61 pages • 2-hour read
Ernest HemingwayA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Content Warning: This section of the guide includes discussion of death, illness, animal death, and sexual content.
In Across the River and into the Trees, Venice is more than just a setting. The atmosphere and the physical properties of the city carry significant symbolic value. Situated on a lagoon and cut off from the mainland of Italy, the city is, by its very nature, an isolated place. The colonel must disembark from his car and take a boat to his hotel; later, he must navigate the canals of the city via bridges and gondolas. In this sense, Venice is distinct from other cities. The uniqueness is significant for the colonel, over and apart from the city’s intertwinement with his personal history. Venice symbolizes a disconnect from ordinary reality. For one, the isolated, unique city represents a different conception of community on a physical and geographic level; it thus exaggerates the qualities that make European countries distinct from the United States and appealing to the colonel. The city’s separation from the mainland also evokes the colonel’s desire to escape the reality of his approaching death. In effect, Venice is a dream into which the colonel enters while Coming to Terms with Mortality and Illness.
The novel treats Venice as a symbol with meaning for characters other than the colonel. There are many more people in the city, each of them with an emotional attachment to Venice that is just as complex as his own. In this sense, Venice emerges as a symbol of trauma experienced on a social level. The employees in the hotel allude to this, mentioning the friends and family members they lost during the war. For Renata, too, the city is populated by empty spaces. Her father was killed during the war, and her family home was burned down. The fight for Venice (and for Italy more broadly) has thus affected its residents’ lives, and their continued habitation of the city is a symbolic reminder of what they have lost, particularly as many of the people responsible continue to live in Venice to this day. The colonel identifies a number of ex-fascists (or people whom he believes to be ex-fascists) who target him in the city. They bear their grudges against Allied soldiers, just as the surly boatman on the duck shoot does. The entire city has endured a great trauma, and its continued existence and operation become a symbol of the way in which this trauma is navigated and managed in the present day, developing the theme of The Impact of War on Identity.
The tensions surrounding the city find expression in the depiction of Venice’s weather. The colonel visits the city during a cold spell. The wind whips at Renata’s hair, and a deep, dank fog lies heavily across the lagoon and the surrounding waterways. There is thus a distinct hostility to the environment that mirrors the emotional reality of the colonel’s encroaching mortality, as well as the animosity directed at him by those Venetians who dislike Americans or Allied soldiers. The thick fog also mimics the density and the obfuscation of the colonel’s memories; he often deliberately skips over or withholds certain parts of his past, keeping them behind a wall of fog so as to preserve Renata’s innocence. The cold hostility of Venice and the clouded uncertainty of the weather therefore represent the complex emotions of the colonel’s final days.
The novel begins with the colonel taking part in a duck shoot—an event that resonates symbolically in various ways. The shoot itself is a wealthy person’s pursuit. Though the colonel is not particularly wealthy himself, he has been personally invited by his friend, Barone Alvarito. His involvement in the shoot establishes the social circles in which the colonel moves. He may not be born into wealth, like Renata, but he has—through his actions—endeared himself to the upper echelons of Venetian society. However, the difficult experience with the surly boatman (at least in the opening chapter) suggests the limits of both the colonel’s acceptance and his worldview. He cannot understand why the boatman seems so hostile to him; he cannot imagine why the man will not simply do his job as he is told. To be treated so warmly by the aristocrats and so coldly by the working-class men of Venice illustrates the complex cultural situation in which the colonel finds himself. He considers himself a lover of Venice, appreciating the city as though it were a second home, but there is still much about the city that confounds him. The duck shoot becomes a symbolic demonstration of this complexity.
The duck hunt is also a chance for the colonel to employ many of his old talents without the human cost of war. The organized shoot is a parody of military action. With careful tactics and planning, the lower-ranking men follow their superiors’ orders. They drive the ducks toward the men with guns, who shoot them out of the sky. These quasi-military maneuvers allow the colonel to employ much of his wartime muscle memory. He can fire his gun without needing to worry about the consequences. There is no trauma associated with the duck hunt, at least for the colonel. Unlike actual war, the duck hunt is a version of organized violence that the colonel can enjoy, allowing him to connect with a vital aspect of his identity. The duck hunt represents war by other means.
Relatedly, the duck hunt is a chance for the colonel to do something well, furthering the novel’s exploration of Masculinity and Authority Under the Pressure of Physical Decline. Throughout the novel, he takes great pride in his professionalism, his knowledge, and his decision-making. From selecting wines to shucking oysters, he prides himself on doing something and doing it well. When he shoots his gun, he takes pride in the act itself. This is why the boatsman’s unprofessional behavior is such an irritation, as it impedes the colonel’s ability to shoot well. By the end of the day, he has not shot many ducks but is pleased with the manner in which he shot. The action itself takes precedence over the consequence, though he regrets the few birds that he will be able to send to his friends in Venice. In this manner, the duck hunt itself becomes a symbolic exercise in expertise and agency, reassuring the colonel that his illness and age have not eroded these fully.
Renata gifts the colonel a portrait of herself that was painted two years before the novel takes place. At the time that the portrait was painted, Renata was just 17 years old. The colonel is well aware of her youth; he refers directly to the portrait as “jailbait,” acknowledging the illicit or dubious nature of the age gap in their relationship. On one level, the portrait therefore symbolizes the colonel’s conflicting feelings about the relationship, including guilt, remorse, and regret.
Renata has since grown into a 19-year-old woman, making the relationship somewhat more socially acceptable. However, the portrait is of a young girl, fixed in a moment in time. The subject will not grow old, which is especially captivating for a man who is confronting his own mortality. The portrait is thus a symbol of youth but also a painful reminder of aging. If the colonel acknowledges the difference that just two years make between the painted Renata and the actual Renata, then he—at roughly 50 years old—feels this contrast personally. Renata barely recognizes her younger self, while the colonel cannot help but recognize how his own younger self—in the form of traumatic war memories—intrudes on his present moment.
The portrait is not the only present that Renata tries to give to the colonel. She wants him to take her emeralds, but he repeatedly declines. He tries to explain this to Renata, but he does not cite any specific reason as to why he would accept one gift and refuse another. Instead, he presents the contrast and encourages her to come to her own understanding. The implication is that the emeralds represent raw wealth, a kind that the colonel does not feel comfortable taking from a young woman. By contrast, the portrait is a sentimental gift whose value lies in the subject matter and the recipient rather than the painting itself. He does not even want to keep the frame, preferring to keep only the portrait. Renata comes to understand the significance of this. As the scion of a wealthy family, she has a different relationship to money than the colonel, who comes from more humble origins. She accepts that the emeralds will be returned and the portrait will not; that she should accept this symbolizes the gradual way in which she is maturing as an adult, as well as her growing understanding of the man she loves.
The portrait is delivered to the Hotel Gritti and spends time in the colonel’s hotel room. There, he addresses the portrait as though it were Renata, but whereas he refers to Renata as “Daughter,” he refers to the portrait as “Portrait”. This suggests that the colonel feels that to address the painting is not to address Renata herself. This is even more evident in the subject matters that he is willing to discuss. He is frank and uninhibited when talking to the portrait, voicing thoughts and concerns that he later withholds from the actual Renata. The contrast between the conversations with the portrait and the conversations with Renata symbolizes the way in which the colonel seeks to preserve the innocence of his young lover while also trying to unburden himself—a tension that is never fully resolved.



Unlock the meaning behind every key symbol & motif
See how recurring imagery, objects, and ideas shape the narrative.