87 pages • 2-hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Rosenthal closes the book with a theory from the book The Fate of Empires, which states that all “great societies [...] descend [into an age of decadence] before they fall for good” (328). This decadence is connected to people hoarding intense wealth and power, thus contributing to the decline of ideas of service or duty. America, being over 200 years old, is of the age where a historian might expect it to fall to this decadence.
The decline of charitable healthcare is partly to blame. Medical heroes such as Frederick Banting, the inventor of insulin treatments and Jonas Salk, who effectively halted the polio epidemic with his vaccine, famously wanted their cures to be accessible by all people. Doctors with this philosophy are partly responsible for medicine’s hallowed place within society. However, these sentiments are lost in the modern era. While it is understandable that advances in medical technology require more financial support, an insatiable market sent healthcare on a path of corruption and exploitation.
An American Sickness advocates for “a return to a system of affordable, evidence-based, patient centered care” (328). Every sector of the medical industry has contributed to the healthcare industry’s decline. Despite most healthcare professionals’ noble intentions behind entering the field, they must acknowledge the role they play in perpetuating this crisis. However, patients can also do more by trying to demand bold and thoughtful change from the healthcare industry and those who fail to regulate it. Knowledge is the best tool against medical exploitation, and Rosenthal ends the book expressing her hope that she has equipped the reader with the tools they will need to fight back.
Rosenthal recounts key events that have occurred since the publication of An American Sickness. Most notably, President Trump, who “squeaked into office with a vague pledge to ‘repeal and replace’ Obamacare with ‘something better,’” has since moved to put this plan into action with support from a Republican controlled Congress (331). However, it seems as though this is more difficult to accomplish than Trump previously imagined. Every proposal sent to the Congressional Budget Office revealed weaknesses in the plan that showed that their implementation would be disastrous for most Americans, who would be stuck with high premiums. Tens of millions more would lose their insurance completely. These weak points are ones that have also been noted and critiqued in the ACA: specifically, they do not curb the continually inflating price of insurance or rein in the business interests controlling the market.
In accordance with Republican philosophy, proposed new plans would leave insurance completely up to the “invisible hand” of the market. The GOP also hoped to speed the process for drug approval to allow more competition and allow insurers to reject people once again with pre-existing conditions. When this plan was publicized, many Americans gained a new appreciation for the ACA. While flawed, it allowed them access to health insurance and offered subsidies that would not be available otherwise. A poll conducted by the Kaiser Family Foundation in August of 2017 showed that 78% of Americans wanted Trump to “do what [he] could to make the current health law work” (333).
Rosenthal also follows up with patients she interviewed in her book. Dr. Jeffrey Kivi, from Chapter 1, experienced severe complications after switching off of Remicade. After expressing concerns that he would have to quit his teaching job and go on disability, his rheumatologist tried to restart his Remicade infusions, only for his insurer to suddenly refuse payment. Kivi believes that if he wants to use Remicade again, he “may have to hire a lawyer” (335).
Mary Chapman, from Chapter 4, has since moved to South Carolina. Balancing the notoriously high costs of living in California with those of her medical care became too much. She now flies to John Hopkins for treatment and stays in cheap hotels when she can. Wanda Wickizer, from Chapter 7, never faced the University of Virginia Medical Center in court. In the years following her neurosurgery procedure, the hospital has rejected her repeated offers to give them all the money in her retirement account (around $100,000). In response, the hospital suggested she put a lien on her house. The suit was eventually settled for an undisclosed amount. Hope Marcus, from Chapter 4, continued buying her mesalamine from India until April 2017, when her insurer no longer covered the generic pill. She now pays thousands of dollars a year for a branded pill.
Each of these patients was able to remain engaged in their healthcare decisions. This reflects a broader trend of patients becoming aware of the failures of the American healthcare industry. Voters from both political parties have been strongly opposing the attempted repeals of the ACA. This caused a reckoning amongst GOP politicians, who noticed just how unpopular their plan was. Ultimately, the promise to repeal and replace Obamacare was abandoned due to concerns over constituent reactions. While America still has a long way to come, patients are beginning to understand just what they are missing and are demanding more. Rosenthal sees this as the beginning of a “long war” to take back the healthcare system but believes this is a war that can be won.
Rosenthal begins the Epilogue with a striking theory of the decline of “great societies” coming in tandem with “an age of decadence” (328). A variety of once powerful empires, such as Greece and Rome, all met their downfall after decadence corrupted their ability to serve their people. This theory is meant to show readers what the decline of the healthcare industry signifies in the broader context of American life. It makes the issue of curing the medical world of its sicknesses all the more pressing by suggesting that further inaction could lead to the end of America as we know it.
However, Rosenthal makes it clear that this burden is not just on patients. She states that many healthcare professionals still enter the field with good intentions but are intoxicated by the idea of massive profits and personal success. Many of them “want to deliver patient-centered, evidence-based care at a reasonable price” and try their best to make this happen (329). This line is a contrast from the slightly negative portrait of some doctors painted throughout the book as intentionally exploitative. Asserting that many of them start off on the right foot encourages patients to try and work with their doctors to deliver the medical futures they both want. Conversely, it is just as important for healthcare professionals to serve as advocates for their patients, in both medical settings and the real world. Rosenthal imagines a future where solidarity between doctors and patients revives the rotting charitable roots of the healthcare industry.
Both the Epilogue and Afterword contextualize the book’s information within current events that unfolded at the time of publication. The book was published in April 2017, at which point readers would have already witnessed a presidential campaign where access to healthcare was a defining issue. During the 2016 primaries, President Trump’s colleagues espoused curbing or completely removing Obamacare, while Democratic candidate Senator Bernie Sanders ran on a platform of “Medicare for all.” If readers could not already see themselves in the patients Rosenthal interviewed, they could at the very least connect the book’s material to what they were watching unfold on their TV screens.
These segments also lend support to the idea that an informed and empowered populace can cause a massive reckoning within the health industry, which is a key theme throughout An American Sickness. She defines 2017 as a year when patients on both sides of the political aisle began demanding more out of their healthcare. Many Republican town halls were flooded with people taking responsibility for their healthcare:
Americans hurl[ing] questions at GOP senators and congresspeople about plans to remove protections for those with pre-existing conditions and to shrink the Obamacare insurance expansions, which had given health insurance for the first time to many low income Americans (337).
Republicans removing their support for President Trump’s plan to “repeal and replace” Obamacare was directly correlated to the high number of patients who began to advocate for themselves loudly and publicly. Rosenthal offers this success story as proof of her assertion that individuals can enact significant change to the healthcare industry.



Unlock all 87 pages of this Study Guide
Get in-depth, chapter-by-chapter summaries and analysis from our literary experts.