44 pages • 1-hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summary
Background
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Key Figures
Themes
Symbols & Motifs
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
One of the main themes of Letters to My Palestinian Neighbor is the importance of listening to one another’s stories. The book is presented as an Israeli explanation of the Jewish story, and Halevi makes no attempt to tell the Palestinian side—he reserves that right for them. While he does explain his frustration with frequent Palestinian misunderstandings of the Jewish story and his desire for Palestinian leaders to operate differently, toward both Israelis and their own people, Halevi leaves the job of explaining the Palestinian side to his future interlocutors, writing, “We need to respect each other’s right to tell our own stories. That’s why I am writing to you, neighbor: to tell you my story, not yours. If you choose to write in response, as I hope you will, you’ll tell me your understanding of your history” (70). He believes that only through an open and understanding dialogue can the two groups come to a mutual understanding.
Halevi’s use of the theme of stories goes beyond the mere necessity of hearing one another’s narratives, though. He sees stories as having the power to shape whole cultures, to give them their sense of coherence, belonging, and power: “My definition for the Jews is this: We are a story we tell ourselves about who we think we are” (76). He believes that the Jewish people’s story is itself a form of their identity. In order to understand the Jewish presence in Israel, then, it would not be sufficient to focus on a singular aspect of the story of Jewish Peoplehood—for instance, regarding the efforts of European Jews in the Zionist movement as a representation of all Jewish people, or even the state of Israel. To understand Jewish claims to the land includes hearing the full, contextualized story of their people. Though most Jews historically existed apart from their ancestral homeland, Halevi would argue that their self-explanatory narrative, expressed daily in their traditions and prayers, maintained the central union of their peoplehood with the geographical territory of Israel. In that sense, the story they told themselves about Israel became a critical part of their identity that was left unresolved until the Jewish resettlements of the late 19th century began.
Halevi believes that Palestinians face the temptation of writing off crucial parts of the Jewish story—such as their ancient residence in the land and the veracity of the Holocaust—and choosing to focus only on the story of how Jews displaced them from their homes. Seeing the other’s story in this way will only prolong the conflict, and Halevi believes the same obligation rests on the Jewish side to hear the Palestinian story in full—not just the adversarial narrative of terrorism and hate—to begin understanding one another.
Halevi ascribes much of the failure of international attempts to achieve peace in Israel/Palestine with a widespread dismissal of the religious factors involved in the conflict. It has too often been treated as a political affair, while Halevi believes it is more significantly a religious conflict. While not all Israelis or Palestinians are religious believers, many are, and it is impossible to disentangle each groups’ claims on the land from the religious positions that have shaped those claims. This is seen most pointedly in the conflict over the use of the Temple Mount/Al-Aqsa in Jerusalem, which is one of the holiest sites of both Judaism and Islam, and which Halevi refers to as “[the] spiritual and emotional center point of our conflict” (139).
Halevi is clear that he is not simply suggesting a vague idea of interfaith dialogue; it is a pursuit he has long made central to his life and work. Letters to My Palestinian Neighbor is the latest incarnation of a longstanding attempt to build bridges from his own Jewish experience to the devotional life of Palestinian Islam, as he writes to his theoretical neighbor, “My journey into your faith was an attempt to learn a religious language for peace” (7). In previous stages, that attempt included pilgrimages to Muslim areas and relationships with sheikhs and imams. Due to the changes in the Israeli/Palestinian context in the aftermath of the Second Intifada, however, Halevi was no longer able to undertake such a direct and in-person approach, so he turned to writing. “I address you,” he writes, “[as] one person of faith to another” (7). Throughout the book, he expresses his appreciation for Muslim ideas, values, and devotional practices and seeks to explain the richness of Jewish devotional life to his readers. His hope is that an appreciation for the beauty and depth of both religious traditions can lead to an acceptance of one another based on shared values of dignity, sacredness, and peace.
One of Halevi’s goals throughout the book is to dispel common notions about Jews as being either a religion or a race (or associated concepts like ethnicity), and to set it in terms of family instead. While there is naturally some truth to the conceptions of Jews as a religion or a race, he writes that “The form that Jewish family takes is peoplehood” (52), as other identifiers are too narrow to encompass the reality of the global Jewish community have been taken as an excuse at times for disallowing Jewish claims to their own identity and their right to live in their homeland. When considered a religion, for instance, some other groups have accused Jews of not having any national or ethnic standing from which to make territorial claims. Meanwhile, when considered a race or an ethnicity, Jews have fallen under the racial attacks that have characterized anti-Semitism through the ages.
Further, both categories are insufficient to express the range of Jewish identity. One cannot regard the Jewish people as a singular religion when they include everything from secular atheists to the ultra-Orthodox. Similarly, to consider Jews a race or ethnicity disregards the broad cultural diversity they have acquired in the diaspora, now bearing ethnic identities attached to the USA, Russia, Morocco, Ethiopia, Yemen, Iraq, and many other areas. In addition, Halevi notes, one may become a Jew by conversion to its cultural identity, which is not characteristic of a racial or ethnic profile. The best way to understand Jewish group identity, then, is as a people—more specifically, as the outgrowth of a single global family, which began with Abraham four thousand years ago and which now extends around the world. That family is historically rooted in a single land, as all families are, and for the Jewish people it is the land of Israel. Halevi reasserts that “[The conflict] is about our right to be here, in any borders. Our right to be considered a people. An indigenous people” (14). Jews, while having overlapping ethnic and religious aspects in their identity, are fundamentally defined as a people shaped by the story of their family legacy, which is inextricably tied to the physical territory of Israel.
A final major theme of the book is that of justice and sacrifice, particularly in regard to the plight to achieve lasting compromises and pave the way to peace. Halevi notes that both sides in the conflict naturally tend to focus on the claims of justice pertaining to their own positions and the other side’s perceived embrace of injustice. Israelis, for instance, will focus on their historical argument for having a claim on the land, being an indigenous people who were at various times invited to resettle it by the international community in the first half of the 20th century, and who worked to redevelop it into a thriving modern nation-state. Palestinians, meanwhile, point to the justice of their own claim, many having descended from families with uninterrupted ownership of the land for centuries. Both sides likewise point to the injustices of the other side—the brutality of terrorism on one side and the violent imposition of occupation and settler communities on the other.
Halevi encourages the affirmation of both claims and notes that most Israelis now choose to view the conflict “as a tragedy being played out between two legitimate national movements” (113). He thus depicts the conflict as the collision of two true stories. In order to uphold the truth and justice of both sides, however, it is necessary that both sides learn to sacrifice. For example, while Halevi expresses support for the West Bank’s city of Hebron, where the Israeli settler movement is building communities, he admits that the Palestinians have legitimate historical claims to coastal areas like Jaffa and Haifa, which were centers of Palestinian life and culture for centuries. In order for the two communities to live peacefully as neighbors with these overlapping sets of legitimate claims, it will be necessary for each side to give up something that it could justify as its own, essentially trading Hebron for Haifa, though it is a painful concession for both sides. There is a mutuality to justice as Halevi perceives it; the most enduring form of justice is not that which creates winners and losers, but which creates communities of mutual recognition and willing self-sacrifice.



Unlock every key theme and why it matters
Get in-depth breakdowns of the book’s main ideas and how they connect and evolve.