63 pages 2-hour read

Midwives

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 1997

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Part 3, Chapters 18-22Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Content Warning: This section of the guide includes discussion of death, graphic violence, child death, and illness.

Part 3, Chapter 18 Summary

Connie’s mother and Stephen flirt with each other constantly that summer. Afraid of what may happen between the two if they are left alone, Connie makes a point of being home whenever Stephen comes over. One afternoon, days before the trial begins, Connie watches Sibyl walk Stephen out. Connie can tell that the grown-ups have headed to the garden instead of Stephen’s car. After a while, she overhears Sibyl apologizing to Stephen for sending him the wrong signals. Connie concludes that Stephen may have tried to kiss Sibyl and that she gently let him down.


Like Bill Tanner, Anne Austin appears as a monster in Connie’s 14-year-old perception, someone bent on destroying their family. In reality, as Connie will later realize, she is just a 22-year-old midwife’s apprentice. Anne is the first of the state’s final trio of important witnesses, who Tanner believes will cement his case. Stephen has explained to Connie how strategically Tanner planned the order in which the last three witnesses are to appear. Anne, the eyewitness, will provide emotional heft. The coroner, Dr. Tierney, will follow her, cementing her testimony with expertise. Asa, the father and preacher, will be last, his persuasive oratory style meant to sway the jurors.


While Tanner’s questioning of Anne aims to show the jurors how careless and arbitrary Sibyl was with Charlotte, Stephen’s cross-examination tries to undermine Anne’s credibility. He establishes that Anne, who lacks any medical training and has assisted in only nine childbirths, is unqualified to determine that the blood spurting from Charlotte was “alive.” Stephen also asks Anne if she saw Charlotte move or cry out in pain when Sibyl made an incision in her abdomen. Anne admits that she did not. Further, Stephen wonders aloud why Anne did not stop Sibyl if she was so convinced that Sibyl was hurting Charlotte. A weeping Anne replies that she lacked the confidence to stop Sibyl but told B. P. and Asa her suspicions as soon as she found her courage.


Dr. Tierney’s testimony is even more potentially damaging for Sibyl than that of the expert obstetrician. He tells Tanner that he found no softening of brain tissue in Charlotte to indicate an aneurysm, implying Sibyl’s assumption about Charlotte’s cause of death was erroneous. What Charlotte suffered was vagal syncope. Ironically, it was Sibyl’s CPR that revived Charlotte. Because he found over 750 ml of blood in Charlotte’s peritoneal cavity, in Tierney’s opinion, Charlotte was alive when Sibyl began operating on her. The cause of Sibyl’s death was hemorrhagic shock from the blood loss incurred during the C-section.

Part 3, Chapter 19 Summary

Stephen’s strategy in cross-examining Tierney is simply to lay the ground for testimony from his own forensic pathologists. He asks Tierney to confirm if 750 ml of blood is usually considered to indicate irrefutable hemorrhagic shock. Tierney admits that usually fatal cases of hemorrhage from C-sections involve at least 1,000 ml of blood. However, Tanner steps in to mention that huge amounts of blood were found outside the abdominal cavity, indicating that Charlotte bled a lot more than 750 ml.


On Monday morning, Asa takes the witness stand. Connie notes with shock how much the warm, affable man has aged since she last saw him, just months ago. Asa notes that he believed Sibyl when she told him that Charlotte had died but that when Sibyl asked him to get a knife, he didn’t understand her at first. Even after Sibyl replied that she was going to use the knife to save the baby, Asa’s mind could not comprehend the link between the rescue and cutting open his wife’s abdomen. In response to Tanner’s questions, Asa confirms that Sibyl did not seek his explicit permission before operating on Charlotte, nor did she check Charlotte’s pulse or the baby’s heartbeat before the operation. During the operation, he walked over to the window. However, he saw blood spurting from his wife as Sibyl made the incision.


Stephen’s careful cross-examination tries to show that Asa could not have possibly determined whether Charlotte was spurting blood. Nevertheless, Connie believes that Asa is too credible a witness to be undermined. She can see from the expressions on the faces of Charlotte’s family that they believe they are going to win.

Part 3, Chapter 20 Summary

When Stephen’s defense begins, the courtroom is packed with midwives and Sibyl’s clients, some of them nursing babies. Judge Dorset suggests that the mothers leave when the babies need to be nursed, prompting Stephen to note that this attitude may suggest to the jury an unfavorable view of midwives, women, and nursing. Judge Dorset thinks that the jury will hardly be swayed by the action.


Stephen’s defense consists of experts who present a different version of the testimony offered by the state’s witnesses. His expert on weather, for instance, notes that the roads were truly impassible the night Charlotte died. B. P., Sibyl’s back-up physician, provides a credible alternative to the state’s version of Charlotte’s death, noting that if Sibyl considered Charlotte to be beyond help, she was surely right. B. P. has worked with Sibyl for decades and knows her to be an expert in labor and delivery.


