52 pages 1-hour read

Curse of the Starving Class

Fiction | Play | Adult | Published in 1976

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Character Analysis

Content Warning: This section of the guide contains references to substance use, mental illness, domestic violence, emotional abuse, and sexual harassment.

Weston Tate

The patriarch of the dysfunctional Tate family and the play’s prime mover, Weston, is an almost comic embodiment of failure as a husband, father, farmer, and businessman. Weston lives with his wife and two children on a failing avocado farm in an agriculturally depressed Western state (presumably California) and doesn’t receive much respect from his family: His daughter regards him as “disgusting,” and his wife calls him a “pathetic” man who “couldn’t sell a shoestring” (173). A slovenly spendthrift, he’s a mostly absentee parent and has an alcohol addiction. Weston has largely ignored his family’s emotional needs, instead terrorizing them during his drunken rages and plunging them into debt through foolhardy purchases, sometimes funded by thuggish loan sharks. A “very big,” middle-aged man who dresses shabbily in baggy pants, tennis shoes, and a baseball cap, Weston functions mostly as a grotesquely comic character, though his behavior has a distinctly tragic undertow. For a large part of the play, Weston is asleep onstage, which hints at his casual neglect of his family and his general lack of emotional presence; before the play even begins, he shows his irresponsibility by demolishing the door of the family house. Later, he reveals that he was secretly plotting to sell the house to outsiders for his own financial gain.


Shepard’s use of character is largely absurdist and parodic; the play grossly exaggerates Weston’s actions and character arc (and those of other characters), partly to satirize aspects and archetypes of American life and culture. For instance, Weston’s emotional stinginess and financial corruption lampoon “cowboy” traditions of “going it alone” and myths of the West’s endless bounty. The “West” in his name emphasizes the mockery. He “plays ball” by going deep into debt to buy materialistic baggage (land, refrigerators, cars, houses, artichokes, etc.), which he considers necessary as a father and an American consumer. All the while, he wrongly believes that the magical aura of Western myths and all-American capitalism will somehow protect him. However, as his son Wesley explains, the bankers and other money men “have got it worked out” (193) so that he can’t win.


Past the midpoint of the play, Weston—after years of drunkenness, violence, financial irresponsibility, and neglect of his family—experiences a seeming epiphany and resolves to mend his ways. Discarding his tattered, vomit-stained clothes for “a fresh clean shirt, new pants, [and] shined shoes” (182), Weston at last identifies his vague, ever-elusive dreams with his long-suffering family rather than with something “out there.” However, his revelation, or midlife crisis, arrives too late, for now the loan sharks are circling, and he finds his family hopelessly fractured, demoralized, and divided against itself.


Believing that his “rebirth” has voided all the debts and failings of his former life, Weston briefly clings childishly to hope; making breakfast for his family, he boasts of his fatherly largess. However, his fading epiphany, though briefly euphoric, teaches him nothing of how the world works. Hearing that his daughter, Emma, was arrested for shooting up a nightclub, his first reaction is pride rather than shock or concern: “What’s shameful about it? Takes courage to get charged with all that stuff” (188). Moreover, his new optimism seems driven by selective memory: Excitedly describing a supposedly life-affirming event involving an eagle, he leaves out the grim aftermath, in which the once-triumphant eagle died violently. His own “rebirth” follows a similar trajectory: By the play’s end, Weston is forced to flee the family house that he belatedly learned to cherish. Desperate to escape the murderous loan sharks who are after him, he flees to Mexico and an unknown fate.

