Leadership: Six Studies in World Strategy

Gather initial thoughts and broad opinions about the book.

1. Which of the six leadership strategies Kissinger identifies (humility, will, equilibrium, transcendence, excellence, and conviction) resonated most strongly with you, and why?

2. Throughout the book, Kissinger blends scholarly analysis with firsthand observations from his diplomatic career. Does this approach remind you of other political memoirs that combine personal experience with historical analysis, such as Madeleine Albright’s Madam Secretary or Robert Gates’s Duty? How do their approaches differ?

3. Which leader’s portrayal in the book most significantly challenged your previous understanding of their historical legacy?

Encourage readers to connect the book’s themes and characters with their personal experiences.

1. Adenauer’s “strategy of humility” involved accepting Germany’s diminished status to rebuild trust with former enemies. When have you witnessed a situation where humility proved more effective than assertiveness?

2. What personal principles would you refuse to compromise if you faced moral dilemmas similar to those that faced the leaders the book describes?

3. The book suggests that national crises often produce exceptional leaders who have transformative visions. What leadership qualities have you discovered in yourself during difficult circumstances?

4. Margaret Thatcher’s unwavering stance during the Falklands War and miners’ strike exemplified her “strategy of conviction.” How do you determine when to hold firm versus when to seek compromise in consequential decisions?

5. Lee Kuan Yew created Singapore’s identity by blending Western and Eastern influences while maintaining strict social standards. What cultural or philosophical traditions have shaped your own leadership approach?

6. Anwar Sadat’s evolution from an anti-Zionist hardliner to a respectful peacemaker with Israel’s Golda Meir demonstrates profound personal growth. What significant perspective shifts have you experienced?

Examine the book’s relevance to societal issues, historical events, or cultural themes.

1. In the conclusion, Kissinger laments the decline of meritocracy and public service in modern Western society. What social changes might foster the development of leaders who have the capabilities he describes in the book?

2. The Cold War era provided the geopolitical backdrop for all six leadership stories that Kissinger explores. What comparable international challenges shape leadership decisions today?

3. Kissinger suggests that societies need both “statesmen” who manage circumstances and “prophets” who redefine possibilities. Which type does our current political environment seem to favor or reward?

Dive into the book’s structure, characters, themes, and symbolism.

1. Kissinger structures the book around the framework of distinct leadership strategies. Does this approach effectively capture the essence of each leader’s historical contribution?

2. Consider the dichotomy between “statesmen” and “prophets” that Kissinger establishes in the Introduction. Which of the six leaders most clearly exemplifies each archetype?

3. What patterns emerge in Kissinger’s portrayal of the relationship between individual character and historical circumstance across the six case studies?

4. In the Conclusion, Kissinger argues that leadership has evolved from aristocratic to meritocratic models. What specific evidence throughout the book supports this historical interpretation?

5. Kissinger’s portrayal of Nixon differs significantly from many popular historical accounts. What factors might explain Kissinger’s more sympathetic treatment?

6. In what ways does Kissinger’s selection of these particular six leaders rather than others reveal his own values and definition of effective leadership?

Encourage imaginative and creative connections to the book.

1. If you could add a seventh contemporary leader to Kissinger’s analysis, who would you select, and what “strategy” title would you assign to their chapter?

2. Imagine hosting a dinner conversation with any three of the six leaders profiled. What single question would challenge all three and generate meaningful dialogue among them?

3. Each leader in the book crafted a compelling national narrative during a time of crisis. What elements would you emphasize if creating a similar narrative for your country today?

Need more inspiration for your next meeting? Browse all of our Book Club Resources.