62 pages 2-hour read

Everything Is Tuberculosis: The History and Persistence of Our Deadliest Infection

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 2025

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

Bias as an Illness of the Spirit

Content Warning: This section of the guide includes discussion of illness, death, ableism, antigay bias, gender discrimination, and racism.


While the book covers the global spread of tuberculosis (TB), Green also makes the root causes of the crisis the subject of his critique. These causes emerge from a psychological interpretation to illness, which influences the sociological response to such conditions. In Green’s assessment, the underlying cause for the TB crisis is bias, which manifests through forms of exclusion such as stigmatization and romanticization.


Green shows how the TB crisis has been used to complement the exclusion of marginalized communities on various bases of identity, specifically race, gender, and class. Before rich white communities had a clearer understanding of the science behind infection and illness, they tried to frame TB as an affliction exclusive to their community. Other communities, like Black and Indigenous communities, were said to have suffered from an entirely different disease that went unnamed on purpose. Green points out, “Acknowledging that consumption was common among enslaved, colonized, and marginalized people would have undermined not just a theory of disease, but also the project of colonialism itself” (74). In this way, medicine was weaponized not only to treat illness but also to preserve systems of oppression—maintaining a fiction that protected dominant narratives while letting truth, and lives, slip through the cracks. Once a more scientific explanation was discovered and disseminated throughout the general public, the rich white communities’ attitudes shifted, such that those who had TB were stigmatized. This allowed the spread of TB to be weaponized against communities of color, who were already disadvantaged by poor living conditions.


The exclusivity of TB to rich white communities also drove a shift in beauty standards. The implication of the “consumptive chic” trend is that TB was also weaponized to undermine women as the “weak” gender. The idealization of TB erased the experience of suffering and downplayed its impact on people who were restricted from playing an active role in society, including white women and people of color. This reframing of illness into aesthetic further exposes the societal impulse to romanticize pain when it occurs in certain bodies while vilifying it in others. This subtle form of bias misrepresented TB as an ideal when all it did was reinforce the patriarchal and colonialist structures of the time. Much later, TB would once again disproportionately affect gender when it exacerbated the symptoms of HIV/AIDS during the AIDS crisis. Although Green doesn’t explicitly discuss the impact of the crisis on members of the gay community, knowledge of the crisis’s underlying causes makes it easy to see how the same forces that enable the continued spread of TB applied to the AIDS crisis. The silence here is itself meaningful, pointing to the patterns of selective empathy and systemic neglect that continue to echo across pandemics.


Once the cure was discovered, bias was applied in the development of treatment methods and prevention strategies. Profit maximization became the main driving force for cure delivery, rather than care. As a result, the countries that needed the cure the most—the same countries that were economically disadvantaged as a result of colonization—were barred from accessing the cure. Green describes global health organizations as operating under a scarcity mindset: “Curing MDR-TB was challenging even in the best hospital. It was, they argued, basically impossible in middle-income countries like Peru. So why bother?” (168).


Green argues that inasmuch as TB is the oldest and deadliest disease known to the human body, there also exists an equally perennial illness of the spirit—bias. Bias drives people to make the choices that perpetuate vicious cycles, allowing a curable disease like TB to continue destroying millions of lives. The book is intended to discourage all forms of bias, whether intended or not, as part of the drive to eliminate TB. By identifying bias as both a cause and accelerant, Green reframes TB not just as a medical failure but as a moral one—making the case that the healing we require is as spiritual as it is scientific.

The Need for Empathetic Thinking

As part of Green’s call to resist falling back on bias and prejudice, he urges the reader to think more empathetically, putting the dignity of every human ahead of all other motivations. Empathy, he suggests, is a skill that requires intention and active effort. At the very end of the book, he invites the reader to imagine the scale of suffering that TB inflicts on the world every year: “Consider yourself for a moment—everything you’ve overcome, everything you’ve survived…Then, if you can, find a way to multiply that times 1,250,000” (189). To go by each day without willfully considering that projection is to live easily and viciously. Green’s framing urges the reader to shift from abstraction to embodiment—to feel TB not as a statistic but as a collection of human stories like their own.


