The novel presents Tim Charvat as a mentor. Examine the complexities of his guidance, paying close attention to moments where his advice becomes confrontational or “didactic,” such as the argument in the church. Are such moments functions of his narrative role, or do they say something about the nature of human connection?

Explore the novel’s argument that choosing to live is a conscious, continuous act rather than a default state of being.

Discuss the function of New York City as a setting in the novel. How does the narrative contrast the corporate environment of Manhattan with the community-oriented neighborhoods of Brooklyn to develop theme, characterization, etc.?

How do Bud’s relationships with Howard, Tim, and Tuan challenge traditional notions of male vulnerability and emotional expression? What purpose does this serve?

In Chapter 3, Bud distinguishes between a factual “biography” and an experiential “identity.” How do the various forms of memorialization presented in the novel validate this distinction and define what it means to honor a life?

The novel concludes with Howard creating the “Life Stories” section as a counterpoint to the trend of disposable digital content. Analyze this resolution as a commentary on the crisis in modern media. Does the novel offer a realistic vision for the future of journalism and the art of the obituary?

Consider Bud’s relationship with Clara. What tropes of the romance genre does the novel incorporate, and to what end?

Beyond its function as a coping mechanism for grief, how does dark humor shape the novel’s tone? What value does the novel locate in humor?