Ella Tate

Weston’s erratic, burned-out wife, Ella, embodies the play’s second emblem of failed parenthood. Unfaithful to her husband and shrilly contemptuous of her children, Ella’s haphazard attempts to manage the Tate household generally do more harm than good. Like Weston, she sleeps through part of the play, missing out on several momentous events for her family, and seems incapable of dealing with her children’s daily realities and well-being. When her daughter, Emma, menstruates for the first time, Ella feeds her a steady stream of misinformation, e.g., that swimming during her period can kill her by “drawing” out her life’s blood. Ella’s ludicrous advice also reveals her squeamishness, almost a phobia, of germs, which she tells Emma can jump from dirty quarters onto the sanitary napkins in vending machines. In addition, she argues, with prim revulsion, that she could smell Weston’s “skin” right through the door after his late-night return from a bar. Ironically, she hasn’t conducted own life with much caution or fastidiousness, either: It soon emerges that she’s having an affair with Taylor, the shady “lawyer” who swindled her husband on a land deal and with whom she’s plotting to commit fraud by selling the family home.


Ella’s deception extends to small, everyday matters as well as large ones. Slippery and cagey, she repeatedly tries to wriggle out of blame, as when she claims that she called the police on Weston only because she didn’t know who he was (though Wesley heard them arguing through the door) and tries to justify eating her daughter’s chicken because it didn’t have her “name on it” (141). Her grasp of economics is fuzzy, as when she deludes herself that selling the family farm, in collusion with a known swindler, will make her rich enough to retire to Europe. As Wesley tries to remind her, however, the house is full of termites, is still under mortgage, and has already been borrowed against.


Like her terror of germs, Ella harbors a fatalistic dread of a nameless, invisible “curse” that “goes back and back to tiny little cells and genes” and is “bigger than government” (174). This curse, which “repeats itself” through generations, may explain her desire to flee as far as possible from the family home—to Europe, whose castles and “fancy food,” she thinks, may protect her from the spreading rot. Ella’s fear of squalor and a cursed heredity made her susceptible to her “lawyer friend’s” half-baked promises of escape, but by the play’s end she remains trapped at the family farm, her future as uncertain as her husband’s.


Though largely oblivious to her own situation, Ella at least sees through the sad self-delusion of Weston’s epiphany and supposed “rebirth.” Correcting his anecdote about the magnificent, soaring eagle, Ella describes to Wesley the true ending and moral of the story: the abject, plunging death of the hungry bird, whose chest was torn open in midflight by the equally doomed cat. This cat—hungry, greedy, lashing out in a final, desperate frenzy—could well be a symbol for Ella herself.

Wesley Tate

The son of Weston and Ella Tate, Wesley lives with them on the family avocado farm and seems to be in his late teens or early twenties. The play’s most thoughtful character, Wesley nevertheless shows signs of following in his father’s volatile footsteps, as when he opens his fly in the family kitchen and urinates all over his sister’s 4-H chart. His mother and sister chalk up his temper to an “explosive” gene (“nitroglycerin”) that has passed down, father to son, through the Tate bloodline—though at first, Wesley seems to have inherited less of it than Weston. Wesley’s clothes (blue jeans and cowboy boots) suggest a vigorous work ethic, and for the first two acts of the play, he’s the only family member who does meaningful work, even if this mostly consists of cleaning up fragments of the door his father destroyed. He also tries to talk sense to both his parents, arguing to Ella that she can’t realistically sell the family house, much less get “rich” from it, and struggles to talk his father down from his midlife epiphany of having been “reborn” as a devoted family man—which has only left him vulnerable to vengeful loan sharks.


In addition to being the least criminal member of his family, Wesley is the only one who seems free of delusions and rationalizations. He thus functions in the play primarily as a spectator and truth-teller rather than as an actor; as he tells his sister late in the play, “I didn’t do a thing. […] I just grew up here” (196). As a relatively passive observer of his family’s dysfunction, Wesley seems a stand-in for the audience, or even the playwright himself. Indeed, the rough outlines of Sam Shepard’s own upbringing resemble those of Wesley Tate.


