53 pages • 1-hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summaries & Analyses
Plot Summary
Background
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Key Figures
Themes
Index of Terms
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Reading Tools
In this chapter, Isaacson explores Leonardo’s investigations into geology, hydrodynamics, and the interconnectedness of natural systems. Using the analogy of the human body (microcosm) and the earth (macrocosm), Leonardo initially believed that veins, blood, and breath had direct counterparts in rivers, oceans, and tides. This concept informed his Codex Leicester, a notebook containing his observations and theories about geology, water, and astronomy. He studied erosion, water flow, fossils, and mountain springs, conducting both physical and thought experiments. Ultimately, Leonardo revised his original analogy, concluding that mountain springs result from rainfall and evaporation rather than subterranean circulation. His discoveries about erosion, sedimentary layers, and fossils challenged biblical flood narratives and prefigured modern geology. He also accurately described atmospheric optics, such as why the sky is blue. The chapter underscores Leonardo’s evolving scientific rigor, observational brilliance, and capacity to challenge even his own cherished ideas.
In 1512, with Milan politically unstable, Leonardo relocated to the Villa Melzi, where he lived with his pupil Francesco Melzi and continued anatomical and geological studies. He drew architectural plans, dissected animals, and revised his Codex Leicester, but did not compile his studies into treatises. In 1513, he moved to Rome under the patronage of Pope Leo X and Giuliano de’ Medici. Housed in the Vatican’s Villa Belvedere, Leonardo investigated mirror-making, drained marshes, and performed dissections until banned, likely due to rival interference. Though surrounded by artists like Raphael and Michelangelo, he painted little. Several probable portraits from this period depict him as a venerable sage. Conflicts with assistants and increasing isolation led to frustration. As Giuliano’s influence waned, Leonardo sought new patronage. In 1515, he joined the papal entourage to Florence and Bologna, where King Francis I of France began courting him as a court artist and thinker.
In the final decade of his life, Leonardo produced a small set of spiritually resonant works centered on pointing figures, including Saint John the Baptist, a now-lost Angel of the Annunciation, and a variant painting later altered to depict Bacchus. These figures—often androgynous and sensual—gaze directly at the viewer, their gestures implying divine revelation or personal invitation. Leonardo blurred the line between the spiritual and the physical, using chiaroscuro and sfumato to infuse his subjects with mystery. Some critics found these works unorthodox or erotic, but they reveal Leonardo’s deeper fascination with human duality. His studio also produced provocative sketches, such as the Angel Incarnate, likely by Salai, which explored gender ambiguity and spiritual symbolism. The recurring motif of the pointing figure culminated in Leonardo’s poetic Pointing Lady, a final meditation on guidance, mystery, and the unknowable truths that lie beyond science or reason.
Leonardo began painting the Mona Lisa around 1503 as a portrait of Lisa del Giocondo, the wife of a Florentine silk merchant. Though commissioned, he never delivered the painting, instead keeping it with him for the rest of his life and perfecting it over many years. The work became a deeply personal synthesis of Leonardo’s interests in anatomy, optics, geology, psychology, and the patterns of nature. Layer upon translucent layer, the painting evokes emotion and mystery, most famously through Lisa’s enigmatic smile and lifelike presence. Leonardo’s study of light, muscle movement, and atmospheric effects informs every detail, from the sfumato modeling of her face to the way the landscape merges symbolically with her form. More than a portrait, the Mona Lisa is a philosophical statement—an iconic expression of Leonardo’s belief in the unity of the human body, spirit, and the cosmos.
In 1516, Leonardo accepted an invitation from King Francis I of France to join his court, marking the final chapter of his life. He relocated to the Château du Clos Lucé near Amboise, where he enjoyed a generous stipend, freedom from commissions, and the admiration of a young, intellectually curious monarch. Though his right hand had become paralyzed—possibly from a stroke—Leonardo continued to teach, sketch, and work on his notebooks. He brought with him the Mona Lisa, Saint John the Baptist, and The Virgin and Child with Saint Anne, and designed elaborate court pageants and a visionary plan for a utopian city at Romorantin. His final years also produced the haunting deluge drawings. Leonardo died in 1519 at age 67. Though surrounded by myth, his death, like his art, leaves room for mystery, awe, and a profound sense of unfinished genius.
