61 pages • 2-hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Content Warning: This section of the guide includes gender discrimination, rape, mental illness, sexual content, illness, and death.
In September 1970, Marie Harriman, Averell Harriman’s wife, died of a heart attack. He was heartbroken. In the spring of 1971, he reconnected with Pamela at the Georgetown, Washington, D.C., home of Kay Graham, publisher of The Washington Post. They quickly reignited their relationship. They had an active sex life, which seemed to “rejuvenate” the 79-year-old man. They were engaged six weeks later. They married on September 27, 1971.
Averell introduced Pamela to D.C. power brokers and powerful politicians like former presidents Truman and Johnson. Their wedding reception was held at the Harriman mansion on 81st Street in New York. Pamela applied for American citizenship so she could “join[] him in the political fray” (243).
Averell Harriman was the heir to the Union Pacific Railroad fortune and exceedingly wealthy. Although Averell was notoriously “tight-fisted,” Pamela used his money to give extravagant gifts to her son, Winston, such as an airplane. Author Sophia Purnell thinks Pamela wanted to “win her son’s love with money” (245).
In October, Pamela hosted an enormous wedding reception at Averell’s Washington, D.C. house, 3038 N Street NW, in Georgetown. Hundreds flocked to the “glamorous” event. Pamela wanted to make Averell into a political power player. She decorated the home with pictures of Averell with important world leaders. They gave most of Marie Harriman’s art collection to the National Gallery. However, Van Gogh’s White Roses was given pride of place in the drawing room. Pamela drew on her own Churchill connections to increase her political power. She transformed the Georgetown house into a model of political lobbying with good food, good design, and good service. Averell also agreed to buy a country estate in Virginia called Willow Oaks as a rural retreat for the couple and for hosting events.
Peter Duchin, a bandleader who had been practically raised by Marie Harriman when he was orphaned as a young child, felt “betrayed” by the changes Pamela was making to the properties. He was also upset by being gifted a tie for Christmas when Winston was given a plane. Pamela wanted meetings between Peter and Averell to be “planned in advance” (254) and restricted his access to the house. Peter felt Pamela was his “foe.”
In December 1971, Pamela became a US citizen. She held a dinner party to celebrate with prominent Democrats as guests.
At the time, Averell was obsessed “with ousting [Republican President] Nixon” (256). In 1972, Averell backed Senator Ed Muskie as the Democratic nominee, and Pamela supported his choice. Averell provided a substantial campaign donation and campaigned to be selected as a delegate. However, Pamela drew larger crowds than her husband. When McGovern was selected as the Democratic nominee at the convention, they felt he was “no match” for Nixon, and indeed, McGovern lost the general election. Following Muskie’s loss in the primary contest, Pamela resolved to follow her own political instincts instead of those of her husband. She helped Robert Strauss in his campaign for Democratic National Committee chair; he recognized that her political abilities outstripped those of her husband.
People were drawn to Pamela’s stories about the “towering figures of the previous 30 years,” such as the Churchills and the Kennedys (260). Pamela became recognized as a fixture in the Georgetown social circuit. She included “Hollywood royalty” such as Robert Redford at her parties, which gave her parties additional glamor.
In 1974, the Watergate scandal broke, and Nixon resigned. The Harrimans were “regularly welcomed” to parties at the White House under his successor, Gerald Ford. Pamela made her husband feel he was “still relevant” even as his advanced age and declining hearing meant she was the real force behind their political efforts. He became “nicer” with her mitigating influence. However, he was skeptical that women should be permitted to take part in politics. After a few awkward faux pas wherein he demanded women leave the men to talk after dinner, as was historically tradition, and the women refused, Pamela intervened to put an end to the practice. Purnell argues that Pamela was realizing that “women’s liberation could help her in making her own political choices” (266).
In July 1976, Pamela endorsed Bella Abzug, a “progressive feminist,” in the New York Senate race. During the campaign, Pamela criticized Abzug’s competitor, Moynihan, to Washington Post reporter Sally Quinn. It sparked a minor scandal, and Moynihan won the election. She realized she would need to be more careful when talking to the media.
Pamela backed Jimmy Carter for president and was glad when he won, although they never became close. She allowed rising State Department stars Richard Holbrooke and Marshall Shulman to live at her Georgetown home, which provided her with some access to the Carter administration. Pamela and Averell were seen as particular experts on Russia, given Averell’s experience in the USSR, but Averell was given largely “ceremonial duties.”
