81 pages • 2-hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Content Warning: This section of the guide features discussion of death and slavery.
In Westeros, honor is treated as another form of currency among the noble houses. While describing Brienne of Tarth, Loras Tyrell recalls Renly Baratheon’s assessment: “other knights wanted things of him, castles or honors or riches, but all that Brienne wanted was to die for him” (925). This observation illustrates the difference between people who use the trappings of honor to elevate their status and people who stake their lives on what actual honor they have.
The dynamic between Arya Stark and Sandor Clegane underscores that the novel’s world functions primarily on codes of exploitation. In this novel, Arya encounters Sandor just as he is about to be judged for his crimes. To defend himself, Sandor participates in trial by combat, an ordeal that allows him to win his innocence. This frustrates Arya: She sees little justice in the fact that his victory effectively enables him to erase his crimes from the ledger of history. In turn, Sandor kidnaps Arya for profit. He does not want to return Arya to her family because it is the right thing to do, but because doing so will earn him monetary rewards and Robb’s favor. The decision is pragmatic given that Sandor has few prospects after leaving King Joffrey’s employ, but it also means lowering himself from the status of knight to mercenary. Faced with the opportunity to end his pain, Arya decides to leaves him to suffer, having also learned that vengeance and pragmatism are stronger than ideals of valor in her world.
By contrast, Jaime Lannister’s relationship with Brienne forces him to realize the need to be honorable in a dishonorable world. Jaime identifies himself as Kingslayer, defining himself solely by the honor he lost for killing King Aerys and breaking his Kingsguard oath. When Jaime confides his backstory to Brienne in the bathhouse, he means to prove that it is impossible to serve dishonorable men and act honorably. Jaime assumes that his life is over because he acted against his vows at a crucial moment. His cynicism is exacerbated when he loses the sword hand that he believed made him a knight. Brienne, on the other hand, works to uphold her oath to Catelyn Stark, despite every attempt to challenge her and undermine her actions. Her example prompts Jaime to reconsider his jaded perspective. When he returns to King’s Landing and sees how poorly the Kingsguard treat their office, Jaime is emboldened to reform the Kingsguard as an honorable institution. The emptiness of his page in the Book of Brothers also pushes him to see that he can revise his identity as the Kingslayer. Brienne inspires Jaime to live for what honor he still has, defending her from Loras and in saving Tyrion from execution.
Martin ends the novel with ambivalence toward honor. The magic that brings Catelyn back from the dead can be interpreted symbolically. Her participation in the execution of two minor Freys is clearly a response to the idea that the Freys’ dishonor was severe enough for create an undead avenger. However, by showing Catelyn bearing witness to the execution of a pathetic man who took almost no part in the Red Wedding because “She don’t speak […] But she remembers” (1128) and can only condemn the accused to death, Martin asks whether this kind of collective punishment is really justice. More likely, indiscriminate vengeance only begins a new cycle of brutality and war that is even harder to escape—a fitting conclusion for a novel based in part on the historical events of the Hundred Years’ War in Europe in the 14th and 15th centuries.
In Martin’s world, characters are often expected to act according to their social status rather than their personal desires, or else suffer dire consequences. In a striking example, Robb Stark subverts the expectations of being king and marries Jeyne Westerling in a fit of passion, acting against the terms of his alliance with Walder Frey. In response, Frey commits a stunning act of betrayal, not only killing Robb, but upsetting the balance of power in the North and securing Lannister control of Westeros. Through this and other examples, Martin shows that acting on one’s individual wishes is a challenging, though not impossible, path in the world of the novel.
Jon Snow experiences two alternatives to the Night’s Watch life. Among the wildlings, Jon is offered freedom from the concerns that define Westeros. He has the choice to find happiness with Ygritte, the possibility to find wonder in the world that lies beyond the Wall, and the respect of leadership as a warrior among warriors. But he also sees that being a wildling means killing against his better impulses. Later, when Stannis offers to legitimize Jon as a Stark and make him Lord of Winterfell, Jon could reclaim the lordly life he was denied in childhood. However, this restoration would mean supporting Stannis’s bid for the Westerosi throne and adherence to his rigid ideas. Moreover, to live either alternative, Jon would have to desert the Night’s Watch. The decision is seemingly easy—life on the Wall is thankless, and places Jon in danger from people like Janos Slynt, however, Jon’s resolve to remain with the Night’s Watch signals his honorable commitment to a past choice. Jon has already chosen according to his personal desire; now, he would rather maintain his integrity than sell his honor for a more comfortable life that owes allegiance and fealty to values he cannot support.
