29 pages • 58-minute read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Content Warning: This section of the guide includes discussion of death, particularly child death.
“Examination Day” uses subtle foreshadowing throughout. Foreshadowing is a literary technique used to hint at what will unfold in a story. In “Examination Day,” the demeanor of Mr. and Mrs. Jordan foreshadows their son’s tragic end. Mrs. Jones has been crying while thinking about the exam, as the expression “the moistness of [her] eyes” (Paragraph 3) suggests. Mr. Jones is tense and on edge when discussing the exam with his son. This emotional tension suggests that the exam is a bad thing and they fear its outcome. At the same time, they want to protect their son’s innocence and hide the exam’s true nature, which leads them to deflect or avoid the subject
Mr. Jordan’s attempts to stifle his son’s curiosity are also foreshadowing. Dickie’s insistence on asking questions about the world and his father’s abrupt and incorrect answers suggest that Dickie’s curiosity will get him into trouble. For instance, when Dickie asks, “what makes [the grass] green,” Mr. Jordan responds abruptly, “Nobody knows” (Paragraph 13). He may truly be ignorant of the cause, or he is trying to shield his son from gaining too much knowledge. Either way, his dismissal of the questions is ominous. The foreshadowing comes to fruition when Dickie’s natural intelligence and perceptiveness result in his death.
Slesar was a celebrated writer of not only science fiction but also of mystery thrillers and soap operas. A key literary device in these genres is the plot twist, or a dramatic change in the expected trajectory of the plotline. Often, a plot twist retroactively changes the interpretation of previous events in the narrative. Slesar uses a plot twist at the end of “Examination Day,” to reveal the regime’s true nature and convey a message about the danger of authoritarian government.
When the “Government Intelligence test” (Paragraph 5), along with Mr. and Mrs. Jordan’s concerns about it, are introduced, the narrative relies on the general assumption that Dickie’s parents are concerned that Dickie will not get a high score on the exam. This is consistent with how IQ tests are typically perceived in the real world. However, in the antepenultimate paragraph, it is revealed that they are worried Dickie is too smart and will earn too high a score, which has disastrous results in their world. They suspect Dickie’s IQ is “above the Government regulation” (Paragraph 54) and he will be killed as a result. When they are proved correct, the twist provokes a reinterpretation of their worries earlier in the story.
“Examination Day” uses shifting character perspectives to create pathos (sympathy for the characters) and tension. The story opens in third-person omniscient narration. A third-person omniscient narrator has complete awareness of the story’s events and circumstances. It is used in “Examination Day” to open and close the narrative, like an establishing shot and closing shot in a movie or television show. It provides the context of the situation, such as “The Jordans never spoke of the exam, not until their son, Dickie, was twelve years old” (Paragraph 1).
The rest of the story is largely told in third-person limited narration from Dickie’s point of view. It describes Dickie’s feelings and actions from an outside perspective. For instance, the narrator notes that Dickie “wanted the day to be happy” (Paragraph 3) and that he felt “drowsy” after drinking the truth serum. This use of third-person limited perspective gives the reader greater insight into Dickie’s point of view. It also creates mystery and tension because the reader does not have insight into what motivates his parents’ strange behaviors throughout the story. Mr. and Mrs. Jordans’ dialog suggests they’re hiding what they know about the exam, but without providing access to their thoughts and feelings, the narrative stops short of revealing what they know. This allows the narrative to postpone revealing the true nature of the exam until the end of the narrative when it’s conveyed through the dialog of an outside character.
Slesar is recognized for his use of irony in his works, including “Examination Day.” Literary irony is the difference between reality and something’s appearance or expectation. For instance, the narrative opens on Dickie’s 12th birthday party. This should be a joyous, happy occasion and indeed, there are all the signs of a typical, happy birthday celebration. Mrs. Jordan gives Dickie “gaily-colored packages” to open and a “birthday cake was brought forth” (Paragraph 13). But, in an ironic twist, Dickie’s 12th birthday might be a marker of his impending death. Similarly, the description of the “cold and official” government waiting room is emotionally neutral and suggests nothing out of the ordinary (Paragraph 29). In reality, it is where Dickie—and presumably countless other boys his age—will be sent to his death. The blandness of the waiting room contrasts with the horror that awaits the test subjects.



Unlock all 29 pages of this Study Guide
Get in-depth, chapter-by-chapter summaries and analysis from our literary experts.