Pamela continued to host political events. She was named Democratic Woman of the Year in 1980. Some were critical of the selection due to her salacious past. Indeed, as her husband aged, she likely rekindled her physical relationship with Gianni.
Pamela “upgrade[d]” her public image. Eager to show an interest in art and culture, she befriended Carter Brown, who was tasked with improving the National Gallery’s art collection.
In the late 1970s, there was a backlash against second-wave feminism, and Pamela followed the tide. She presented herself as “a very quiet wife” and “traditional spouse” (279). She also sought to soften her image in advance of Brooke Hayward’s publication of her tell-all memoir Haywire (1977), which was highly critical of Pamela. Publicly, Pamela told friendly reporters she was not hurt by Brooke’s allegations of her vanity and “grasping” nature, although privately she was hurt. Her allies persuaded Brooke not to continue to write about Pamela. Purnell speculates that the tensions with Leland’s children prompted Pamela to “harden her attitude” (281) toward Averell’s children and grandchildren as well. They came to see Pamela as controlling of their father and grandfather. However, Averell told a friend that marrying Pamela was “the best” decision he ever made.
Pamela’s son Winston’s right-wing positions were increasingly at odds with Pamela’s liberalism. For instance, he lost a leadership position due to his support of Rhodesia. Pamela also felt increasingly concerned about Winston’s financial extravagances, many of which she paid for. Most controversial was Winston’s Swiss ski chalet, La Colombière. Pamela was also embarrassed by her son’s affair with Soraya, the wife of Saudi arms dealer Adnan Khashoggi.
Meanwhile, the Harriman family finances were managed by Clark Clifford and his law partner Paul Warnke; Averell had selected them for their political connections rather than their financial expertise. This decision would lead to financial problems for the family.
In 1980, Ronald Reagan won the US presidential election. Pamela responded by calling a “war council” of Democratic leaders. She was assisted by her chief of staff, the politically savvy Janet Howard. Janet helped Pamela create a Political Action Committee (PAC) officially called Democrats for the Eighties but known “derisorily at first” as PamPAC (290). She hired Alfred Friendly and Bob Shrum as speechwriters. Foreign policy expert Sandy Berger, chairman of PamPAC, introduced Pamela to 34-year-old former Arkansas governor Bill Clinton. Pamela was impressed with his political abilities, and he became their “public face.” She advised him that it is important to learn from failure.
In January 1982, Pamela delivered a speech to the Joint Session of Congress for the centennial of Franklin Roosevelt’s birth, becoming one of the few women to do so.
Pamela gained media attention for her glamorous political events and “power suits.” She was recognized by Democratic leadership for her political canny and fundraising abilities. She also showed she could be ruthless when PamPAC paid for an attack ad against Democratic Maryland Senator Paul Sarbanes’s opponent. She proved to be highly effective in selecting winning candidates and helped the Democrats gain seats in the House and Senate, including supporting Senator Joe Biden’s 1983 campaign.
Pamela became known for her “Issues Evenings,” where she convened donors, party leaders, and rising stars. She was able to flatter donors so they would feel confident donating to candidates she selected. In 1982, Bill Clinton won re-election for governor. Pamela felt he could run for president.
Pamela modernized the Democratic party operations by building a television studio for the creation of sophisticated campaign advertisements and creating the Democratic Fact Book with party line facts and research. Party officials felt she had become a “substitute party leader” (308).
Pamela constantly pushed herself to learn more, especially about foreign policy with the Soviet Union. In June 1983, Pamela and Averell traveled to Moscow on a fact-finding mission. They met with Soviet leader Yuri Andropov. Andropov was impressed with Pamela; Averell told the leader that Pamela would take over his contact “with the Soviet leadership” when he died (311). Upon their return, Pamela briefed the Secretary of State George Shultz and others on what they had learned. However, they did not publicly reveal that Andropov was sick, which earned them the respect of the Soviets. When Andropov died, Reagan did not attend his funeral. Pamela publicly criticized the president in an interview with Diane Sawyer on CBS for not doing more to improve relations with the USSR. She wanted to keep an open dialogue between the countries to avoid war.
