44 pages • 1-hour read
Brittany BarnettA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Beginning in the 1980s and lasting through the 1990s, the War on Drugs had devastating effects on Black communities throughout the United States. So many of these communities had poor economic conditions because of the legacy of racism. With few economic opportunities, many people got involved in the drug trade for a short time and at a low level. They were not drug suppliers, just struggling individuals trying to make ends meet.
During this time, the most popular drug in Black communities was crack cocaine, while the more expensive powder cocaine was the choice of white Americans. When laws were written to bear down on the drug trade, crack cocaine was punished much more severely, at a rate of 100:1 compared to powder, based on reasoning that was later debunked. This disparity sent Black Americans to prison for longer sentences than their white counterparts dealing an equivalent amount of powder cocaine.
The laws were intended to punish large-scale dealers who made millions of dollars off the misery and addiction of others. However, in reality, prosecutors used them to go after small-time players. When drug kingpins were caught, they snitched on others lower down the chain in exchange for lighter sentences. If they refused to give up additional names, which in many cases required them to lie, they were forced to go to trial, where the odds were stacked against them. The breadth of conspiracy laws allowed someone to be convicted on another’s testimony without any physical evidence of drugs or money. The resulting prison sentences were based on the amount of drugs traded, and that calculation was also based on testimony rather than hard evidence. These testimonies were particularly unreliable because they were provided in exchange for a lighter sentence. With harsh sentencing guidelines, the crack-powder disparity, and prosecutorial abuse, small-time players who were involved in the drug trade for a short stint were getting life sentences or decades in prison. It was a system of revenge, not justice.
Even when reforms were later passed, they were often not retroactive or inclusive enough to help most people sentenced at the height of the War on Drugs. While executive clemency allowed some people to achieve their freedom, it was a small percentage of those incarcerated who obtained that remedy. Despite Barnett’s successes on behalf of her clients, she identifies mass incarceration for drug crimes as the most pressing civil rights issue of our time, as the human cost of the War on Drugs was enormous and incredibly damaging the Black community.
While focused primarily on her work to win the freedom of those unjustly sentenced in the War on Drugs, Barnett incorporates her own autobiography into this work. As a Black female, she witnessed how the War on Drugs disproportionately and unfairly impacted her family, her friends, and her community. That connection is what provided her with such strong motivation to fight for her clients.
Growing up in rural Texas in the 1980s and 1990s, Barnett experienced the reality of segregated communities. In high school she lived in an all-Black neighborhood that was neglected by the city and much poorer than the white areas. Both of her parents spent some time in jail or prison, her father for bouncing a check, and her mother for being addicted to drugs. Would those same crimes be punished with incarceration if committed by white people? Barnett thinks not. When she visited her mother in prison for the first time, she observed a group of mostly Black women working in the fields in sweltering conditions overseen by a white guard. The scene was reminiscent of slavery. She also endured some dehumanization herself when visiting the prison, where she was often humiliated and treated with disrespect.
In law school she enrolled in a course in critical race theory that changed the course of her life. From this course, she concluded that race was a definition characteristic of US history. A long legacy of discrimination shaped the lack of economic opportunities that tempted so many Black Americans into small-time participation in the drug trade. Racial disparities in sentencing then punished these individuals harshly. Barnett herself could have been ensnared in this trap simply because she once dated a man who dealt drugs and she had knowledge of that fact.
Because Barnett was a part of the Black community and had friends impacted by the War on Drugs, she started receiving calls for legal help while still in law school. Her life’s dream had been to soar in corporate law, but upon achieving that goal, she felt compelled to work at night to secure the freedom of her incarcerated clients, who became like to family to her. Barnett related to their experiences because she herself had shared in it. Barnett repeatedly emphasizes her connection to the community because of this shared racial experience. Ultimately, her connection to the Black community caused her to shift her life’s work from corporate law to civil rights, with a focus on helping those unjustly incarcerated in the War on Drugs.
In Chapter 1, Barnett asserts, “Black love was Black wealth” (13). This theme recurs throughout the narrative, as Barnett stresses the importance of her extended family and community’s support. When she was young, for example, her grandfather and father gave counsel that she carried with her into adulthood. Her family always advised her with a deep understanding of who she was, but most importantly, they provided solace and love. Barnett’s agony during Evelyn’s imprisonment was a testament to their mother-daughter bond, but Barnett was also close to her sister Jazz and her grandparents. Even as an adult, Sunday dinners at her grandparents’ home remained a balm to her soul.
Barnett did not just receive support from her relations but also from the extended Black community. When she was in high school living in a Black neighborhood, adults often shielded her from the pain of her mother’s addiction. An older Black coworker helped keep her in the community when she was in an abusive relationship with her boyfriend. Isolation fuels abuse and traps victims, but this woman brought Barnett to her home and church, where Barnett found peace and the strength to end her abusive relationship. These and other examples, like the Black attorney who encouraged Barnett to apply to law school despite not knowing her, demonstrate how Black community members support and uplift each other.
This support continued well into Barnett’s adulthood, as she worked to win clemency for her clients backed by her community’s support. She was not working on these difficult cases alone; while she did the bulk of work on the petitions, the community gathered signatures and contacted people for letters of support. Barnett also comments on how much she benefitted from the care of her clients, who became family to her and looked out for her welfare. The bond she shared with her clients and all those in her community who suffered due to mass incarceration was so deep that she could not fully enjoy her own freedom or find peace in light of this suffering. Barnett’s story demonstrates the crucial role community and family play in the fight against mass incarceration, as sources of hope, strength, and determination to get through the darkest hours, to keep knocking and fighting for justice.



Unlock every key theme and why it matters
Get in-depth breakdowns of the book’s main ideas and how they connect and evolve.