prime example occurs in the novel’s beginning when her friend Jenna abandons her and condones the bullying behavior of the surly Emily. Her intensifying social difficulties are designed to reflect real-world dynamics; as children mature and their communications become more complex, the unspoken signals and undercurrents of neurotypical interactions grow more challenging for children with autism to decode. As Addie remarks in Chapter 2, “Something has changed in the last few years. It used to be easy to go up to someone in the playground and ask to play. Now people sit in tight little groups, and they like to talk instead of play. I miss the playing” (16).
Keedie, her older sister, has similar difficulties with changing dynamics that can affect friendships. She is attending university classes and has chosen to hide her autism from her peers, contradicting her own belief that her autism is something to be proud of. Faced with the additional pressures of an adult world, she worries about the relative lack of accommodations and the potential to fall afoul of ableist attitudes. Both girls find themselves feeling isolated because they lack the foundational friendships that would provide vital support for their differences.
However, Addie kindles a friendship with Audrey, who does not judge her unmasked autism behaviors and actively seeks to accommodate her needs. Audrey’s friendship and support prove invaluable when Ms. Murphy falsely frames Addie’s meltdown and attack on Emily as a one-sided and random event rather than one that was provoked by Emily’s bullying. Addie’s positive relationships and strong support system are contrasted with the story of Bonnie, Keedie’s best friend, whose isolation in a mental health facility due to her autism shows what can happen when people with autism are not properly accommodated. Because one of Bonnie’s meltdowns precipitated the decision to relegate her to a mental health facility, Keedie now fears that any poorly timed meltdown could cause her to experience the same consequences due to people’s lack of understanding. With this subplot, McNicoll very pointedly shows that Bonnie was in no way incapable of interacting with neurotypical people and participating in broader society; instead, her being in the facility is the result of having no support system amid a society that is not designed for her.
While Addie has a strong family support system, her biggest struggles come from her school’s lack of support. Early in the book, she laments that her teacher, Ms. Murphy, holds ableist prejudices and frequently subjects Addie to ridicule, openly disparaging her contributions to class. Even though Addie’s parents and Keedie take pains to ensure that she is treated fairly, they cannot protect her in every situation. In order for Addie to be fully accommodated, she must have allies who understand and assist her in every setting. A Kind of Spark shows that friends, family, and institutional support systems are invaluable resources that can help people with autism live fulfilling lives and remain free from discrimination.



Unlock every key theme and why it matters
Get in-depth breakdowns of the book’s main ideas and how they connect and evolve.