58 pages • 1-hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
In Imminent, Luis Elizondo describes his pivotal role in raising public awareness about unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP). His work, both within and outside the US Department of Defense (DoD), has contributed significantly to the conversation about UAP and their potential implications for national security, scientific inquiry, and public discourse. Elizondo is best known for his involvement in the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP), a secretive program within the DoD that investigated UAP sightings and reports. In 2017, Elizondo resigned from the Pentagon, citing frustration with what he described as a lack of support from senior officials for investigating UAP. In December 2017, The New York Times published an article revealing the existence of the AATIP, based in part on information provided by Elizondo.
Elizondo has faced significant criticism for his high-profile role in the UAP disclosure movement. One of the primary areas of controversy revolves around his claims about his role in the AATIP. While Elizondo has asserted that he was the program’s director, some former Pentagon officials have disputed this. Reporter Keith Kloor, writing for The Intercept in 2019, obtained the following statement from Pentagon spokesperson Christopher Sherwood: “Mr. Elizondo had no responsibilities with regard to the AATIP while he worked in OUSDI [the Office of Undersecretary of Defense for Intelligence] up until the time he resigned effective 10/4/2017” (Kloor, Keith. “The Media Loves This UFO Expert.” The Intercept, 1 June 2019). These statements have fueled skepticism about Elizondo’s credibility, with critics suggesting that he may have exaggerated his role to promote his post-government career. In Imminent, Elizondo vehemently defends his claims, accusing the Pentagon of a coordinated effort to discredit him. Supporters of Elizondo argue that the Pentagon’s attempts to downplay his involvement in the AATIP are politically motivated and designed to limit further scrutiny of the government’s knowledge of UAP.
Another area of criticism comes from skeptics who question the nature of the UAP encounters themselves. While the declassified Navy videos have captured the public’s imagination, critics argue that these sightings often have more mundane explanations, such as advanced drones, optical illusions, or sensor malfunctions. When sightings cannot be conclusively explained, it is because of a lack of adequate data, not because the data present clear evidence of an inexplicable phenomenon. As of now, there is no compelling evidence to suggest that UAP are extraterrestrial in origin. Elizondo’s claims of a widespread government coverup—including the claim that the government has recovered extraterrestrial bodies from UAP crash sites—are not supported by any publicly available evidence.
Additionally, Elizondo has faced criticism from some within the UFO community itself. While many view him as a whistleblower and a key figure in pushing for UAP disclosure, others have expressed skepticism about his motivations. Some have noted the clear commercial incentives around Elizondo’s work, including his partnership with the for-profit To the Stars Academy run by former Blink-182 guitarist Tom DeLonge. Others have accused Elizondo of being a disinformation agent, suggesting that his work is part of a broader government effort to control the narrative around UAP and obscure the truth about extraterrestrial visitation. These critics often argue that Elizondo’s focus on UAP as potential security threats serves to perpetuate a fear-based narrative that distracts from more profound questions about humanity’s place in the universe.
In Imminent, Elizondo refers to Roswell as the catalyst for the modern interest in UAP/UFO. On July 8, 1947, the Roswell Army Air Field issued a press release stating that it had recovered a “flying disc” from a ranch near Roswell. The press release caused an immediate media frenzy, with newspapers across the country running headlines about the military recovering a “flying saucer.” The very next day, the US military retracted its initial statement and clarified that the object recovered was not a flying disc, but rather the remnants of a weather balloon. To bolster this explanation, the military displayed pieces of debris, including what they described as parts of the balloon and a radar reflector.
The incident seemed to fade from the public’s attention until it was revived in the late 1970s, when UFO researchers began to revisit the case. According to these researchers, the US government had covered up the true nature of the Roswell crash, which they claimed involved the recovery of a spacecraft and the bodies of extraterrestrial beings (a theory that Elizondo believes to be true). This alternate narrative has since become a cornerstone of UFO conspiracy theories, spawning books, documentaries, and extensive debate over what really happened at Roswell. The initial explanation provided by the US military was that the debris found by rancher William “Mac” Brazel consisted of a simple weather balloon. The military explained that the unusual debris found at the crash site included elements of the balloons, such as neoprene rubber, metallic foil, and wooden sticks, which could have been mistaken for something more exotic by civilians. Only much later, during the Clinton administration, did the government reveal the rest of the story: The weather balloon was part of a top-secret government project known as Project Mogul, which was designed to detect Soviet nuclear tests by using high-altitude balloons equipped with sensitive listening devices. Though far more mundane than an alien spacecraft, Project Mogul was top secret at the time of the crash, and conspiracy theories proliferated to fill in the information gap.