Green hints at the ease of reductive thinking in Chapter 2. Soon after meeting Henry, as described in Chapter 1, Green developed a strong interest in the history of TB. Chapter 2 shows the subtle ways that TB has influenced history, though none of these facts are necessarily relevant to the reality of TB today. While they are compelling, suggesting that TB was responsible for World War I and the Stetson hat reduces the reality of TB to novelty. At the end of the chapter, Green stresses that it isn’t the aim of his book to simply tell interesting stories about an illness. To understand the way TB impacts the world in the present, Green has to think of it as being more than a subject of interest.


The call for empathetic thinking continues to develop when Green examines the dichotomy between control- and care-focused treatment. The former, which was exercised in sanatoria, views illness as an enemy to be defeated. Oftentimes, the determination to overcome TB extended onto the patient as an agent of illness. This resulted in the view that continued illness was a moral failure on the patient’s part and led to abuses of punishment. This logic punished vulnerability and conflated disease with blame—an outlook that continues to haunt many modern healthcare systems. The opposite perspective comes from Dr. Girum, who relentlessly pursued Henry’s case because “he [wa]s one person…what if he c[ould] be the first of many?” (151). To resign himself to the possibility of Henry’s death was to say that Henry was born simply just to suffer and die. In Dr. Girum’s eyes, Henry was much more than the end of his life.


Green mourns the death of Shreya Tripathi in Chapter 14, especially since he learned that she had been one of his readers. The idea that Green’s work resonated so strongly with Shreya during her brief life touches him, even as it reminds him of the loneliness that surrounded him during the writing of his novels. This fundamentally pushed him to stop thinking of TB as a historical fact and start thinking of it as a reality of the world in which he lives. In the same way that his past novels became an attempt to reach out to others across the void of loneliness, this book becomes Green’s way of reaching out across the borders of privilege, injustice, and inequity.

The Cumulative Power of Virtuous Cycles

Toward the end of the book, Green highlights the dichotomy between vicious cycles and virtuous cycles. The discussion on these two cycles is helpful in understanding the cumulative effect that individual actions have on the world.


The vicious cycles manifests in large-scale institutional events like Johnson & Johnson’s attempt to extend their bedaquiline patent in India and the World Health Organization’s decision to limit DOTS guidelines on treating patients with drug-resistant TB. It also includes individual decisions like Henry’s father resigning himself to Henry’s death. The vicious cycle accepts that systems are more powerful than individual choices. Had everyone in Henry’s life adopted his father’s point of view, it would have signaled their belief that nothing they did could ever hope to overcome his illness. This would render all scientific breakthrough moot, as it implies that cures and vaccines are only effective inasmuch as they can be conveniently distributed by the systems that produce them. There would be no point in putting hope in cures because the system decides who gets to live and who doesn’t. This is counterproductive to the endeavor of healthcare, which affords every human being the right to life. Green implies that fatalism, when widespread, becomes a form of complicity—justifying inaction in the face of solvable crises.


The virtuous cycle exists as a contrast to the vicious cycle. Green argues that individual choice can and has been capable of undoing the damage caused by systems. Through Shreya’s and Phumeza’s stories, bedaquiline became more readily available in India. They didn’t balk at the enormity of the corporate foe they were facing, even as Shreya continued to fight until her death. These examples emphasize how resistance can ripple outward, transforming not only one life but also policy, precedent, and access itself.


Green also shows that virtuous cycles depend on each other to work. In his own experience, the interdependence of virtuous systems in the United States enable him to access quick and convenient treatment for all kinds of injuries. Similarly, Phumeza wouldn’t have been able to access treatment for multiple drug-resistant TB if not for the work of Partners in Health in Peru. The same can be said about how Dr. Girum hoped that Henry’s treatment could be a case study for personalized treatment in Sierra Leone. This vision motivated him to keep working toward Henry’s recovery.


Though Green frames his discussion of systems in the context of the TB crisis, the virtuous cycle is not specifically designed to meet the challenges of the TB crisis. The virtuous cycle is fundamentally a sociological solution, which means that it can be applied across a wide range of contexts and human needs. This broad applicability reframes TB not just as a case study but as a window into what solidarity can look like when enacted consistently and deliberately.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Unlock every key theme and why it matters

Get in-depth breakdowns of the book’s main ideas and how they connect and evolve.

  • Explore how themes develop throughout the text
  • Connect themes to characters, events, and symbols
  • Support essays and discussions with thematic evidence