67 pages • 2-hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Smith visits the National Museum of African American History and Culture (NMAAHC) with his mother’s father and father’s mother. Smith notes that the NMAAHC “capture[s] so much of Black America’s complex relationship with this country” (271) and “recognizes that Blackness […] is the foundation upon which the country was built” (272). Having walked past a statue of Thomas Jefferson bearing the names of those he enslaved, a display of a KKK robe, and a picture of a lynching, Smith and his grandparents arrive at the room dedicated to Emmett Till. As they look at the casket, Smith’s grandfather tells him that Till used to live a few miles away from him. This prompts Smith to think about his grandparents’ experiences of the country.
Before conversing with his grandfather in the living room in New Orleans, he includes an excerpt providing historical context for the year of his grandfather’s birth—slavery had only ended 60 years prior, and the Great Depression and Great Migration were at their height. Smith describes his grandfather, born in Monticello, Mississippi, as professorial and distinguished in his demeanor. Smith’s grandfather talks about his experience of school, noting that education for Black children was sparse. His ability to immerse himself in books and continue his education depended on the benevolence of white women, his middle school principal, and his older sister. He shares stories of indignities and intimidation he faced growing up, moving “from one anecdote to the next, processing memories out loud as he unearthed them from places he had not visited for many years” (276). Smith is surprised by but understanding of his grandfather’s assertion that Black people could protect themselves from white harm by having white people who would vouch for them, as long as Black people deferred to their authority.
Before conversing with his grandmother, Smith includes an excerpt contextualizing her year of birth—white terror, policies to legalize the terror, and the emerging world war. Smith describes his grandmother, born in Quincy, Florida, as kind, tender, and unassuming, “but she is not silent” (279). After recounting the death of her father and mother and how she came to live with her grandfather, who was a sharecropper, Smith’s grandmother expresses the things she’d want to know about her grandfather’s life but never asked. The questions include those about his living conditions, segregation, education, and parents. She recounts an experience she had with him on a segregated bus ride where her grandfather was made to stand for eight hours. She also discusses the verbal and physical harassment she experienced from white drivers and schoolchildren on roads in the rural South.
As their conversation continues, Smith’s grandmother shares a story she heard from her grandfather about a lynch mob and a Black man who survived. Smith doesn’t know whether the story is true or not, but he accepts it for the purpose it serves—to “engender a sense of caution to keep them safe” (285). Smith’s grandmother also reveals that she found the trip to NMAAHC depressing, emphasizing that she lived it. This prompts Smith to reflect on how the museum exhibits are not abstractions for his grandparents, but rather mirrors that affirm both their experience and their survival.
As Smith concludes the chapter, he thinks about how his “grandparents’ voices are a museum [he is] still learning how to visit” (288). Although he admits that he forgets that they embody the impact of slavery and racial violence, he acknowledges how they illuminate that slavery was not so long ago. Because slavery is central to the founding of the US, it must be in people’s memories. Furthermore, the effort to confront the history of slavery and its contemporary impact must be a collective endeavor. There are plenty of opportunities to learn about the history of slavery from scholars, public historians, museums, educators, and elders. The matter of reckoning with slavery, then, is not a question of ability, but rather a question of willingness.
With the epilogue, Smith highlights some culminating insights that he gleans from his experiences of the historical sites in previous chapters. The decision to speak with his grandparents to highlight these conclusions suggests that the experience at the historical sites prompted a theoretical understanding of the significance and role of lineage and memory, so speaking with his grandparents is an effort to put theory into practice.
What is required, then, to know and pass on memory is to actively ask for the information from elders. In short, this is how the word is passed—by learning the memories of those in one’s lineage. This comes as a particularly significant point because, as Smith notes in the chapters on Monticello, Angola, Blandford, and Gorée, white supremacist narratives also rely on particular conceptions of who their elders and ancestors are and were, and who Black people are and were, based on what they have received from their lineage. Smith notes that a faulty understanding of elders and ancestors contributes to obscuring their actual experience. Calling back to the chapter on the Whitney when he thinks about the ways that he has over-mythologized his ancestors, he points out the same phenomenon with his living elders: “In my childhood imagination he was a mountain that no storm could erode. And yet here was this story of my grandfather, an anecdote that transformed him from the mythos of my memory into a small and fragile boy […]” (276).
By pointing out the mythos of his childhood memory while also emphasizing the importance of memory, Smith illuminates the insights he has gleaned from previous locations about the creation and uses of memory in historical interpretation. By emphasizing his grandparents’ memory, he suggests that the role that white supremacist myth plays in the seizing of public memory is counterbalanced by the personal memories of Black elders. Although myth can be used in directions that obscure the experiences of Black people, as was the case with Blandford and Angola, it can also serve as a useful tool for reckoning with slavery and increasing understanding, as Galveston and Gorée seem to highlight. Although myth can create unreliable memories, the factuality of those memories is less important than what they symbolize. He underscores the point in the Epilogue when he admits that he doesn’t know if his great-great-grandfather’s story about the Black man who escaped a lynch mob is true, but he understands the purpose that the story serves (285).
He calls his grandparents’ stories “memorials” (288). The analogy here to memorials, museums, and exhibits suggests that engagement with elders’ memories is a form of public history, despite its personal character. In fact, the personal nature of confronting slavery and white supremacy is not tangential, but rather central, to the collective effort. Throughout How the Word Is Passed, Smith has emphasized the personal investment that undergirds people’s desire to confront or deny slavery’s role and impact in past and present society. He has also emphasized that such a personal investment is connected to lineage and defined by how the understanding of one’s lineage has been in reciprocal relationship with historical narrative, which inevitably involves memory, a midpoint between fact and myth. The Epilogue underscores this connection between the personal and the public as Smith takes an intimate picture of his grandparents and contextualizes it within a broader historical, political, economic, and social landscape. In doing so, he blurs the demarcation between personal and public, as well as past and present, making the reckoning with a slavery a universal, contemporary matter.



Unlock all 67 pages of this Study Guide
Get in-depth, chapter-by-chapter summaries and analysis from our literary experts.