An Elderly Lady is up to No Good

Helene Tursten

52 pages 1-hour read

Helene Tursten

An Elderly Lady is up to No Good

Fiction | Short Story Collection | Adult | Published in 2013

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

Content Warning: This section of the guide includes discussion of ableism, mental illness, physical and emotional abuse, and death.

The Mistake of Stereotyping the Elderly

The collection’s stories demonstrate that stereotyping the elderly—as out of touch, emotionally fragile, and intellectually and physically diminished—is an error that can be both foolish and dangerous. Maud’s character is the main vehicle for this message, but Richard’s character, too, demonstrates the perils of underestimating older people. When most characters look at Maud, they see her age and little else. She gets away with theft, assault, and even brutal murders because people find it ridiculous to believe that a woman in her late eighties might be capable of committing such crimes.


Maud is well aware of stereotypes about the elderly—and she exploits them ruthlessly. After killing Frazzén, she orders hearing aids she does not need so that eventually, when the police come to question her, she can appear to be losing her hearing—creating an aura of vulnerability that gains her sympathy instead of suspicion. She steals a cane and a walker and uses them as props that confirm others’ beliefs about her physical weakness. She stoops, shuffles, and takes care not to be seen lifting heavy objects or moving quickly. When necessary, she affects quavering hands and voice, as if she has little remaining control of her own body. Because people are prone to believe evidence that confirms their biases, everyone accepts the idea that Maud is physically infirm—despite the fact that she travels all over the world alone, gets out into the city to shop and dine regularly, and keeps a large apartment spotless all by herself.


Similarly, her capacity to plan her elaborate trips, manage her household, and maintain her finances well enough to support a reasonably luxurious lifestyle does not alert anyone to the fact that her mind is as sharp as ever. Relying on people’s preconceived ideas about older people, Maud gets away with feigned confusion and panic after Zazza, the attorney, and the antiques dealer are found dead. She stammers and pretends to lose track of her thoughts, as if she is emotionally vulnerable and confused—leading the police to characterize her as “suffering from early stages of dementia” and dismiss her as a suspect (170).


Richard, who is very nearly Maud’s age, is one of the few people who can see past her tricks. Because he knows from his own experience that older people can continue to be quite capable and that, just like younger people, older people can be bad people, too, he is not susceptible to Maud’s manipulation. Ironically, however, Richard knows that stereotypes about the elderly also stand in his way. Richard is one of the only characters who might be able to put an end to Maud’s continuing lethal exploitation of people’s preconceptions about older people—but he knows that he will not be listened to because of his age.

The Impact of Self-Centered Thinking

Nearly all of the main characters in An Elderly Lady Is Up to No Good are entitled, selfish people who lack empathy for others. Their inability to subordinate their own wishes to the common good creates conflicts that end in horrific ways. Jasmin can only focus on her own self-indulgent art career and her desire to have more space for her creations—she has no interest in Maud’s attachment to her home or her right to live there in peace. This sets her on a collision course with Maud, whom Jasmin is too self-centered to take the time to really see. In Maud, Jasmin sees only a vulnerable target—and she dies for this mistake.


Zazza, similarly, seems not to see Gustaf as fully human and deserving of a partner who genuinely loves him. She indulges her own desire to drink and have fun with her sister, disturbing others around her and carelessly insulting Gustaf’s daughter. The attorney in Maud’s building lazily refuses to learn to regulate his emotions; he physically and emotionally abuses his wife, berating her for her failures to perfectly accommodate his every desire. Frazzén is another character whose self-centered nature makes him unable to see the danger Maud presents and who pays the ultimate price after trying to take advantage of her.


Maud, of course, is the collection’s ultimate example of self-centered thinking. She steals the cane without any concern for the patient who will need it on their way home. She assaults the grocery clerk without remorse, placing her own sense of propriety and ruffled dignity above his right to bodily autonomy and freedom from pain. She kills four people—perhaps five, if Charlotte is included in her body count—for inconveniencing or offending her in various ways.


Although Maud’s backstory provides valuable psychological context for her actions, it does not excuse them—and it provides another demonstration of how self-centered thinking negatively impacts the world. Gustaf’s selfish abandonment of Maud following the discovery that her family’s fortune was lost caused Maud great pain and blunted her trust in other people, making her very quick to suspect others of ill intent. Charlotte’s neediness and self-absorption may have been caused by an illness beyond Charlotte’s control, but this does not lessen their impact on Maud. Living for decades in bondage to her mentally ill sister’s needs taught Maud to value solitude and control above all else. In each story in the collection, Maud’s suspicious nature and her excessive need to control her environment and protect her peace has disastrous consequences for the people around her.

The Ambiguity Between Justice and Vengeance

Both Maud and her victims illustrate how morally ambiguous a person’s actions and character can be. Maud is a liar, a thief, and a killer. The least serious of these actions—her lies about whether or not she has any coffee to offer a visitor, her misrepresentation of her own frailty in order to manipulate others, the theft of the laptop, the cane, and the walker, and so on—are, ironically, also the least morally ambiguous. Maud does these things for purely selfish reasons. She easily has the resources to buy more coffee, a laptop, and other things, but she chooses not to, preferring to hoard her resources for herself whenever she can. By contrast, her murders are motivated by more pressing and understandable concerns—in her mind she is trying to preserve her home, end a neighbor’s ongoing abuse of his wife, save an old flame from an exploitative marriage, and stop someone from stealing a piece of her past.


In three of the four cases, however, the narrative creates ambiguity about whether Maud’s beliefs reflect reality. It is very clear from descriptive detail offered about the sounds coming from the upstairs apartment, from the conversations Maud overhears, and from the appearance of the attorney’s wife with a black eye that the attorney really is an abusive monster. In the other three cases—Jasmin’s, Zazza’s, Frazzén’s—the evidence is less clear. Certainly, each of Maud’s victims is portrayed as self-centered and to some degree morally objectionable. There is room for doubt, however, about whether Jasmin really is trying to steal Maud’s apartment, whether Zazza is really trying to exploit Gustaf, and whether Frazzén is really trying to steal Maud’s father’s painting.


All that is certain is that Maud feels morally justified in taking her victims’ lives. Most ordinary people, however, would still not agree that murder is the appropriate response to her victims’ perceived “crimes.” The narrative introduces yet another layer of complexity in Maud’s backstory, however, that helps to humanize and create empathy for the elderly killer. Her suspicious nature, her fierce desire to protect her apartment and its contents, and her devotion to peaceful solitude are all understandable in light of the suffering and uncertainty of her earlier years. The stories also create empathy for Maud as a social underdog by stressing how her age and gender are stigmatized. Finally, the collection’s dry, dark humor helps to establish an atmosphere in which Maud’s crimes cannot be taken with complete seriousness. The ambiguous morality of Maud’s victims, the collection’s tone, the layers of Maud’s characterization, and Maud’s perception that she has justice on her side work together to create questions about whether any of the story’s characters or events can unambiguously be called “right” or “wrong.”

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Unlock every key theme and why it matters

Get in-depth breakdowns of the book’s main ideas and how they connect and evolve.

  • Explore how themes develop throughout the text
  • Connect themes to characters, events, and symbols
  • Support essays and discussions with thematic evidence