64 pages • 2-hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Content Warning: This section of the guide includes discussion of gender discrimination, emotional abuse, physical abuse, death, and child death.
In Mushtaq’s stories, the family is the preeminent site for gendered violence in Indian society. Rarely do these stories ever move away from the family, and even when they focus on working characters, such as the lawyer narrator in “The Arabic Teacher and Gobi Manchuri,” they are still preoccupied with their familial relations. In exploring the problem of gendered violence in the family, Mushtaq critiques the patriarchal power dynamics at play in marital and familial relations.
The opening story of the collection, “Stone Slabs for Shaista Mahal,” lays out the traditional view of spousal relations: “No matter which religion one belongs to, it is accepted that the wife is the husband’s most obedient servant, his bonded labourer” (7). At the same time, the narrator Zeenat criticizes this tradition, as she is reluctant to maintain a conservative status quo with her husband. Zeenat believes that she is liberated from these repressive structures because she is aware of them. However, the story gradually reveals how she has become complicit in reinforcing those structures by resigning herself to the comforts of domesticity. Shaista awakens Zeenat to the flaw of her aspiration, showing how much her own presence is merely functional and subservient to the whims of her husband, Iftikhar. Iftikhar claims to love Shaista more than anything in the world, yet his declarations ring hollow against his desire to suppress their daughter’s education and how speedily he remarries after compromising Shaista’s recovery from a difficult birth. The story thus suggests that, even in marriages that appear devoted and happy on the surface, unequal power dynamics deprive women of any true status as individual people.
Other stories underscore the idea that women experience violence in the family to varying degrees of intensity. In the title story, “Heart Lamp,” Mehrun’s husband, Inayat, is indifferent to her feelings as he recklessly engages in his affair, leaving her to feel trapped and experiencing suicidal ideation. Similarly, the narrator in “Be a Woman Once, Oh Lord!” faces unspeakable cruelty from her husband, who abandons her and her children for another woman once she develops a tumor. Yakub in “Black Cobras” also abandons Aashraf, simply because he is disappointed that she has given birth to three daughters in a row. His outspoken refusal of his parental duties directly results in the death of one of those children. This is mirrored to a lesser degree by the husband in “The Arabic Teacher and Gobi Manchuri,” who refuses to take any responsibility for his daughters’ upbringing on religious grounds.
Mushtaq also captures the way that some women internalize misogyny and use it to disadvantage other women for fear of losing their status in the household. In “A Decision of the Heart,” Akhila antagonizes her mother-in-law because she is jealous of the attention Mehaboob Bi gets from Yusuf. Even though Mehaboob Bi’s actions are completely innocuous, Akhila willfully misinterprets her relationship with Yusuf to the point of calling Mehaboob Bi her “co-wife.” Although Akhila recognizes the error of her ways, the story ends with Yusuf turning against her, perpetuating the cycle of gendered violence that grips their household.
Mushtaq thus exposes violence in various forms, from emotional abuse to physical violence and abandonment, suggesting that oppression can take many forms within the family unit. In closely examining the lives of women from various social classes and backgrounds, she suggests that the problem of patriarchal oppression and gendered violence permeates every level of society.
Mushtaq takes an intersectional approach to feminism, showing how women’s issues are fundamentally tied to the frameworks of economy and social class. She implies that it is impossible to achieve liberation from the patriarchy without also achieving a liberation from the behaviors that capitalism forces people to adopt, exposing the inextricable link between patriarchy and capitalism.
In Mushtaq’s stories, men frequently use their economic circumstances to justify the abuse and repression of their wives and daughters. When Shaista discusses her thoughts of undergoing tubal ligation surgery in “Stone Slabs for Shaista Mahal,” Iftikhar comments, “There is no need, Shaista. I am the one raising them…Thanks to God’s grace, I earn enough to look after all of them well” (9). This implies that because Iftikhar can afford their living costs, Shaista should take on the various burdens of motherhood regardless of how she feels about it.