Unfortunately, Wesley, too, seems stymied by the family’s hereditary “curse,” i.e., the self-destructive rage, aloofness, and naivete that has already doomed his father. Trying haplessly to replicate his father’s “rebirth” in himself, Wesley goes through the same motions—taking hot and cold baths, then walking around naked, and finally putting on his father’s old clothes—which does bring an epiphany, but the wrong kind. As he puts on Weston’s filthy clothes, he experiences a repugnant “change of the guards”: “And every time I put one thing on it seemed like a part of him was growing on me. I could feel him taking over me” (196). The “curse” of the father has twisted the biblical parable of the prodigal son inside out: Instead, Weston is the prodigal father who returns to his son and, rather than finding redemption, drags his son down with him.


Eventually, Weston runs off again, leaving Wesley marooned, perhaps forever, on the ruined family farm with his mother, possibly sliding into the same dysfunctional union with her that his father had. The previous hints of incest between the two make this fatalistic swapping of roles disturbingly credible. All the same, Wesley’s character arc remains ambiguous, for he shows signs of having absorbed some lessons from the failures of his father, sister, and mother. The play ends with Wesley staring steadily “out,” with his back to his mother, even as she talks to him; suggesting that he might yet escape his family “curse,” as did (presumably) Shepard himself.

Emma Tate

Weston and Ella’s barely pubescent daughter, Emma, experiences the most dramatic and destructive changes of all the play’s main characters. Little more than a child at the play’s start—crayoning a 4-H poster and gushing about a neighbor’s pool—she quickly devolves into a surly teen and then to a trigger-happy desperado, all within a couple of days. Finally, ravenous for a life of “crime” far from home, she makes the deadly mistake of stealing her parents’ car, which her father’s creditors rigged to explode upon starting. Shepard presents her sudden death, as random and melodramatic as her short life, as absurdist slapstick; her assassins literally giggle at the “wallop” of the blast.


By far the most cartoonlike of the Tate family members, Emma’s character arc offers no attempt at psychological realism: Her accelerated fall from innocence, which packs years of disillusionment and corruption into a few short hours, is farcical. Underneath, of course, runs a deep vein of seriousness, even tragedy. At the start of the play, Emma’s first period coincides with her father’s destroying the kitchen door, signifying how the changes of puberty increase vulnerability to outside threats, especially in a chaotic household that offers little stability or guidance.


When her mother steals her chicken and her brother urinates on her 4-H poster, Emma vows to run away from home and pursue a succession of unlikely jobs: deep sea fisher, auto mechanic, short-order cook, novelist. These grandiose dreams fizzle when she faces her first hurdle, a wild horse that throws her in the mud. After this setback, she morphs into a foul-mouthed adolescent who asks visitors (e.g., Taylor) strange, impertinent questions, such as whether her mother “bleeds.” Soon, learning that Taylor and her mother are plotting to sell the house out from under her, she daydreams of swindling the two of them while disguised as a Spanish-speaking auto mechanic. Finally, her fantasy life explodes into pulp-novel violence when she shoots up a club owned by the gangster Ellis, who was trying to defraud her family.


Weaseling out of jail by making “sexual overtures” to a police sergeant, Emma completes her unsentimental education—from earnest 4-H farmgirl to hard-boiled femme fatale—via a spectacular demise by car bomb. Her fall from grace echoes her father’s abject tailspin, but her self-destruction is much faster—tellingly, she dies in his stead—signifying the ever-accelerating pace of modern culture, a frenetic “curse” all its own. Weston, who likewise falls prey to pop tropes, absorbed his Western myths at an earlier time and at a much slower pace, whereas Emma, a symbol of modern, feckless youth, embodies the live-fast-die-young ethos of violent TV, pulp fiction, and pop songs, in all their lurid disposability. Emma, yearning to “disappear into the heart of Mexico” like “that guy who wrote Treasure of Sierra Madre” (149), gets the pop reference wrong but disappears nonetheless.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Unlock analysis of every major character

Get a detailed breakdown of each character’s role, motivations, and development.

  • Explore in-depth profiles for every important character
  • Trace character arcs, turning points, and relationships
  • Connect characters to key themes and plot points