45 pages • 1-hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summaries & Analyses
Plot Summary
Background
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Key Figures
Themes
Index of Terms
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Reading Tools
Fearing that republicanism could engender tyranny, the Framers created a mixed government with a system of checks and balances so that one organ of government would not dominate the Union and no single political faction could control the government. The Constitution outlines how these checks and balances function by creating three branches of the federal government and regulating the relationship between the federal government, the states, and the people.
The Constitution creates three branches of government: the executive, legislative, and judicial. This division is also called the “separation of powers.” This separation and the checks and balances placed on each, as designated in the Constitution, means that no branch can act with absolute power. Absolute power is power unbound by law, something the Framers wholeheartedly rejected. A good example of the Constitution’s system of checks and balances is how the president and Congress share war powers. The Constitution gives Congress the ability to establish and maintain an army and navy, and Congress can declare war, while the president directs military operations as the designated commander in chief.
The creation of a bicameral legislature was another method of employing checks and balances. However, the Framers did not anticipate the rise of political parties, and today’s two-party system in the United States has changed the way checks and balances within the federal legislature operate. If one party dominates the Senate and another the House of Representatives, this division may lead to congressional deadlock and limit the number of bills that are passed, since they must be passed by both houses before the president signs or vetoes them. Moreover, if the same party controls both houses of Congress and the presidency, that party’s interests will be favored. Furthermore, since the Constitution gives the president authority to appoint judicial officials, and Congress the right to approve or reject them, if a single party controls both the legislative and executive branches, their interests will likewise be favored in judicial appointments that last for years.
The Constitution also sought to balance power between the federal government and the states that comprise the Union. States cannot operate independently of the federal government, for example, by making treaties or alliances with foreign nations. They cannot act like independent nations by minting their own money or granting titles of nobility nor can they declare war without the consent of Congress. Thus, when southern states rebelled against the Union during the American Civil War (1861-1865), the Union viewed their actions as unconstitutional.
A constitutional democracy refers to a government founded by the instrument of a written constitution. In the American constitutional tradition, the document expresses the will of the people (the US Constitution’s “we the people”), and it describes the form that the government will take. The document is considered the “supreme law of the land,” and it both empowers and delimits the organs of government.
A constitutional democracy means that the government founded by the constitution is characterized by popular sovereignty and majority rule. The US Constitution was written by a special convention of delegates representing the will of the people and then ratified by the people, a process which relies on both concepts—popular sovereignty and majority rule—to produce and ratify the Constitution and so establish the government.
The Constitution establishes the United States as a democratic republic comprised of multiple states. The term “democracy” is not in the Constitution, although broadly democratic values are implied throughout. The text does describe the United States as a republic: “The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government […].” The phrase refers to a state in which power, derived from the sovereignty of the people, is vested in elected officials who represent the people; power doesn’t inhere in a monarch. The term “republican” is derived from the Latin phrase res publica, meaning “public matter” or “thing of the people.”
The United States, then, functions as a representative (rather than a direct) democracy. In the Federalist Papers, founding father James Madison wrote, “In a democracy, the people meet and exercise the government in person; in a republic, they assemble and administer it by their representatives and agents.” Madison, like most of the Framers, understood “pure democracy” or direct democracy, of the kind mentioned in the quote, to be problematic for the reasons Plato and others in the classical tradition describe: its propensity to produce demagogues and a mob mentality.
The Preamble to the US Constitution states the purpose of the Constitution and the purpose of the government founded therein: to “form a more perfect Union;” establish justice, peace, and security; and promote well-being and individual liberty. The formation of a “more perfect Union” is sometimes seen as an ongoing historical endeavor, and the constitutional tradition includes the idea that the document is a “living” one—meaning it is capable of evolution through the process of amendment, responding to the needs of history.
Senators, for example, were originally chosen by the legislatures of states. Today, citizens directly elect both their representatives and their senators. This change was brought about because of concerns that the original process wasn’t democratic enough, and the 17th Amendment’s ratification in 1913 permitted voters to elect senators directly.
