44 pages • 1-hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
hooks opens with a discussion of the women’s liberation movement and its failure to include Black women in its activism. hooks explains that Black women were mostly silent during this period: “It was the silence of the oppressed—that profound silence engendered by resignation and the acceptance of one’s lot” (1). hooks proposes that Black women were conditioned to ignore and deny their womanhood through generations of violence and discrimination, and the prejudice they experienced was about their race, independent of gender. To accept that sexism was as significant of a threat as racism meant acknowledging that Black women faced a double-edged sword of oppression.
In the 19th century, Black women joined white women in the women’s suffrage movement. Women like Anna Julia Cooper and Sojourner Truth recognized the intersecting oppressions of racism and sexism and how both marginalized Black women. However, the movement became more exclusionary when white men organized to give Black men the right to vote before opening the polls to women. hooks points to this fact—that white men were more willing to give rights to Black men than women—as evidence of how deeply ingrained sexism is in white culture. This caused the movement to splinter. White women activists pushed back against a move to allow Black men to vote, believing that it would destroy their opportunity to make progress. Likewise, Black men saw the women’s suffrage movement as a roadblock to getting their own rights. Black women were placed in a difficult position: Support the right of white women to vote, or support the rights of the Black men in their lives. However, no one dared to ask whether Black women deserved the right to vote as well.
No matter where they turned, Black women’s voices were not represented. Supporting the women’s suffrage movement meant denying their identities as Black people, but supporting the right of Black men to vote meant accepting a new type of subservience. hooks asserts that the patriarchal values of white culture were already seeping into the homes of Black families. For example, Black women were encouraged to be subservient to their husbands. Establishing the right for Black men to vote while denying the right to women meant a confirmation of white patriarchal values. In the 1950s, when Black men and women fought for civil rights, Black male leaders were given more attention and acclaim while Black women were overlooked. In both feminist and civil rights activism, Black women were expected to support the liberation of others and stay quiet about the oppression they faced in their own lives.
hooks explains that correlations can be made between these early movements and more recent women’s liberation movements. White women often romanticize the Black female experience, glossing over oppression by focusing on the strength of Black women: “[T]o be strong in the face of oppression is not the same as overcoming oppression” (6). When scholars and activists talk about Black rights, they often center their discussions on men. When they discuss women’s rights, they focus on white women. hooks argues that sexism and racism work together to oppress Black women and render them invisible. When examining discrimination and oppression, race and sex cannot be separated. Considering both is essential to understanding and analyzing the Black female experience.
Black women face sexism and racism, both of which are products of white patriarchal culture. The slave trade was initially focused on Black men, but Black women were soon viewed as valuable for their ability to produce children, who were automatically enslaved. Black men and women were treated differently on the slave ships. Because Black women were not perceived as threatening in the same way Black men were, Black women could move freely about the ships. While they were less inhibited in their movement, this placed them in greater danger, and Black women often arrived on American soil already pregnant from rape. The trauma these women experienced on the ship was part of a larger effort to indoctrinate African people into lives of subservience and oppression.
hooks explains that when examining slavery, scholars often focus on the Black male experience. Some argue that Black men were emasculated by white dominator culture and that the loss of Black masculinity negatively impacted Black family structures. hooks argues that Black men were not stripped of their masculinity; in fact, Black masculinity was a major selling point for many enslavers as masculine traits like strength and endurance are useful for manual labor. However, Black masculinity was only encouraged so long as it was valuable to white enslavers. Hooks asserts that the description of slavery as a type of emasculation for Black men is evidence of scholars’ sexist assumptions, further illustrated by the lack of academic work on the Black female experience under slavery.
One of the greatest areas of distinction is the type of work Black men and women were forced to do by their enslavers. Black men typically worked as laborers. Black women, however, worked as laborers and in the household. They were forced to breed children to increase the enslaved workforce, and they were the target of white sexual assault. hooks argues that the fact that Black women worked in fields when white women did not perform manual labor is evidence of the masculinization of Black women rather than the de-masculinization of Black men.
While people often draw distinctions between house laborers and field laborers under slavery, Black women who performed domestic tasks in the home were not better off than those who labored in the fields. Often, they were more closely observed and more vulnerable to acts of cruelty and violence by their white enslavers. Enslaved Black women knew that they were at risk of sexual assault and rape, and their passive submission was required for survival: “Any show of resistance on the part of enslaved females increased the determination of white owners eager to demonstrate their power” (26). Hooks explains that the rape of enslaved Black women was a way for white men to assert the dominance of white imperialism. Abolitionists who focused on sexual violence in slavery did so from a position of moral depravity; they exposed sexual violence to claim that white men were bringing shame on themselves and their families by having contact with Black women. There was less emphasis on the reality of rape, brutality, and violence that Black women endured.
hooks connects a patriarchal hatred of women and the experiences of enslaved Black women. Christian ideologies taught that women were sexual tempters, the cause of men’s ruin. The Salem witch trials were an example of Christian hatred of women. The 19th century saw a shift away from religious fundamentalism, and while the perception of white women changed, it simply took on new elements of the same religious patriarchy. Rather than tempters, white women were perceived as idols of purity and submission. White women were expected to rise above sexual feelings and embrace chaste domesticity. hooks explains that forcing women to deny their sexual selves is another example of male hatred of women, parading as respectful worship. These norms were strictly enforced, and white women who were perceived as deviant were punished, sometimes through sexual violence or imprisonment in asylums.
