52 pages • 1-hour read
Paul AusterA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Content Warning: This section of the guide includes discussion of death, self-harm, illness, ableism, mental illness, and pregnancy termination.
Marco Stanley Fogg is both the protagonist and the retrospective narrator of the novel. The narrator-Fogg is the older version of this character, and he is looking back on the events of the novel and framing them as the memories of the start of his life. Though the novel leaves the state of his life as an older man ambiguous, Fogg’s narrative arc leans toward the suggestion that the novel’s events helped him to solidify his perspective on life and identity, and in defining both of these things for himself, he relies upon invention and chance to create personal meaning.
Fogg is commonly referred to by his nickname, “M.S.,” to evoke the idea that his life is a story-in-progress. In the earliest parts of the novel, Fogg is heavily influenced by the irrepressible optimism of his Uncle Victor, who raised him in the absence of Fogg’s father and following the death of Fogg’s mother, Emily. Fogg honors Victor’s influence by adopting his uncle’s overly optimistic worldview and by wearing Victor’s tweed suit every day in college in order to feel connected to him. The gradual degradation of the suit is representative of Fogg’s chief character flaw: He anchors his life so firmly to the invention of meaning that he loses sight of practical matters, like maintaining the suit. This fatal flaw paves the way for Fogg’s deliberate inaction in the face of his impending poverty, and this choice eventually leads to his eviction from his apartment and his time living unhoused in Central Park.
Fogg derives personal meaning from the mythology he invents around his upbringing. Because Emily never gave Fogg any clues about the identity of his father, he imagines his father as a mythical heroic figure. Since Emily also dies before Fogg gets to know her, his memory of her creates an unrealistic figure: a woman who had no flaws to speak of. He ties the memory of her to chicken pot pie, and at the end of the novel, he tries to revive this memory as a way of seeking comfort over the revelation of his father’s true identity. With his discovery that Solomon Barber is his father, he has a violent reaction because this revelation directly contradicts the mythical foundations of his personal identity. He grows bitter when faced with the realization that his father was the same person whom Effing called a “disaster” and that Emily was hiding Solomon’s identity because their brief relationship made her feel shame.
Though Fogg is a round protagonist, he ultimately reveals his static quality by the end of the novel when he abandons his life on the Atlantic Coast and treks to the Pacific Coast in a quest to reinvent himself. This reinvention is his attempt to preserve his fundamental character traits, like his optimism and his devotion to creating his own personal meaning from life’s randomness. In his mind, he can erase the impact of the final chapters’ events on his life simply by journeying westward and arbitrarily declaring that his life is only just beginning.
As one of the novel’s main supporting characters, Thomas Effing functions as a mentor for Fogg in the absence of Uncle Victor. By telling Fogg the story of his life and explaining how he changed his identity, Effing provides Fogg with the framework for the reinvention that he undergoes at the end of the novel.
Born Julian Barber, Effing is a consummate unreliable narrator. As the magazine editor tells Fogg after Effing’s death in Chapter 6, there is no concrete evidence that any of Effing’s story is true, including his assertion that he and Barber are the same person. Fogg even acknowledges this issue in Chapter 5 when he comments that Effing’s story feels too outlandish to be true, but even so, he accepts the man’s tale at face value because it resonates with his own experiences. This dynamic suggests that Fogg finds meaning in Effing’s story because its details evoke deep emotional truths that transcend the question of its historical reliability. In this context, the truth behind Effing’s claim that he is the father of Solomon Barber is also deeply ambiguous. Fogg only accepts this assertion as true because he chooses to accept Effing’s story. Similarly, Solomon accepts the claim because it resonates with his experience of losing his father at an early age. Like Fogg, Solomon is drawn to the emotional truth that Effing’s story invokes.
