45 pages • 1-hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
In Druckerman’s framing, parenting conventions are shaped by culture. Druckerman positions herself as unlocking the secrets of French parenting and contrasting it with American approaches, which are ineffective and even detrimental. Still, the book’s goal is not to glorify one culture over the other but rather to provide parents with an alternative methodology and some evidence supporting its efficacy.
Many of the differences Druckerman points out between France and the US are anecdotal observations with little scientific basis; instead, they stem from her attempts to assimilate into the French culture around her. After feeling embarrassed at her daughter’s behavior at a restaurant and the self-conscious feeling that only her baby is fussy, Druckerman claims that French children rarely throw tantrums, can handle being told “no,” and don’t require constant attention, while American children are needy and unable to cope with frustration. Druckerman also claims that American mothers are often totally consumed by this role and lack hobbies, social lives, or jobs. She calls this out as an especially pressing issue because she believes that women who subsume themselves in parenting cannot be happy.
Druckerman frequently makes broad generalizations about French and American parenting, which fits her assumption that parenting is an extension of the cultural zeitgeist. For example, she thinks that all French parents approach parenting babies the same way: “The French seem collectively to have achieved the miracle of getting babies and toddlers not just to wait, but to do so happily” (59). She ascribes the philosophy of French parenting to centuries-old scholars like Jean-Jacques Rousseau, whose 18th-century theories influence French parents to produce autonomous and capable children, while American parents tend to over-parent and raise children who are dependent on them (though Druckerman does not explain how this tendency has developed and what American philosophers it might be connected to). These kinds of sweeping observations mean Druckerman fails to consider how nuances or differences in socioeconomic class, education levels, background, and other situations influence parenting behavior. For instance, Druckerman does not put enough emphasis on the fact that France has many social supports in place for mothers while the US doesn’t.
Druckerman paints French parenting in such a positive light to encourage American parents to try similar methods. Her optimism that this is possible somewhat belies her contention that parenting strategies arise primarily from the surrounding culture. She points out that some aspects of the French approach have been backed up by scientific research conducted in the US. For example, French parents instill patience in their children by modeling it themselves—something child psychology experts point to as a key aspect of future success in life. Similarly, child experts affirm the French perspective of children as rational and capable people, in contrast to the American assumption that children need lots of help and support in everything they do.
Raising thriving children is the ultimate goal of all parents, but reaching this goal is different depending on how thriving is defined. In France, happiness and resilience are thought to stem from patience, calm, and self-control—qualities that parents attempt to instill in their children from birth. French parents thus assume that “autonomy is one of a child’s most basic needs” (258). They do not see a need to rush children through development or into growing up, but they do see the importance of treating children with respect, honesty, and trust. This approach prioritizes rationality as the key feature of a healthy emotional life.
Much of French parenting theory is based on the influence of 20th-century child psychologist Françoise Dolto, who believed that children are rational beings from birth and who are capable of handling limits imposed upon them, although “strictness must come with flexibility, including giving kids autonomy and choice” (234). She thought that children should be given the credit they deserve and that the best should always be expected of them. She also believed children should be given an honest and complete picture of the world and its realities, however difficult that may sometimes be. The idea is that whatever is expected of them is what they will become: If parents view their children as capable of rationality, the children are more likely to act with that rationality.
Along with viewing children as rational, French parents also view them as innately wise. They encourage their children to access their inner resources, as children are “happier when they’re sage and in command of themselves” (73-74). Belief in children’s sagacity leads to an authoritative style of parenting, which means that the parent is ultimately in charge but the child’s thoughts and feelings are still taken into consideration: After setting strict boundaries, French parents allow their children a great deal of freedom to choose, explore, and express within those boundaries. For example, French parents tend to restrict sweets to snack times and weekends, but during those times children are allowed to indulge.
The French approach also believes that healthy children rely on healthy parents and healthy families. This means that an important aspect of raising a well-adjusted child is parenting with confidence in one’s own abilities. Children can sense unease and anxiety; by “leaving a child alone, safely, to figure things out for himself” (248), parents give that child the opportunity to reach their potential.
Culture shock is central to Druckerman’s experience of new motherhood. She came to Paris to be with Simon, but remains an American at heart; she found adapting to living in France and having children in that culture challenging.
Becoming pregnant in Paris meant not having her parents as a support system nearby. Instead, Druckerman had to form a new friend group and adapt to French customs and parenting styles. Druckerman was resistant to this idea at first, but, after observing that French children around her seemed calmer and happier, Druckerman was inspired to apply French principles to her own life as a mother.
Druckerman’s personality often clashed with French expectations of expecting and new mothers. During pregnancy, she worried about everything, absorbing endless, often conflicting parenting advice from American sources. In contrast, her conversations with French parents found consistency of parenting style, which was comforting because it suggested a solid framework to be confident about. Druckerman was also advised about the importance of maintaining her feminine mystique throughout the pregnancy and childbirth because doing so would help to maintain her relationship—a French priority that American mothers often don’t feel pressure to take on.
After Bean was born, Druckerman’s journey became infinitely more complex. She discovered that she could do nothing to stop Bean from being influenced by French culture, and decided not to fight it. Instead, Druckerman adopted French principles such as serving children vegetables first and using a confident tone when enforcing rules, which produced good parenting results. Having French approaches to parenting help finally offered Druckerman a way to assimilate into her new home: “What has really connected me to France is discovering the wisdom of French parenting” (261). Though she’d felt distant and separate from the surrounding culture for a long time, becoming a mother and investigating attitudes toward parenting in France developed an appreciation for the country and its people.
Language is a fundamental building block of culture, so learning a language is a way of assimilating. When Druckerman noticed that Bean was bilingual in French and English, she realized that Bean was becoming French. Druckerman was conflicted: She wanted Bean to have a Jewish American identity but also saw the benefit of exposure to a wider variety of viewpoints and lifestyles.
In both French and American cultures, language signals belonging, respect, and inclusion. When Bean started saying “caca boudin,” it was clear that she’d absorbed French child culture where this slang is a kind of mild expletive. Using this term, which Druckerman found somewhat confusing, showed that Bean was part of her daycare community. Druckerman also saw her other children’s personalities in the way they chose to use words, like Leo’s tendency to speak in the present progressive. Social language is particularly important in France, according to Druckerman. This is especially true of saying “bonjour” and “au revoir,” which French children are expected to address to adults. This emphasis on these phrases is part of the underlying idea that French children are just smaller people and should be included in the customs of the culture.
How parents use the language of authority and the tone behind it is also key. Druckerman learned the French belief that there is no such thing as a perfect mother—an axiom French mothers repeatedly reassured her with to let her know that she was doing her best. Druckerman was also taught to use a more confident tone when reinforcing rules for her children, which Druckerman found easier to do in French than in English: “In moments of desperation I start telling my kids, in French, ‘C’est moi qui décide’ (It’s me who decides). Just uttering this sentence is strangely fortifying. My back stiffens a bit when I say it” (243).
Choice of words also matters, and this is exemplified in the French use of words like “education” instead of “discipline” for how parents enforce boundaries, and “sage” instead of “well-behaved” for describing children’s actions. The word “education” implies an ongoing process of trial and error, and learning and discovery, while “discipline” implies a harsh, reactionary response to undesired conduct. Calling a child “sage” when they are doing something right “implies a certain wisdom and capacity for self-control” (308), while telling a child to “behave well” implies that they are just following a set of rules with the innate capacity to understand why.



Unlock every key theme and why it matters
Get in-depth breakdowns of the book’s main ideas and how they connect and evolve.