A similar issue appears in “High-Heeled Shoe,” where Nayaz Khan becomes obsessed with acquiring the titular shoes for Arifa as a status symbol that will make him equals with his brother, Mehaboob. Nayaz’s obsession ignores Arifa’s feelings on the matter, and when he finally decides to get her a pair of high-heeled shoes, Arifa finds herself in an extreme state of discomfort. Symbolically, the shoes represent the burden of Nayaz’s obsession of controlling Arifa’s life and using her as yet another status symbol. She is expected to serve his ambitions at the cost of her own well-being.
The clearest story that speaks to the repulsion that fuels the capitalist patriarchy is “The Shroud,” in which Shaziya prioritizes her indulgence for luxury over Yaseen Bua’s request for a burial shroud. The story reveals that Bua, a working-class woman, became ostracized from society when she prioritized the welfare of her children over the observance of religious traditions for widows. Shaziya’s willingness to acquire Bua’s shroud signals the promise of cross-class solidarity, but when Shaziya fails to fulfill her request, she quickly shifts the blame to Bua to absolve herself of any guilt. Shaziya’s behavior reinforces the social structure that ostracized Bua in the first place. It isn’t until Bua dies that Shaziya realizes the severity of her inaction.
In this way, Mushtaq highlights how social hierarchies can lead women to neglecting or oppressing one another through class, in spite of the commonalities and challenges they share as persons of the same gender. Her stories imply that an obsession with materialism, status, and hoarding wealth undermines opportunities for social justice and prevents women from uniting together against the patriarchy that oppresses them all.
Mushtaq’s stories frequently consider the role that religion plays in modern life. Far from suggesting that faith systems should be abolished, Mushtaq asks how religion can evolve to fit the needs of a modern community. In doing so, she advocates for the importance of reforming religion for a modern society.
In “The Shroud,” Shaziya uses her faith to project her status in society, even though her private life suggests that she is less than faithful to the Muslim ideals of temperance and modesty. The irony of the story is that Shaziya’s Hajj is ultimately hollow, serving nothing but her own vanity as she procures souvenirs from Mecca. Shaziya reneges on her promise to Bua to acquire a funeral shroud, prioritizing a beautiful carpet to decorate her home. Shaziya grieves over her moral bankruptcy at the end of the story because she is too late to make up for the loss of her honor to a dead woman. On the other hand, Razia from “Red Lungi” demonstrates that Shaziya could have overcome her personal fault by looking to those less fortunate as opportunities to develop one’s character, rather than as burdens. Razia shows charity to Arif because she can see that he has been blessed by Allah, briefly upending their social hierarchy and turning Arif into a figure whose favor Razia desires.
Outside the realm of personal change, Mushtaq also calls out the way the authority of the mosque has been co-opted for the benefit of exploitative power structures like the patriarchy. In “Fire Rain,” the mutawalli Usman Saheb uses the rumor of Nisar’s death to get himself out of the responsibility of sharing his family property with Jameela. The extravagance of Nisar’s reburial is undermined by the discovery that Nisar is still alive, implying that the community has expended its resources on false premises. This underscores Usman’s failure to guide his congregation to true spiritual purity, leveraging their resources instead for personal gain.
Similarly, the mutawalli in “Black Cobras,” Abdul Khader Saheb, shows preference toward the abusive Yakub instead of defending his abandoned wife. When Yakub kills Munni, the community turns against Abdul, recognizing his failure as a spiritual authority.
Throughout the collection, Mushtaq thus drives the idea that religious reform begins in the hearts of the faithful. In criticizing the hypocrisy of some religious leaders, Mushtaq encourages her readers to stand up against abuses in power, presenting genuine faith as one that upholds moral values instead of engaging in unthinking conformity. What is more, characters like Shaziya and Razia demonstrate the importance of humility, charity, and kindness in living a truly devout life.



Unlock every key theme and why it matters
Get in-depth breakdowns of the book’s main ideas and how they connect and evolve.