65 pages • 2-hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summary
Background
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Key Figures
Themes
Index of Terms
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
The term “Hundred Years War” is something of a misnomer. Rather than a continuous conflict, it was a series of wars between England and France from 1337 to 1453. The immediate reason for the war started with the death of King Charles IV of France in 1328 without a son or brother to succeed him. By then, the French laws of succession followed what was known as the “Salic Law,” which barred any woman from inheriting the crown of France no matter her relationship to the previous king. However, the question of whether a claim to the French throne could be passed down to the male descendants of a female member of the royal family was unsettled. On this basis, when Charles IV was succeeded by his cousin, who became King Philip VI, King Edward III of England claimed he was the rightful king of France because his mother Isabelle was Charles IV’s sister.
However, there were also two wider motives for the war. The first was the desire to recover lost territories in France that once belonged to the kings of England. As a result of various inheritances over the centuries, the kings of England once held the territories of Normandy in northern France and Aquitaine, Gascony, Anjou, and other lands in southern and western France, a collection of lands historians label the Angevin Empire. During the early 13th century, England lost most of the Angevin Empire to the king of France. This was a huge blow to national pride that was not at all forgotten by Edward III’s time.
A second motive involved the Netherlands. Froissart himself hints that England had economic and political interests in the region (57). Along with northern Italy, the Netherlands was home to the most profitable cloth manufacturers in Europe. The English economy depended on exporting wool across the English Channel to these manufacturers. Since France’s sphere of influence often intruded over the Netherlands, specifically the territories of Flanders and Hainault, this allowed France to pose a stark economic threat to England if they ever chose to prevent English wool from being imported. Establishing a strong presence in France, if not conquering France altogether, would eliminate that threat and secure English trade.
Although Froissart’s Chronicles concludes in 1400, when there was a long-lasting lull in the wars, the Hundred Years War resumed by 1415 under King Henry V of England. Henry V’s campaigns would end with the English occupying most of France, including Paris, and forcing King Charles VI of France to acknowledge Henry V as his heir to the French crown. Things fell apart when Henry V suddenly died from dysentery in 1422 and the new king was his infant son, Henry VI. The struggle for France finally ended with the Battle of Castillon on July 17, 1453. The aftermath saw all English territory in France reduced to just the port city of Calais in northern France. Still, the monarchs of England would continue to use the title “king/queen of France” until 1800.
The Hundred Years War saw the end of chivalry. The brutal fighting, dependence on mercenaries, and the change in tactics from knightly calvary combat and formal battles to a reliance on archery and guerilla warfare caused a shift from older, “chivalrous” ideas about war to something more resembling warfare as we think of it today. This is something Froissart himself illustrates when he describes the debate that took place between Charles V’s advisors on whether it was honorable to avoid direct combat with the English (189-190).
The Black Death is believed to have killed up to 60 percent of the population of Europe. As horrific as the devastation was, in the aftermath of the Black Death there was prosperity for the lower classes. Across Europe, entire villages had been depopulated and the noble landowners who owned much of the farming land lacked laborers for the fields or for specialized work on their estates. As a result, wages and demand for workers went up. Peasants had opportunities to migrate and find better wages and living conditions. This undermined the system of serfdom that had dominated much of medieval Europe, where peasants were expected to work land in exchange for legal and military protection. In some places, peasants were even legally bound to the land they worked.
In response to the growth in wages, many governments cracked down. They passed laws that capped wages and prevented serfs from finding new jobs, among other restrictions. The tension between the growing economic opportunities for peasants and artisans and the demands of the upper classes were a major cause, if not the cause, of peasant, artisan, and middle-class revolts in the 13th century, such as the Ciompi Revolt in the northern Italian city of Florence and the other revolts described by Froissart throughout the Chronicles, namely the peasant revolts in England, the Jacquerie in France, and Philip von Artevelde’s uprising in Flanders. Froissart even shows an awareness of the economic causes behind this unrest when he blames the revolts in England on the “abundance and prosperity in which the common people then lived” (211). Despite the harsh measures taken by some governments and the failure of these revolts, serfdom as an economic system would effectively die out in much of western and central Europe.



Unlock all 65 pages of this Study Guide
Get in-depth, chapter-by-chapter summaries and analysis from our literary experts.