More momentously, the US Constitution did not originally guarantee universal suffrage. Article 1 states that those eligible to vote for members of the House of Representatives were the same who elected state legislators. These voters were typically white tax-payers and/or property owners who were men. Enslaved people, women, and propertyless citizens were excluded from voting. The 15, ratified in 1869 after the conclusion of the Civil War, gave Black men the right to vote. The 19th Amendment’s ratification in 1920 guaranteed the right to vote for US-born women. Jim Crow laws and white supremacist violence frequently prevented Black people from exercising their constitutional right to suffrage. The Voting Rights Act of 1965 served to ensure the 15th Amendment’s enforcement. The 24th Amendment (1965) prevented the collection of poll taxes from those casting ballots in presidential and Congressional elections, while the 26th Amendment (1971) lowered the age to vote from 21 to 18.
The struggle to expand and preserve constitutional democracy in the United States has a long history. The process will continue so long as the republic survives and the words of the Preamble are taken seriously.
The Constitution’s Preamble reads:
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
From the outset, the Framers intended to secure civil liberties, or freedoms for “the People,” while creating a strong federal government that is bounded, or constrained, by constitutional law.
The Constitution replaced the Articles of Confederation that were drafted when the United States was formed. The Articles emphasized the states’ liberty and democracy, but some of the Framers, like James Madison and Alexander Hamilton, known as the Federalists, wanted a stronger federal government. They held that the Articles empowered the people too much, contributing to fears about tyranny from below, mob rule, and demagoguery. A stronger national government was widely desired for other reasons, too. Supporters of a strong federal government thought that it was necessary to lead the nation and coordinate the states. Anti-Federalist opponents of a strong centralized government typically came from farming states with smaller, more rural populations. Federalist proponents, by contrast, typically came from mercantile states with larger, more urban populations.
The Framers thus sought to strike a balance between the states’ freedom and government constraint. Finding such a balance, however, proved no easy feat and generated much debate during the Constitutional Convention in the summer of 1787. For instance, Madison proposed his “Virginia Plan,” which would create a bicameral legislature with the number of legislators in each house determined by states’ populations. Delegates from small states worried that such a system would silence their voices since they would have fewer members of Congress. The “New Jersey Plan,” alternatively advocated for a unicameral Congress. States would each have a single vote. These competing plans resulted in the “Connecticut Compromise” that appears in the Constitution. This compromise created two houses of Congress: a Senate, comprised of two delegates from each state and chosen by state legislatures, and a House of Representatives, voted for directly. The Framers also viewed the bicameral legislature as a way of balancing power between the commoners (represented in the House) and elites (represented by the Senate). The Framers’ intent was to balance power, protect individual liberties, and judiciously constrain the federal government.
Another example of this intent to protect individual liberty, constrain government, and secure states’ rights appears in Article 3 outlining the powers and limitations of the judiciary. The Constitution guarantees criminal trial by jury (except for impeachment) and ensures the accused is prosecuted in the state where the crime occurred. The Constitution thus enshrines the authority of the states to prosecute and the right of the accused to be tried in a democratic fashion.
Despite the Framers’ efforts, many anti-Federalists critics still worried that the Constitution did not adequately protect individual rights. This tension between Federalists and anti-Federalists led Madison to agree to draft the Bill of Rights, the first 10 amendments added to the Constitution in 1789. The Bill of Rights guarantees civil liberties like freedom of the press, the right to due process, freedom of religion, and protection from “cruel and unusual punishment.”
The Framers’ definition of “the people” is vague and ultimately limited. Enslaved people and Indigenous Americans are clearly excluded from population counts in the census clause, for example. Enslaved Americans are dehumanized by their counting as “three-fifths” of a full person. Moreover, the Constitution dictates that enslaved people who flee their enslavers by crossing state lines are property to be returned to an owner. They have no voice in the republic, according to the Constitution. Furthermore, the Constitution consistently uses the pronoun “he,” thus excluding women from public political life. Black men could not legally vote until the passage of the 15th Amendment in 1865, the same year that slavery became illegal, and women’s suffrage was established under the 19th Amendment in 1920.
These exclusions have had a lasting effect on American political life. Jeannette Rankin became the first woman elected to Congress in 1917, 130 years after the Constitution’s ratification. The first Indigenous American, Charles Curtis, won election to Congress in 1907, and the first Black American to serve in Congress, Hiram Rhodes, was elected in 1870. Article 1 also gives state legislatures the ability to establish who votes in Congressional elections so that when the Constitution became law, states primarily restricted voting to white, tax-paying or property-owning men. Constitutional law has therefore historically limited the “liberty” secured for “the people” to specific groups.



Unlock every key theme and why it matters
Get in-depth breakdowns of the book’s main ideas and how they connect and evolve.