Stephen has scheduled Sibyl to testify toward the end of his defense. Connie notes that her mother makes a believable, earnest-looking witness in her green kilt. To Connie, her mother looks like a brave nurse or Joan of Arc. The first couple of hours of Sibyl’s testimony are packed with her righteous indignation and wit, Sibyl confirming that she did check Charlotte’s pulse and the baby’s heartbeat before the C-section. The reason Asa and Anne did not see her was that they had gone to the kitchen to get a knife. Sibyl did not explicitly ask for Asa’s permission because she was racing against time to save the baby. The alternative would have been to have two deaths on their hands.


However, as the testimony drags on, Sibyl makes an error from the defense’s point of view. She mentions to Tanner that she can confirm that she turned on the light by Charlotte’s bed because she noted this in her personal journal. A silence falls on the courtroom since it has never been revealed that Sibyl kept diaries. Stephen knows of the diaries and has forbidden Sibyl from writing in them any longer or mentioning them to the jury, as the diaries contain Sibyl’s doubts about Charlotte being alive when she operated on her. Connie, too, has read these entries.


Tanner asks for a recess with the judge, requesting that the journals be admitted as fresh evidence. State and defense lawyers argue with Judge Dorset, and it is finally decided that the judge himself will examine the journals from March 1981 onward and decide if they contain incriminating material. Patty Dunlevy, the PI assisting Stephen, is dispatched to get the journals from the Danforth home. Connie insists on coming along, as she knows where the diaries are kept.


Patty keeps the car running as Connie rushes indoors to get the binder. Since Connie has already read the incriminating entries, she carefully removes them from the binder, folding the papers and hiding them in her clothes. The judge studies the journal and deems that it contains nothing suspicious. As an adult, Connie postulates that the judge, an intelligent man, must have observed the look of surprise that passed across the faces of Sibyl and Stephen on receiving the news, yet, inexplicably, he chose to let it go.

Part 3, Chapter 21 Summary

Since Tanner is furious that the state was not allowed to read Sibyl’s journals, his resumed cross-examination of Sibyl is particularly vicious. However, having recovered her confidence after the journals were deemed innocuous, Sibyl parries Tanner’s questions sharply. Connie notes that Tanner fails to ask Sibyl the one question that would trip her up, which is whether there was absolutely no doubt in her mind that Charlotte died before the cesarean. Instead, Tanner frames the question as Sibyl having done everything to determine that Charlotte was dead before the operation.


After the day’s session, Connie carries the journals back to Sibyl’s study. She removes the folded papers from the waistband of her skirt and replaces them in the binder, hoping that Sibyl won’t notice the line where they were folded over. The next day, other doctors and forensic scientists on the defense’s panel give testimonies supporting Sibyl. One of the coroners argues that in all his decades of examining women who died of C-section hemorrhages, none had less than 1,100 ml of blood in the peritoneal cavity, a full pint more than the 750 ml found by Tierney. The closing arguments are presented on Friday. As the jury goes off to form a verdict, Stephen asks the Danforths not to believe the many myths around the process. Connie does believe the myths, though, which is why the aloof faces of the jurors upon their return make her start crying.


However, in the end, Stephen is proved right. The jury finds Sibyl not guilty on the charge of involuntary manslaughter and guilty only on charges of practicing medicine illegally. Sibyl is let off with a $200 fine. Rand says a loud thank-you in relief while the midwives sob in joy. Charlotte’s family, however, appears devastated by the verdict.


Sibyl is free to practice midwifery again. However, as it turns out, she has lost confidence and joy in catching babies. She gives up her profession a few months after the trial. Connie goes on to enroll in medical school seven years later for complex reasons, including “atonement.” Two years before Connie writes this book, Sibyl develops terminal lung cancer. Connie tends to her mother in her last days.


Connie still remembers the time Sibyl called her over after the trial to tell her that she had discovered Connie’s ruse with the binders. She suggested that Connie come clean about her actions and ask for a retrial. However, Connie did no such thing, and Sibyl ended up not telling Rand either. The event became a secret between mother and daughter, changing their relationship irrevocably. When Sibyl was dying, she told Connie that the notebooks were hers to do with as she pleased.


Tom and Connie parted ways after high school, though they still remain friends. Rand still lives in Reddington. Connie, who has joined a practice in central Vermont, meets her father for lunch at least once a week. Connie met Asa once, after she had grown up. Asa had remarried by then and relocated to Alabama. Veil was a strapping teenager, the spitting image of Charlotte, but for his height. Asa hugged Connie and wished her peace.