In the concluding chapter, Isaacson argues that Leonardo was indeed a genius, not because of divine inspiration or superhuman traits, but because of his relentless curiosity, creativity, and breadth of interest. Leonardo was a polymath who embraced both science and art, fantasy and observation, leaving behind masterpieces and unfinished projects alike. Isaacson emphasizes that Leonardo’s genius was rooted in habits and attitudes anyone can emulate: careful observation, playful curiosity, interdisciplinary thinking, and a commitment to learning for its own sake. The chapter concludes with a series of practical lessons from Leonardo’s life—ranging from the value of making lists and taking notes to indulging in fantasy and refusing to fear failure. While Leonardo’s talents may be rare, his approach to life offers an inspiring model for creative living and thinking across all domains.
This short coda to the biography reflects on Leonardo’s endless curiosity, spotlighting a specific and peculiar example: his desire to “describe the tongue of the woodpecker” (691), a phrase found in one of his notebooks. Isaacson offers a factual account of the woodpecker’s remarkable tongue anatomy—its length, its wraparound skull path, and its function in cushioning the brain. The detail itself serves no practical purpose for most people, just as it likely had no immediate use for Leonardo. Yet its inclusion epitomizes Leonardo’s approach to learning: driven not by utility but by wonder. The chapter closes with an implicit invitation for readers to embrace curiosity in their own lives, no matter how seemingly odd or unproductive the question may be.
Isaacson concludes the biography not with a crescendo of triumph, but with a quiet and deliberate meditation on process, humility, and the unknowable nature of genius. The tone softens in these chapters, shifting from admiration to intimacy as Leonardo’s final years are presented less as a legacy of finished masterpieces and more as a mosaic of persistent questions, delayed ambitions, and sustained wonder. The emotional arc of the biography closes with subtle echoes of its opening: The same child who once gazed into a cave with “fear and desire” (40) now leaves behind a note to “Describe the tongue of the woodpecker” (691). The woodpecker returns not just as a symbol of curiosity, but as a structural device that bookends the narrative—transforming an odd observation into a profound thesis about learning for its own sake.
As the chapters progress, Isaacson reinforces Leonardo’s fusion of disciplines through increasingly poetic and metaphorical language. Nowhere is this more evident than in Leonardo’s comparison between the earth and the human body: “The body of the earth, like the bodies of animals, is interwoven with ramifications of veins” (563). This line captures Leonardo’s enduring belief that art and science are not simply complementary but unified—each a method of mapping reality’s invisible connections. His metaphor of geological veins parallels his anatomical sketches, exemplifying The Integration of Art and Science as a Path to Truth. In his final years, even as his hand weakened, his mind remained devoted to discovering harmony in the world’s underlying forms. Isaacson’s use of lyrical quotations and layered imagery here blurs the line between scientific precision and spiritual insight, illuminating how Leonardo’s intellectual pursuits became a worldview as much as a method.
Yet Isaacson is equally attuned to the anxieties and contradictions that defined Leonardo’s creative life. His portrait of Leonardo in Rome presents a figure both revered and misunderstood, suspended between patronage and paralysis. When Pope Leo X reportedly said, “Alas, this man will never get anything done, for he is thinking about the end before he begins” (606), the remark functions as both criticism and eulogy. Isaacson uses this line to encapsulate The Tension Between Vision and Completion, a theme threaded throughout the biography. Leonardo’s foresight often made him appear inattentive to execution, but Isaacson reframes this not as failure, but as a consequence of boundless scope. The biography resists conventional narratives of productivity or deliverables, suggesting instead that Leonardo’s greatness lies in how he saw and what he pursued, not in what he finished.
That same tension surfaces again in Leonardo’s notebook plea: “Tell me. Tell me. Tell me if ever I did a thing” (682). The repetition and ellipses suggest a blend of doubt, humility, and existential vulnerability. In this moment, Isaacson strips away myth to reveal a man asking the same question many creators confront—whether the work was enough, whether it mattered. This intimate glimpse, placed near the book’s conclusion, reframes genius as self-questioning rather than self-satisfaction. It also reinforces a final thematic point: that Curiosity as a Discipline and a Way of Life was not merely Leonardo’s method but his compass. Isaacson’s choice to highlight small gestures—a soup cooling, a calculation left unfinished—grounds the biography in the everyday, making Leonardo’s curiosity feel both transcendent and accessible.
By ending with quiet moments rather than grand pronouncements, Isaacson avoids turning Leonardo into a monument. Instead, he offers a portrait of restlessness, complexity, and humility. The final image is not of Leonardo’s most famous painting or invention, but of a man setting down his pen because the soup is getting cold. It is an ordinary exit from an extraordinary life—and in Isaacson’s hands, a final affirmation that the pursuit of wonder, not its resolution, is what endures.



Unlock all 53 pages of this Study Guide
Get in-depth, chapter-by-chapter summaries and analysis from our literary experts.