As white women were elevated as non-sexual entities, Black women were sexually exploited within the slave trade. Attacking Black women was encouraged and rampant, and Black women had no one they could turn to for protection. Within their families, Black men and women mirrored the white patriarchal structures of the dominant culture. Hooks concludes that many historical interpretations focus on the experiences of enslaved Black men and fail to acknowledge the impacts of racism and sexism on Black women.
In the Introduction, hooks locates her research between two major women’s movements: the women’s suffrage movement of the late 19th and early 20th century and the women’s liberation movement of the 1960s. Both movements are considered important eras for the feminist movement and thought, and hooks chooses these timeframes to acknowledge the achievements of these movements while critiquing their shortcomings. She argues that both movements ignored and oppressed Black women while prioritizing and elevating the status of white women. Focused on the rights of women, they projected a limited definition of womanhood as belonging exclusively to white women. hooks explains that many Black women internalized this messaging, contributing to The Devaluation of Black Womanhood:
Contemporary black women could not join together to fight for women’s rights because we did not see “womanhood” as an important aspect of our identity. Racist, sexist socialization had conditioned us to devalue our femaleness and to regard race as the only relevant label of identification. (1)
By using the plural first person in statements like these, hooks aligns herself with these Black women, even as she asserts that feminism is valuable and necessary. With this, hooks asserts that her desire for a more inclusive liberatory movement comes from a personal place, and she is working to counter both historical exclusion and her own.
Throughout American history, Black women have been forced to choose between their identities as either Black or female, and cultural movements failed to acknowledge how these two identities intertwined under the double oppression of racism and sexism. While women advocated for the right to vote, white men countered with an opportunity for Black men to vote, excluding both white and Black women. hooks cites Elizabeth Cady Stanton, a foundational figure of the women’s suffrage movement, to emphasize the way white feminists responded to these divisive tactics with racist remarks. For example, Stanton once remarked, “I protest against the enfranchisement of another man of any race or clime until the daughters of Jefferson, Hancock, and Adams are crowned with their rights” (127). White women saw the inclusion of Black men in suffrage as a threat to their cause, while Black men asserted that Black women should support their patriarchal positioning in the larger culture. Ultimately, neither position allowed Black women suffrage.
Black women experienced the same divisiveness during the civil rights movement, which ignored the voices of Black women and emphasized the voices of Black men. hooks asserts that rather than rejecting the patriarchal values of white culture, Black men viewed freedom as the ability to participate fully in those systems of power and domination. Simultaneously, white women who advocated for women’s liberation often failed to include Black women in their activism. As such, hooks threads the needle between both movements, tracing how Black men and white women pushed for their own rights and stripped Black women of their identity: “When black people are talked about the focus tends to be on black men; and when women are talked about the focus tends to be on white women” (7). The dual forces of sexism and racism placed Black women in a position of perpetual invisibility, forcing them to choose between two causes that excluded their experiences and identities.
Although hooks does not use the term “intersectionality,” which was only coined a few years later by law professor and civil rights activist Kimberlé Crenshaw, The Intersectionality of Racism and Sexism pervades her work. hooks recognizes how Black women have historically been forced to participate in the patriarchal culture first developed by white colonizers while being uniquely targeted by racism and sexism. Chapter 1 explores slavery and how it shaped the experiences of Black women. hooks reveals that The Impact of Patriarchal Culture placed Black women in a continual position of forced vulnerability. They became targets for sexual violence and brutality at the hands of white men, Black men, and white women alike. hooks also explores how racism and sexism intertwine in her examination of Black masculinity during slavery. Historical scholarship tends to focus on the assumption that slavery stripped Black men of their superior roles as men. hooks argues that scholarship centered on Black emasculation fails to recognize how masculinity and patriarchy contributed to the disparity of treatment among enslaved Black women and Black men. Many enslaved Black men refused to perform specific tasks that they deemed feminine, and many Black men played dominator roles within their homes. Furthermore, she argues against the idea that Black men’s emasculation is the central negative impact of slavery; lamenting these men’s inability to participate in patriarchal positions of power both perpetuates Black women's subjugation under white supremacist patriarchy and overlooks the particular ways Black women were exploited during slavery, such as reproductive and sexual violence. Overall, this section advocates for reevaluating common narratives about slavery, racism, and feminism with the goal of creating a new, equal foundation for future activism.



Unlock all 44 pages of this Study Guide
Get in-depth, chapter-by-chapter summaries and analysis from our literary experts.