47 pages 1-hour read

Chronicles: Volume One

Nonfiction | Autobiography / Memoir | Adult | Published in 2004

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

Inspiration, Imitation, and Cultural Legacy

Chronicles is largely a story of art and music as imitation and inheritance. The text charts Dylan’s multitude of early influences, from musicians like Woody Guthrie and Dave Van Ronk to visual artists like Picasso and Red Grooms. It explores how he absorbed art, music, culture, and history, learning from those around him until he was ready to channel this accumulation of knowledge and inspiration into his own work. As folk music is traditionally passed down orally, imitation is an integral part of the genre. Chronicles illustrates how Dylan expanded on that tradition, embracing a diverse array of influences to write his songs.


Dylan began his foray into folk music by learning songs from records and fellow musicians. He was “into […] the traditional stuff with a capital T” (228) and had no particular interest in writing his own songs. These early learnings, along with his apprenticeship under artists like Woody Guthrie and Dave Von Ronk, reflected the oral tradition of folk music. At the Gaslight club in Greenwich, Dylan would watch Van Ronk play, feeling as if he “was sitting at the feet of a timeworn monument” (261), absorbing all the lessons he could from the more seasoned artist. Similarly, when he first heard Woody Guthrie’s music, he felt as if Guthrie was speaking directly to him, saying he was “leaving this job in [Dylan’s] hands” and passing his music down to him (246).


Dylan’s first attempts at songwriting also mirrored folk traditions. He “changed words around and added something of [his] own here and there” to traditional songs like “Cumberland Gap” and “Shady Grove” (228). These small changes were something “others did […] all the time” (228); many folk musicians set new words to traditional melodies, shifted lyrics around, or borrowed arrangements. Woody Guthrie, for example, took “a lot of old Carter Family songs and put his own spin on them” (283). Although some saw this as “derivative,” Dylan saw nothing wrong with borrowing from other artists, and he enjoyed how “circles hook up with themselves” (288) when influences overlap and artists share their music.


As Dylan began to write more original songs, there was often the sense that he “didn’t write [a song] so much as [he] inherited it” (213). The music seemed to come from somewhere else as if Dylan “had seemingly inherited something metaphysical from a bygone era” (111). He was clearly directly influenced by folk musicians like Guthrie and Van Ronk, but more obscure experiences, like hearing “Pirate Jenny” at Theatre de Lys, also had a profound impact. Dylan musses that “it might not have dawned on [him] to write” songs like “Mr. Tambourine Man” and “Who Killed Davy Moore” without hearing “Pirate Jenny” or that he “wouldn’t’t have felt free enough or upraised enough to write” hundreds of his lines without the guidance that listening to blues musician Robert Johnson provided (287-8). All this suggests that Dylan’s music didn’t come solely from himself but from this web of inspirations and influences. Like generations of folk musicians that came before him, he took the work that was passed down to him and made it his own.

The Impact of Societal Expectations on Artists

In Chronicles, Dylan describes the pressure and expectations of both society and the music industry and how they impacted his work and personal life. After the release of his album Freewheelin’ Bob Dylan in 1963, he became an international sensation, and songs like “Blowin’ in the Wind” and “The Times They Are a-Changin’” became anthems for the burgeoning civil rights and antiwar movements. However, Dylan had no interest in public life or leading a movement, and he rejected the notion that art must be autobiographical in some way or inherently reflect the attitudes and desires of the artists.


Even early on in his career, Dylan challenged the public and industry’s expectations. As a young man, Dylan lived in the “mythical realm” of folk music. It was “all [he] needed to exist” (236) and he had little interest in “[t]he madly complicated modern world” (20). Unlike other artists on the folk scene, Dylan only cared about the music; playing “was about putting the song across” (18), not about cultivating his public persona. He “didn’t feel the need to explain anything to anybody” (8) and had no interest in changing himself or his music to make it more palatable or marketable to a public used to the “sanitized and pasteurized” music on the radio (5).


After his popularity exploded, Dylan found himself billed as “the mouthpiece, spokesman, or even conscience of a generation” (115). Based on songs like “Blowin’ in the Wind” and “The Times They Are a-Changin,’” critics and the public assumed that Dylan was a certain kind of person, a revolutionary leader concerned with social change. Dylan, however, wanted “nothing to do with representing any kind of civilization” (115). He insisted that he did nothing but “sing songs that were dead straight and expressed powerful new realities” (115); the music expressed nothing about him personally. When recording Oh Mercy with Daniel Lanois, Lanois expressed a similar desire to record “songs that defined [Dylan] as a person” (199), while Dylan argued that “what [he does] in the studio doesn’t define [him] as a person” (199). This speaks to a fundamental expectation that art be autobiographical in some respect that it reveals some previously hidden aspect of the artist to their audience.


Dylan also defied the assumption that an artist has some kind of responsibility to his audience. He insisted that he had no “duties as the conscience of a generation” (118) and refused to cave to public pressure. Instead of pursuing more fame and success, he desperately “wanted to get out of the rat race” (114) and focus on his family. He argued that “[a]rt is unimportant next to life” (121) and began actively working to dismantle his public image and alienate his fans. His celebrity and the pressure of society’s expectations caused him to lose his “hunger” for creating.

The Evolution of American Music

Chronicles tracks Bob Dylan’s life and career from growing up in Duluth, Minnesota, in the 1940s and 50s to his move to New York City in 1961 and the music he continued to make through the 1970s and 80s. His story coincides with a period of immense cultural change for the United States and the world more broadly. Dylan’s career was deeply intwined with these events and changes which affected how the public perceived him and his music.


Dylan was born in 1941, with World War II already underway, and grew up under the threat of the Cold War. It was a time when “you could feel the old world go and the new one beginning” (28); the conservative social values of the previous era were on their way out, but they had not yet been replaced by the liberation and social change of the 1960s. This was also reflected in music and art; Dylan describes the American music scene as “pretty sleepy” at the start of the 1960s when he moved to New York. The radio was “filled with empty pleasantries” as it waited for artists like “The Beatles, The Who or The Rolling Stones [to] breathe new life and excitement into it” (5-6). Folk music was virtually unknown, still “considered junky, second rate and only released on small labels” (5).


Despite the fact they hadn’t quite gripped society yet, Dylan describes the impending shifts to American art and culture as palpable in Greenwich Village in the early 60s. It was clear that “[a] lot was changing in America” (55). Television was becoming more popular, and sociologists warned that children’s “attention spans were being dragged down” (55). New forms of art like abstract painting and atonal music were “mangling recognizable reality” (90), and ideas of identity and possibility were expanding as messaging grew, encouraging people to “ignore your limitations, defy them” (90).


By 1968, “America was wrapped up in a blanket of rage” (113). The country was wracked by violent antiwar and civil rights protests and had suffered the tragedies of Martin Luther King, Jr., and John F. Kennedy’s assassinations. Dylan’s first records and his growing popularity coincided with the building chaos of the 60s. This climate of social change helped to popularize his music and created the public perception of Dylan as the “Prince of Protest” (116). However, Dylan is always vague about how much current events influenced him as an artist. He doesn’t rule out the influence of politics and current events but refuses to give them full credit for his music, either. For example, when he wrote “Political World,” it “could have been triggered by […] a heated presidential race underway” in 1988, but he doubts “that was all there was to it” (166). The tense social and political climate of the time was just one element of his inspiration.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Unlock every key theme and why it matters

Get in-depth breakdowns of the book’s main ideas and how they connect and evolve.

  • Explore how themes develop throughout the text
  • Connect themes to characters, events, and symbols
  • Support essays and discussions with thematic evidence