Daenerys Targaryen’s character arc similarly moves in the direction of self-determination. She begins the novel acting according to the guidance of her guardians, Jorah Mormont and Barristan. When she deposes Astapor’s rulers through military might, she moves on to similarly taking over its sister cities. But when she realizes that her actions have only made her a conqueror, not a ruler—Astapor regresses to its system of enslavement as soon as her forces depart—and that her family has a history of similarly bad reigns, Daenerys reassesses her capacity for being queen: “But how can I rule seven kingdoms if I cannot rule a single city? […] My dragons need time to grow and test their wings. And I need the same” (995). At the end of the novel, Daenerys decides that she will no longer depend on the advice of the men around her. Instead, she must learn to rule herself, being cautious with her trust and working against those who seek to undermine her.
Finally, Tyrion’s arc also revolves around defying the destiny that has been chosen for him. In his outburst at the trial, he declares that he is guilty only of being a little person, which narrow Westerosi bigotry associates with deviousness and weakness. Tyrion has worked hard to prove that he is more than his stature, yet his efforts are never enough; no one believes that he is capable of being good. When Jaime admits to lying about Tyrion’s first wife on Tywin’s orders, he underscores that Tyrion is right to be angry with the world he grew up in. Tyrion must escape that world to achieve the life he wants for himself; the rest of the series explores whether he can do so.
The War of the Five Kings presents different styles of rule as the novel asks approach is best. At one point, Martin seemingly provides an answer through Sam’s perspective: “What good is a king who will not defend his realm?” (1049). However, even this ostensibly clear ideal is ambiguous. Does protecting the realm mean defending territory from those perceived to be threats? All of Martin’s kings would argue that they are doing exactly this—saving Westeros from everyone, from the clearly malevolent Others to the potentially dangerous wildlings, to rebels and upstarts like the Starks or the Baratheons. Or does defending the realm mean doing what’s best for its residents? While few of the novel’s aspiring monarchs are interested in pursuing this, several of the novel’s characters use their authority to defend those who have no power, even against the kings they serve.
Daenerys is one of the only pretenders to the Westerosi throne who wants to use her leadership to uplift those who are suffering, primarily through conquest. She is horrified by the repulsive treatment of the Unsullied and the other enslaved people she finds in Slaver’s Bay. Although she initially appears to sell Drogon to acquire the Unsullied, the act of killing Kraznys after the sale in Astapor stresses her commitment to emancipate the enslaved people for their own sake, not her own. With the seeming success of one city’s emancipation, she moves to liberate the rest of Slaver’s Bay. However, her desire to bring change is not sufficient to enact it; with little post-conquest nation-building and in the absence of any new institutions of governance, the cities she seemingly frees revert to the old system as soon as her forces leave. Realizing that ruling is not the same as conquering, she decides to refocus her efforts on reforming each city and eradicating slavery for good.
While Davos sets out to take revenge against Melisandre for her undue influence of Stannis, Davos’s purpose quickly shifts when he realizes that fighting against Stannis’s closest adviser would only undermine Stannis’s trust in him. Instead, Davos decides to work within the system of power that Stannis has established. After Stannis makes Davos his Hand, Davos uses his newfound authority to prevent Melisandre from preying on Stannis’s nephew Edric Storm, who was born out of wedlock and whose status as a hostage on Dragonstone renders him powerless. Instead of trying to kill Melisandre, Davos leads those whose oppose her to protect Edric. By embracing his position—a change of attitude he shows by learning to read—Davos is able to convince Stannis to turn his attention north and defend the Wall.
The Brotherhood Without Banners most explicitly use their collective power to defend civil communities. Although they once served Westerosi lords, they’ve reorganized their company to defend villages ravaged by the War of the Five Kings. Their trials of the powerful rely on the voices of smallfolk who are not heard in any other court. Gendry volunteers to help the Brotherhood because he believes in their principles rather than serve as an armorer for the lords of Riverrun and Winterfell. To Gendry, the Brotherhood is worth fighting for, unlike the profit and legacy of highborn houses like the Starks. However, the Brotherhood’s efforts to empower the vulnerable are also shown to be deeply flawed. Their effort to bring Sandor to justice is dependent not on his guilt, but on his prowess with the sword. Later, their condemnation of the gormless Merrett is equally heavy-handed in the opposite way. While they’ve managed to restore some power to the oppressed, they are not necessarily delivering more justice than the kings they resent.



Unlock every key theme and why it matters
Get in-depth breakdowns of the book’s main ideas and how they connect and evolve.