Conform: A Novel

Ariel Sullivan

65 pages 2-hour read

Ariel Sullivan

Conform: A Novel

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 2025

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

Content Warning: This section of the guide includes discussion of gender discrimination, child abuse, physical abuse, and death.

Governmental Oppression of Reproductive Rights

In Ariel Sullivan’s Conform, the Illum regime grounds its authority in controlling female bodies and reproduction. The government reduces women to biological resources whose value depends on fertility and genetic compatibility. This system calculated procreation and violation of women’s reproductive rights and freedom of choice functions as the core of the state’s pursuit of genetic purity and authoritarian rule. The narrative illustrates that the government implements such oppressive reproduction policies through indoctrination at the Academy, the threat of social exile for women who fail to fulfill their reproductive “duties,”  and the brutal and forcible separation between mothers and their children.


The Academy, as the state-managed educational institution, shapes and reinforces reproductive oppression from childhood. Teachers coach young girls to view procreation as a competitive public duty rather than a personal choice. Lessons present mating as a service to society’s “Greater Good,” and instructors repeat that a girl’s purpose is to become a “compliant vessel for offspring” (8). Competition grows from this training, since every female student aims for a limited number of Procreation Agreements with Elite males. Emeline’s “Approved” label marks her as useful to the state while reinforcing her objectification and limiting her individual agency. The Starlings who prepare her for her Mate echo this message when they tell her, “You are a vessel for humanity” (24). Their language replaces her individual identity with a state-defined role that ultimately serves to preserve the established social hierarchy.


A stark system of reward and punishment sustains this structure. Women who meet their reproductive expectations enjoy brief access to Elite privileges that encourage further obedience and submission. Those who fail to conceive or bear a desirable child go to the Sanctuary, the place of mothers’ ostracization, on the outskirts of the city. After giving birth, they lose contact with their children and are “deposited among those in blue” (23), which erases their social presence. This threat makes Emeline treat her Procreation Agreement as a high‑stakes performance, since any failure means she will face social marginalization.


The regime’s claim over female lives and the policing of motherhood appear most brutally during the “Parting,” the policy where the Elite Force seizes young children from mothers at the Sanctuary. Emeline watches soldiers abduct screaming children from their mothers and knock one woman unconscious when she resists. This moment shows how the Illum places its agenda above any family connection, purposefully seeking to sever familial bonds. By breaking the tie between mother and child, the state asserts ownership over the next generation and reveals its dehumanizing methods.

The Erasure of History as a Form of Totalitarianism

Emeline’s work in the Archives, where she deletes holographic remnants of ancient art, becomes the clearest image of the Illum regime’s effort to erase the historical past and forge its own narrative. The novel shows how an authoritarian state secures control over the present and future through archival destruction and the elimination of critical enquiry. When Emeline destroys pieces that depict emotion, individuality, or conflict, the Illum narrows the cultural memory of its citizens and strips away the language that might encourage dissent. The government does more than censor; it shapes a population that cannot picture a world beyond its frame.


This strategy appears in the selective pattern of destruction. Emeline notices that landscapes and other impersonal scenes are often preserved, while works portraying people and strong emotion are labeled for deletion. She concludes that the Illum wants “to erase what life was like before the war” and “anything that makes the viewer feel is—is a threat” (59). Her reflections align with the pieces she eliminates, including, for instance, At Eternity’s Gate, which portrays a man consumed by grief, and A Huguenot, which captures a desperate embrace. By removing records of love, sorrow, and turmoil, the regime tries to cleanse emotions that can inspire a revolutionary reaction among its people and ensure that collective memory remains subdued in a world shaped by obedience.


Despite the Illum’s efforts to suppress dissent, the contact with forbidden history sparks emotional connection and rebellion. Emeline’s hidden conversations with Hal grow from their shared interest in the art that the regime destroys. Their relationship develops through their curiosity and critical interpretation of the emotional depth of the old world, which stands against the state’s push toward indifference and ignorance. Their growing bond demonstrates that curiosity persists even when governments restrict knowledge, and the desire to understand the past becomes a small form of resistance.


Counter to the state's systemic erasure of art, the rebels’ sanctuary in the Underworld strengthens the tie between cultural memory and revolt. In a vast room, Emeline finds, the Major Defects engage in art preservation, accumulating the “countless canvases, many of which [she] recognized as having been assigned for destruction” (241). These rescued works become proof of an earlier, more complex existence that represents a freer and more democratic society. By saving them, the rebels reclaim their sense of humanity and fight for the emotional and historical texture that the Illum tries to erase. Ultimately, this suggests that despite political machinations against critical thinking, the human imagination resists containment.

The Policing of Identity Within a Rigid Caste System

Ariel Sullivan’s Conform examines how the Illum’s stratified caste system regulates identity by assigning each person a fixed social role. The government divides the population into Elites, Minors, and Majors through arbitrary genetic markers, which allows it to replace personal identity with a state‑given status. This hierarchy draws strength from visible markers like a dress code, strict segregation, and prohibition of cross-class relationships, as well as the threat of being “downgraded” to a lower social caste. Such enforced social norms reveal the state’s schemes against freedom of expression, with identity policing operating as a tool to legitimize its power structures.


A key element in the Illum’s politics is the strict color‑coded clothing, which becomes an identity signifier that reinforces this rigid hierarchy in daily life. Minors like Emeline wear gray, and Majors like Hal wear blue. These visible markers discourage interaction across caste lines and strengthen a sense of separation, becoming a systemic means of stigmatization and dehumanization. For instance, when Emeline meets Hal and notices his blue clothing, her training makes her initially resist contact, which exposes how well this visual code shapes social relations. The colors do more than identify caste; they plant fear and prejudice that citizens carry into every encounter, thus reinforcing a discriminatory system.


The systemic oppression of the self is vividly represented in Emeline’s heterochromia, which contributes to her social marginalization. The Illum labels this small difference a “visual defect,” and the trait becomes the central reason for her family’s rejection and her status as a Minor. Her birth father calls her a “disgrace to our genes” (18), which shows how society’s fixation on perfection dismantles interpersonal relationships. Although her mismatched eyes unsettle those around her, Hal responds differently, recognizing her difference as a sign of unique beauty. This reaction hints at an identity beyond state labels, indicating the potential for social change.


The narrative eventually emphasizes the social construction of rigid castes, as class division stems from politics rather than biological traits. The Starlings mention that the Illum can “downgrade” offspring at will, and transform them from Elite or Minor status to a lower category or even eliminate them.  This context exposes how the Illum manipulates social rank to punish citizens or strengthen authority. With the threat of downward mobility always present, each caste becomes a method of control. The government can revoke identity and worth whenever it chooses, which turns social classification into a tool for obedience and submission to the established social order.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Unlock every key theme and why it matters

Get in-depth breakdowns of the book’s main ideas and how they connect and evolve.

  • Explore how themes develop throughout the text
  • Connect themes to characters, events, and symbols
  • Support essays and discussions with thematic evidence