In the late 1970s, the Roswell story reemerged when UFO enthusiasts and researchers began to investigate the event in greater detail. A major catalyst for this revival was retired Lieutenant Colonel Jesse Marcel, the intelligence officer who had originally examined the debris. In interviews, he claimed that the material he saw at the crash site was unlike anything he had ever encountered and could not have come from a weather balloon. This resurgence of interest was further fueled by the publication of several books that argued that the military had recovered not only debris from an alien craft but also alien bodies, which were allegedly taken to various secretive government locations for study—a conspiracy claim that Elizondo repeats in Imminent. Over time, new witnesses came forward with additional, often sensational claims.
As the Roswell incident gained traction in popular culture, it became more than just a UFO event: It became a symbol of distrust in government and an emblem of the broader UFO phenomenon. The Cold War era’s paranoia about secrecy and technology blended with the rising interest in space and science fiction to create a perfect storm for conspiracy theories. Roswell became a touchstone in the growing subculture of UFO enthusiasts. By the 1990s, it had firmly entered the mainstream consciousness, making it an enduring part of American folklore.
Elizondo refers to his notable connection to Guantanamo Bay throughout Imminent. Before his involvement in UAP research, Elizondo was reportedly involved in intelligence operations connected to the “War on Terror,” which may have included activities related to detainee interrogations. While the specifics of his role at Guantanamo Bay are not widely known, Elizondo’s background in counterintelligence during the War on Terror places him in the broader context of US actions during this controversial period. In later years, Elizondo’s public statements and advocacy for greater government transparency in matters of UAP have led some to draw parallels between his positions on national security and the secrecy surrounding the War on Terror, including Guantanamo Bay.
The Guantanamo Bay Naval Base has existed since 1898. While the base originally served as a strategic military outpost, its role expanded dramatically in the wake of the 9/11 attacks. In January 2002, the US military began transferring detainees suspected of terrorism to Guantanamo Bay. The detainees held at the base included individuals captured in Afghanistan, Iraq, and other locations deemed to be involved in terrorist activities or aligned with groups like al-Qaeda and the Taliban. At its peak, Guantanamo held nearly 780 detainees, most of whom were imprisoned without formal charges or trials. The US government classified these individuals as “enemy combatants,” a designation that, according to the Bush administration, stripped them of the protections afforded to prisoners of war under the Geneva Conventions. The decision to use Guantanamo as a detention facility sparked immediate criticism from human rights organizations, legal scholars, and international bodies. One of the key points of contention was the indefinite detention of individuals without due process. Many detainees languished in the facility for years without being charged with a crime, while others were eventually released without explanation. This lack of transparency and legal accountability led to widespread accusations of human rights abuses and violations of international law.
The most damning allegations against Guantanamo Bay stem from its use of torture, which the government euphemistically labeled “enhanced interrogation.” In the years following the establishment of the detention center, reports emerged detailing the harsh methods used to extract information from detainees. These techniques included waterboarding, stress positions, sleep deprivation, sensory overload, and extreme isolation. While the US government initially defended these practices as legal and necessary for national security, many legal experts and human rights groups condemned them as forms of torture, violating both US law and international agreements like the United Nations Convention Against Torture. The US government argued that such measures were essential for preventing future terrorist attacks and gathering critical intelligence, but critics countered that these methods were both immoral and ineffective. Studies have shown that information obtained under torture is unreliable, as individuals may provide false confessions simply to end the suffering.
Guantanamo Bay has faced continuous criticism from human rights advocates, politicians, and the international community. Detractors argue that the facility’s existence undermines the rule of law and violates fundamental human rights. As of 2024, the facility remains operational.



Unlock all 58 pages of this Study Guide
Get in-depth, chapter-by-chapter summaries and analysis from our literary experts.