59 pages • 1-hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
As the subtitle of her work suggests, in Dinners with Ruth, Totenberg develops a theme about The Importance of Friendship. While Totenberg describes how her friends helped her cope with personal hardships, she especially highlights how friendships transformed her experience of work and helped her to build a productive and enjoyable career. She recalls, “The other crucial aspect of friendships in that period […] is that they were different. For women of my generation, it was not natural to find an immediate group of friends at work […]. It was lonely at work. That’s the only way to describe it” (58). She contrasts these feelings of isolation at her early jobs, where she did not have female colleagues, to the close “sisterhood” of friendships she formed at the National Public Radio (88). Totenberg credits these close friendships with not only increasing her enjoyment of her job, but also providing her with the mentorship she craved and needed to develop her skills. Totenberg considers how the sexist discrimination that was so prevalent at the time made her and her colleagues “natural allies” for each other (59). The author credits her closest NPR friends, Cokie and Linda, with teaching her how to be a generous role model and pass on mentorship to other women, too. The author demonstrates the intensity—and necessity—of these female friendships by revealing that some of their male colleagues “resented the fact that we were a pack” and called their hangout area “the fallopian jungle” (60). Totenberg points out that the “pack” mentality was hardly accidental, since she and her colleagues felt that “There was safety—and power—in numbers,” neither of which she could have attained alone (60).
Totenberg shares that Ginsburg also coped with feeling like an outsider at work, something the two bonded over. The author remembers, “We were both outsiders to the world in which we operated. We both had our noses pressed up against the windowpane, looking inside, and saying, ‘Hey, men in there, let me in!’” (40). Ever an outsider in the legal profession, Ginsburg had to wait until she joined the Supreme Court at the age of 60 to experience the comfort of female friendships in the workplace. Totenberg writes, “For the first time in her life as a judge, Ruth was also part of a genuine sisterhood” (130). Ginsburg called Justice Sandra Day O’Connor “the most helpful big sister anyone could have,” and was grateful for the advice and encouragement O’Connor gave her as she began her new position (131). Totenberg suggests that having two women on the Court helped to normalize women’s presences in that workplace, and their mutual support helped both of them succeed. For instance, according to Totenberg, when Ginsburg joined the Court, the institution finally provided a women’s washroom. The author also argues that Ginsburg was not as easily dismissed by her male colleagues at the Court, which she was in previous positions, because of O’Connor’s supportive presence. Totenberg concludes, “They really were a team” (132).
Another recurrent theme in Dinners with Ruth is the sexist discrimination that affected both Totenberg and Ginsburg throughout their careers. These incidents provided yet another opportunity for bonding between the friends, as they could relate to each other’s experiences of trying to break the “glass ceiling” that prevented women from enjoying equal status with male colleagues. The author details the many ways in which both women experienced such discrimination or mistreatment and also reflects on how they tried to confront or overcome these experiences. For example, both Totenberg and Ginsburg were passed over for job interviews and promotions. Totenberg explains that women were rarely promoted to important positions in the press in the 1960s and 1970s, instead working in less-visible and lower-paid positions. Meanwhile, Ginsburg found it nearly impossible to find a job as a lawyer, even after graduating first in her class from law school. Both women were also paid less than their male colleagues, even when they had more experience than them. Indeed, unequal pay for women was so common that their bosses did not even try to hide this fact. Despite being hired by a university in the same year that the Equal Pay Act was passed, Ginsburg was told that she would be paid less than her male colleagues because she was not a man or the breadwinner in her family. Both Totenberg and Ginsburg questioned this treatment, and Totenberg tried to persuade her bosses to increase her pay, which they eventually did. The author also details the myriad ways in which she was sexually harassed at work by bosses, acquaintances, and colleagues, behavior Totenberg usually chose to ignore.
Their spouses, Marty Ginsburg and Floyd Haskell, encouraged Ginsburg and Totenberg as they advanced in their careers and continued to act as pioneers in professional workplaces. For instance, Marty Ginsburg encouraged his wife in her studies as a law student, boasting to his friends, “My wife will be on the law review” (10). He later informally campaigned for his wife’s nomination to the Supreme Court. Meanwhile, Totenberg’s husband Floyd accepted that she would not change her last name when she married him. She recalls their conversation:
‘Well, I worked very hard to have a profession and a recognizable name, and I don’t want to change that.’ I paused and added, ‘How would you feel if somebody said to you that when you married me, you would have to become Floyd Totenberg?’ He looked over and said two words, ‘Got it’ (66).
Totenberg’s theme on sexism helps the reader understand the discriminatory environment in which she and Ginsburg had to forge their careers. By including a variety of anecdotes about the mistreatment she and Ginsburg faced, Totenberg educates the reader about the changing professional landscape for women in the US while also making them feel more invested in her and Ginsburg’s life stories.
Another recurring theme that Totenberg explores is how experiencing loss and hardship can reveal the depths of a friendship’s loyalty and commitment. For instance, when the author experienced a detached retina and was hospitalized after her eye operation, she was buoyed by her friends’ generosity. She remembers, “I was also taken aback by other people’s kindness; it was one of my first lessons in the pure giving of friendship in a time of need” (77). Totenberg later recalls her distress when her first husband, Floyd, was gravely ill and in the hospital. While this experience was a personal low for Totenberg, who tried to juggle working with caring for her husband, she shares that she felt loved and supported by her friends, writing, “I look back and I don’t know how I would have survived had it not been for my friends and family” (82). She recalls how Ginsburg took the time to visit her and encouraged her to avoid exhausting herself through full-time caregiving, telling Totenberg in her “gentle, blunt way,” “You know, Nina, you can’t be there all the time. It’s not good for you and it’s not good for him” (81). Totenberg calls Ginsburg’s support “[…] exactly the right advice, the best advice” for her at the time (81). Totenberg was touched by Ginsburg’s continued loyalty, calling their regular phone calls a “personal lifeline” for her at the time (83).
Later in life, Totenberg was able to return the favor when she provided emotional support to Ginsburg and her husband as they endured several bouts with cancer and other serious health issues. While it was upsetting to see her friends in pain, Totenberg feels that the situation had a silver lining. She explains that Marty Ginsburg’s loss of health highlighted the depth of her friendship with Ginsburg and helped her to realize that she depended on Totenberg, too. She writes, “It had taken me years to appreciate the type of friendship we could have; it took until Marty’s illness for me to fully appreciate that she might need me, really need me, as a friend” (258). As the COVID-19 pandemic began, Totenberg felt fortunate to host Ginsburg in her home for weekly dinners, and was honored to be among the few people Ginsburg socialized with, which she attributed to their “different bond” (259). She believes that the stress of the pandemic emphasized the strength of their friendship, writing, “And it took a pandemic for me to truly understand what that friendship meant, to both of us” (258).



Unlock every key theme and why it matters
Get in-depth breakdowns of the book’s main ideas and how they connect and evolve.