57 pages • 1-hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more. For select classroom titles, we also provide Teaching Guides with discussion and quiz questions to prompt student engagement.
The “Farewell Address” frequently evokes people and events without mentioning them by name; while a reference is direct, an allusion is indirect. For example, Washington never names the “artful and enterprising minority” that he accuses of trying to sabotage the government (Paragraph 16). He speaks only in vague terms about the war in Europe that loomed large in the politics of the day, and while he repeatedly asks for forgiveness for his “many errors,” he claims not to know what any of them are. These allusions allow Washington to deliver a thoroughly political message and allow his audience to fill in the blanks, while preserving a high-minded tone befitting Washington’s reputation. The allusions’ noncommittal nature also means his words lend themselves to a more generalized application. For example, his famous warning against “permanent alliances” was originally an allusive warning against an alliance with France, but it has gone down in history as a general rule for US foreign policy.
A rhetorical device that frequently appears in formal arguments, syllogism is a form of logical reasoning that links two or more premises to draw a conclusion. The “Farewell Address” puts forth a series of logical propositions, each of which follows from the one before, leading the audience to an indisputable conclusion. Washington prefaces his letter with the remark that because he is an experienced public servant and is about to retire from public life, it follows that his words are valuable and trustworthy. He then commences his advice by discussing The Importance of National Unity, and once he believes he has made his point, the rest of the argument falls into place: Because national unity is vital and only the Constitution can safeguard national unity, violating the laws (or trying to “innovate” them) is harmful to national unity. In practice, this means that if citizens reject the Federalists’ legislative work, including the highly controversial Jay Treaty, they risk dividing and weakening the country.
A common rhetorical tactic is to reduce an issue to two sides, where one is obviously preferable and the other is indefensible. Washington’s “Farewell Address” deploys this tactic routinely by describing national unity, under the new federal government, as the source of all political good, while those who oppose it are wicked conspirators bent on sabotaging the nation’s security and prosperity. There were, at the time, serious dangers to national unity: Some Westerners had threatened secession or joining with Spain to access the Mississippi River and the lands beyond, and the Whiskey Rebellion in Pennsylvania was an armed challenge to federal authority. However, Washington appears to use these examples to frame all his political opposition as subversive, and he ignores the many nuances separating his and Hamilton’s Federalists from Jefferson’s Democratic-Republicans.
The “Farewell Address” was first published in newspapers, but it is written in the form of a speech. It accordingly makes ample use of rhetorical questions, which are common in speeches because they build a connection to the audience without requiring anyone to supply an actual answer. The main function of a rhetorical question is to demonstrate the obviousness of a point by posing a question for which there can only be one logical answer. Washington frequently uses this device to impart The Importance of National Unity. For example, he asks, “Who that is a sincere friend to [a free government] can look with indifference upon attempts to shake the foundation of the fabric?” (Paragraph 27). The answer is obviously “no one,” so any “sincere friend” to free government must take threats to the national fabric very seriously.



Unlock all 57 pages of this Study Guide
Get in-depth, chapter-by-chapter summaries and analysis from our literary experts.