Part 3, Chapter 22 Summary

The quoted portion of Sibyl’s entry from March 15, 1981, notes how much her hands were shaking when she approached Charlotte with the knife. In shock, even her teeth made a loud chattering noise. She willed herself to be still and recalled the C-sections she had observed. Mimicking the actions of the doctors, she traced a line with her fingernail from Charlotte’s navel to her pubic bone and carefully pushed in the tip of the knife. No one except Sibyl saw the corresponding flinch of Charlotte’s body. At the time, Sibyl interpreted it as a post-mortem reflex. But today, a day later, she wonders if she was wrong. Whenever she thinks of the flinch, she wonders if Charlotte was indeed alive.

Part 3, Chapters 18-22 Analysis

The climactic final section returns to questions of subjectivity, truth, and perception. Connie’s narration explores the nature of perception when she admits that when she was a child, figures like Anne Austin and Bill Tanner seemed like monsters to her. Ann, who previously struck Connie as timid, was inflated in Connie’s imagination to “an arrogant traitor of almost theatric proportions […] bent upon the destruction of my family” (306). However, in hindsight, Connie doubts that Anne initially hated Sibyl or wanted to destroy her family. When Anne called B. P. and Asa to express her doubts about Sibyl, she could not have predicted that the chain of events would lead to Sibyl being tried in a courtroom. However, as the summer progressed and charges were brought against Sibyl, Anne must have started to believe the state’s narrative. By the time she testified in court, Anne would have started to view Sibyl as a rogue midwife who was a threat to her clients. Through unpacking a series of perceptions—her own view of Ann, Ann’s changing opinions of Sibyl—Connie shows how subjectivity defines truth at specific moments in time, including how the stories people tell shift to justify their own actions.


The novel also explores the elusiveness of the truth through the lens of semantics. Lawyers, doctors, midwives, and forensic examiners quibble over medical and legal details to present their version of the truth. For instance, the coroner, Dr. Tierney, and the forensic experts presented by the defense argue about the amount of blood found in Charlotte’s abdominal cavity. The nitpicking over the arc of blood seems almost farcical given the presence of Charlotte’s family in court. In presenting the arguments in the court as theater that fails to account for the emotional truth of events, the narrative emphasizes the cynicism of the legal system.


In the loaded atmosphere of the courthouse, seemingly mundane speech takes on significance. Sibyl notes in her journal entry that the state refers to her as Mrs. Danforth or the midwife to dehumanize her, while the defense does the same thing for Charlotte, referring to her as Mrs. Bedford or “the wife.” Thus, the courthouse proceedings are an exercise in the manipulation of perception, illustrating the Legal System’s Power to Determine the Truth. The theme reaches its apex with the jury’s verdict. While Sibyl’s journal entries suggest that she may indeed be guilty of involuntary manslaughter, Stephen (aided by Connie) manages to create the impression of Sybil’s innocence. This impression—rather than the complex reality—is then determined to be true by the court.


That the trial takes place against the backdrop of The Debate Between Alternative and Institutionalized Medicine makes the truth even more elusive by introducing additional agendas. Bill Tanner sees Sibyl’s verdict as a victory because the jury decides that Sybil is guilty of practicing medicine without a license. For Tanner, this implies a verdict on the practice of midwifery itself, supporting his negative view of the profession. Tanner’s response indicates that the real battle for him was about demonizing midwifery rather than securing justice.


Sibyl’s account of the night of Charlotte’s death shows the complexity of medical decision-making in crisis. Sibyl emphasizes that during a crisis, there is often little time to behave in a perfect manner. Thus, when she concluded that she must save the baby, she forgot everything else, including to ask Asa for explicit permission to operate on his wife. Additionally, Sibyl assumed Asa would want to save at least the child now that the mother was gone. As the novel shows, there is not always a clear-cut manual about how to behave in emergency situations; management sometimes boils down to the judgment of the person in charge. At the same time, the question remains whether the same situation could be handled better in a hospital setting, with access to diagnostic equipment to determine Charlotte’s state more precisely.


The most significant development in the book’s conclusion is the reveal about Sibyl’s journal entries from March 15. This late twist casts all elements of the novel, including Sibyl’s character and Connie’s testimony, in a new light. While Sibyl does not technically lie to the jury—she did check Charlotte for a pulse before operating on her, and she did believe that Charlotte was dead—Sibyl never reveals that Charlotte flinched when she made the incision. Though this is not conclusive proof that Charlotte was alive, it complicates the question of Sibyl’s judgment in the moment, while withholding the evidence is ethically ambiguous at best. Connie’s defense of her mother, and even the reason for her writing her account, also gain new meaning in light of this information. The fact that Connie removed the incriminating entries from the binder partially explains why she chose to become an obstetrician, which she describes as “atonement.”

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Unlock all 63 pages of this Study Guide

Get in-depth, chapter-by-chapter summaries and analysis from our literary experts.

  • Grasp challenging concepts with clear, comprehensive explanations
  • Revisit key plot points and ideas without rereading the book
  • Share impressive insights in classes and book clubs