By Christmas 1983, Averell’s cancer had significantly advanced. Pamela was torn between her political organizing and caring for her husband, whose illness and pain made him “bad-tempered.” In early 1984, Pamela purchased a house in Mango Bay, Barbados. She felt he would be comfortable there, while she continued to work from the island. They traveled there on the jet plane Averell had purchased for Pamela as a 63rd birthday present in 1983. Her call sign was N-PH-84, representing “the main focus of her life: the [1984] presidential election” (318).
Act 3 focuses on Pamela’s time in Washington, D.C., as a political organizer and fundraiser, countering the Misogyny in Historical Memory Making evident in previous depictions of Pamela’s life. Previous biographies of Pamela focused overwhelmingly on her sexual relationships, glamorous celebrity connections, and her role as a “socialite” or “dilettante,” particularly during her younger years. In Kingmaker, these episodes are minimized into two shorter Acts in favor of giving the majority of attention to Pamela’s older adulthood, from the age of 50 onward, when she had the most independence and personal power. The narrative’s emphasis on this period when Pamela exercised her own power rather than manipulating the power of others, also highlights The Changing Role of Women in Politics during the later years of Pamela’s life. As a result, Purnell presents Pamela as a smart, hardworking, and politically canny woman rather than a shallow “gold digger” who rode the coattails of powerful men.
Purnell overtly acknowledges Pamela’s use of Sexual Politics as a Route Into Formal Power. In Act 1, Pamela is portrayed as having seduced Averell Harriman, the American charged with managing the Lend-Lease program, which the UK relied on for munitions. After their affair ended and they had a falling out, they reconnected in 1971. Although he was no longer as politically relevant due to his advanced age, Averell still had deep ties to the Democratic Party and presidential politics. Pamela, now in her 50s, was still able to use her sex appeal and intelligence to seduce him. Purnell recounts a story as told to her by Peter Duchin (Averell’s adopted son), who commented on Pamela’s reunion with Averell: “Since they had last been to bed together, Pamela had perfected her techniques and now Averell was, to his joy, the beneficiary” (241). She quotes Peter, saying: “I bet Ave hadn’t experienced too many blowjobs in his life” (241). This more explicit level of detail illustrates how Pamela used her sex appeal to forge connections with powerful men. However, Purnell also portrays this intimacy as part of a genuine connection between the two rather than purely calculated and manipulative, nuancing her portrait of Pamela.
Pamela leveraged Averell’s connections to make her entrée into the “Georgetown circuit”—a shorthand for the political network essential to Washington politics. Guests at Pamela’s networking functions paid lip service to Averell as the reason they were there, but it quickly became clear Pamela was the real powerhouse behind the couple. As Purnell writes, “[Pamela] pretended the company had come for the Governor—who by now could barely see or hear—but it was no longer true” (301). Averell was not at the height of his physical power at the time. Pamela, by contrast, was younger, energetic, and better able to manage working long hours.
As part of her formal entry into politics, Pamela formed a PAC (political action committee) called Democrats for the 80s or, more commonly, PamPAC—a transition that highlights The Changing Role of Women in Politics. A PAC is a 501(c)4 or non-profit organization that spends money on political campaigns for issues or candidates. While they have existed since the 1940s, PACs came into their own in the 1980s as important vehicles for campaign fundraising. There are key parallels between Pamela’s use of her sex appeal during World War II to benefit the UK war effort and her use of these same skills as a fundraiser for the Democratic Party and other key social causes. Just as Pamela had held parties at “The Attic” in London to charm American generals and political leadership into supporting Britain as a young woman, she now held parties at her Georgetown home to convince wealthy people to donate to the Democratic Party. Purnell implies these parallels when she writes, “she had once again cast her spell over powerful and wealthy men” (302).
Even as Pamela was coming into her own independent power, she pulled back on some of her growing feminist beliefs, underscoring the impact of the gender discrimination she experienced throughout her life on her worldview. Pamela was aware of the backlash in the 1980s to second-wave feminism and sought not to rock the boat, portraying herself instead as a “quiet housewife” and inviting few women to her fundraising dinners. Purnell suggests that Pamela was a follower rather than a leader in feminist politics for much of her life, noting that Pamela’s views only changed once “more women entered politics and female donors gained more confidence” (303). This lightly critical depiction of Pamela’s views on female equality is exemplary of Purnell’s “nuanced,” rather than hagiographic, portrait of her central figure.



Unlock all 61 pages of this Study Guide
Get in-depth, chapter-by-chapter summaries and analysis from our literary experts.