Henry IV, Part 2

William Shakespeare

56 pages 1-hour read

William Shakespeare

Henry IV, Part 2

Fiction | Play | Adult | Published in 1600

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Symbols & Motifs

Content Warning: This section of the guide includes discussion of illness and death.

Rumour and Messages

Henry IV, Part 2 begins with a short Prologue, named the Induction, in which Rumour takes to the stage. Rather than a fully-fledged character, Rumour is, as the name suggests, the personification of rumor and “false reports”—an allegorical figure who introduces the motif of rumor, reports, and messages. 


The play is set during a period of turmoil. As well as the rebellion of his former allies and fellow Englishmen, Henry IV is dealing with threats from Wales, Scotland, and France; these are existential wars that threaten a king who himself took the throne by force. At such a time, the need for accurate information is paramount, yet false reports also spread rapidly through the nation. Many of these false rumors are benign, such as Falstaff telling people that he killed Hotspur, but others are emotionally devastating. According to Rumour, the “smooth comforts” of these false reports are “worse than true wrongs” (I.Induction.40-41). Information thus exists in an unstable, unreliable state from the opening lines of the play, creating a sense of unease and uncertainty that pervades the narrative


The conflicting messages that Northumberland receives about the fate of his son exemplify Rumour’s warning. When attempting to discern which reports are real, he scrutinizes Morton’s face to see the “strange confession” in his eye. He probes the messenger for emotional sincerity, hoping that this will cut through the confusion of unreliable messages. His struggle echoes throughout the play, as characters strive for a certainty and an emotional sincerity that the communications and messages they receive do not offer. The rebel lords, for example, shape their plans and communications around news of troop movements and pledges of loyalty, yet these reports are conflicting. Ultimately, they are forced into action by their circumstances rather than the news they receive. Later, they are told that their complaints will be addressed by the king, only for Prince John to arrest them for treason. Conflicting messages seal their fate.


Perhaps the only character who receives consistently positive messages is King Henry IV. Throughout the play, he is told that his enemies are being defeated. Not only does his son deal with the threat of the rebel lords, but Owen Glendower—such a big threat to England in the previous play—dies offstage. The death of the Welsh leader is conveyed in passing, revealing that a threat that was once so fearsome is now little more than a minor concern for a king with complete victory in his grasp. In spite of this slew of positive messages, the king is rarely able to enjoy the news that he receives. With his health failing and his death approaching, he begins to feel pained by each message conveying a new victory. Rather than confirming his triumph, the messages remind him how little he has accomplished. He took the throne with plans to join the Crusades to Jerusalem, only to get bogged down in domestic uprisings. His success in dealing with these uprisings only makes him feel as though his time could have been better spent. Each positive message thus becomes a symbol of time wasted and misspent. The ultimate irony of his victory is that he has won the wars that did not interest him, and each message serves as a reminder of this.

Sickness

The title character of Henry IV, Part 2 spends most of the play beset by exhaustion and illness, which gradually give way to death. The vivacious, energetic young leader of the previous plays is gone; he sends his sons to fight his battles and cannot even enjoy his rule because his insomnia keeps him awake at night. The king envies his subjects because they are not suffering as he suffers. The weight of responsibility, in this sense, weighs heavily upon him, and his sickness becomes a metaphor for the pressures of rule. Other characters, including Falstaff, are also described as ill, reinforcing the motif and its relationship to Confronting Aging and Mortality; faced with ill health, both men are grappling with the legacy they will leave behind. 


The sickness of the king also symbolizes the internal ills afflicting the social order. The kingdom of England is rife with insurrection, and King Henry’s greatest foes are the English rebels who were once his allies. Figures such as the Archbishop of York are evidence of the sickness of the kingdom as a whole even as they see themselves as redressing the problem. The Archbishop of York, for instance, describes rebellion as a way of curing the sickness that has defined England since Richard II’s rule:


[W]e are all diseas’d 
And with our surfeiting and wanton hours 
Have brought ourselves into a burning fever, 
And we must bleed for it (IV.1.54-57). 


When the Archbishop is arrested, he is accused of causing this sickness, having led the rebels astray through religious means. He has been poisoning the religiosity of the kingdom, Westmorland says, turning Christianity into a tool “of base and bloody insurrection” (IV.1.40). The true “sickness” of the nation is spiritual, Shakespeare implies: Something is deeply rotten in the society depicted in the play.


In this context, the motif also bears metaphorically on Prince Hal’s character arc. King Henry imagines his son as the ruler and feels pessimistic about his already sickly country. From the king’s perspective, Prince Hal is a wayward youth who will worsen the moral health of England. In this sense, the reconciliation between father and son is achieved through an assurance of Prince Hal’s ability to “heal” the nation. Prince Hal’s growth and maturation are, from his father’s perspective, a miraculous recovery. In this way, the play frames King Henry V as a potential cure for the sicknesses of the nation.

The Crown

The crown of the King of England is an important symbol in the play for both the audience and the characters. For King Henry IV, the crown represents everything that he has fought to achieve. After leading an uprising to take the throne, he wears the crown as a symbol of his victory. Now, however, others are striving to take the crown from him, and he feels “uneasy,” burdened by both the responsibility and precarity associated with ruling the land. That the crown is a burden has only become apparent after it has been won; thus, King Henry begins to sympathize with Richard II, the man from whom he took the crown and who prophesied that Henry would struggle with the weight of responsibility. King Henry once dismissed this warning as the words of a sore loser, but now he sees the words as wise. With his health rapidly fading and his ambitions left unfulfilled, the crown seems more and more like a reminder of how much the king has failed.


As King Henry’s health becomes worse, he takes to bed, and the crown is placed on the pillow beside him. Removing the crown is a symbolic gesture: Now dying, King Henry is preparing to lay aside the burden of rule. Nevertheless, the crown’s proximity to his head underscores that he remains the king. Thus, when Prince Hal comes to speak with his dying father and sees the crown on the pillow, he is struck by the symbolism of the scene. Seeing the crown on the pillow, Prince Hal recognizes that the immaturity of his youth must immediately be cast aside. Like his father, he recognizes the crown as a burden; unlike his father, he will ascend to the throne as someone who already recognizes the crown as a symbol of responsibility rather than a symbol of power. This augurs well for his rule, as he has already learned the lesson that his father learned in his dying days.


As Hal mourns his father, the king recovers just long enough to see that the crown has been removed from his pillow. With his health poor, this moment threatens to strike a symbolic blow from which he may not recover. He believes that the prince has taken the crown because he cannot even wait for his father to die. To the king, the empty pillow is a symbol of his son’s callous ambition, and he rages that the kingdom will be doomed due to the preciousness and cold-heartedness of his son. Yet Prince Hal returns with the crown, which he willingly relinquishes to his father, explaining that he was grieving his father’s apparent death while also fretting about his future responsibilities. The return of the crown is a symbolic gesture that reconciles father and son. Ironically, by giving up the crown, Hal is showing that he is mature enough to become king because he does not covet power. After the coronation, as the newly crowned king disowns Falstaff and pledges himself to war with France, he shows that the quiet moment in the bed chamber was not a false dawn. The crown fits the new king, who has grown enough as a character to wear it with responsibility and care.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Unlock the meaning behind every key symbol & motif

See how recurring imagery, objects, and ideas shape the narrative.

  • Explore how the author builds meaning through symbolism
  • Understand what symbols & motifs represent in the text
  • Connect recurring ideas to themes, characters, and events