During the time that Fogg spends with him, Effing is depicted as an ill-tempered, wealthy man whose misbehavior comes from a place of mistrust and paranoia. Even when Fogg gains Effing’s trust, Effing doesn’t hesitate to accuse him of planning to steal from Effing’s wealth. He later comes to regret this outburst, underscoring the personal weakness that his irascible behavior is designed to hide. In fact, the more Fogg gets to know Effing, the more he understands the man’s vulnerability and sensitivity. Fogg learns, for instance, that Effing previously had another male companion, Pavel Shum. Fogg always speaks affectionately of Shum, which sets a precedent for Fogg to earn his way into his employer’s good graces over time. Fogg also uses the last days of his life to destroy the identity he has built for himself, redistributing the wealth he claimed to have stolen outlaws and making himself sick in order to accelerate his own death.
Fogg’s loyalty to Effing points to the deep influence that the older man has on him, which Effing validates when he shows his concern toward Fogg while on his deathbed. As he tells Fogg, “You need someone to look after you, to make sure you have food in your belly and a bit of cash in your pocket. Once I’m gone, you’ll be right back where you started” (216). In this sense, Effing functions as a surrogate for Fogg’s absent father, succeeding Victor in this role.
Solomon Barber is another major supporting character who functions as a foil for Fogg. In Chapter 6, the novel reveals that Solomon is Fogg’s father, though Fogg-as-protagonist does not find this out for himself until Chapter 7. The preemptive exposition of Solomon’s identity is necessary to establish his function in the narrative, inviting comparisons between Fogg and Solomon as Solomon’s backstory is revealed.
The most important aspect of Solomon’s backstory is the fact that he and Fogg grew up in similar circumstances. Like Fogg, Solomon was raised by relatives after his father disappeared and was presumed dead; his mother experienced a mental health crisis that eventually caused her to move to a psychiatric hospital in Switzerland. However, the divergence between Fogg and Solomon occurs in how they respond to their family circumstances. Whereas Fogg builds his identity around his family life, Solomon uses his intellect to confront the impact that his family life has had on his personal identity, and he ultimately distances himself from it. Kepler’s Blood, the novel that Solomon writes as a young man, allows him to vent his feelings about the absence of his father, conveying his paradoxical grief over the loss of his father and his anger over the possibility that his father could still be alive.
Solomon is characterized by his large size, though the novel makes a distinction between his size at birth and the obesity that he experiences for most of his life. It is revealed at one point that Solomon’s mother experienced her mental health crisis while in labor, believing that Solomon was trying to kill her with his size. This origin story cemented the conviction that Solomon’s mother rejected him because of his natural qualities. In response, Solomon embraced his large size, intensifying the severity of his obesity to transform his girth into a source of personal strength. In contrast to Effing, who reinvents himself by rejecting his material circumstances, Solomon radically accepts the realities of his life, and this approach offers Fogg an alternate way of living. Fogg comes to see Solomon as one of his closest friends, though he also admittedly views the man with pity after learning that Emily’s retreat from Ohio denied Solomon his right to parenthood.
Kitty Wu is Fogg’s romantic interest throughout the novel. Though she tries to separate Fogg from his solipsism, Fogg’s self-centered worldview ultimately causes their relationship to fall apart. Fogg and Kitty first meet by chance when Fogg is running out of money and seeks the help of his college friend, Zimmer. The sympathy that Kitty shows Fogg endears him to her, and her role in the narrative is cemented when she asks Fogg for a kiss at the end of their first meeting. Kitty’s concern for Fogg becomes a crucial lifeline, facilitating his rescue from Central Park at the end of Chapter 2, and Zimmer catalyzes their relationship by encouraging Fogg to pursue Kitty. He also awakens Fogg to the parallels in their respective upbringings, as they both grew up in nontraditional family settings. Hearing this, Fogg realizes that Kitty can understand him in ways most other people, including Zimmer, cannot. When Zimmer exits the narrative, Kitty becomes Fogg’s only real link to the world, aside from his engagements with Effing and Solomon.
Kitty is driven to pursue her vocation for dance, which she prizes just as highly as her relationship with Fogg. When Kitty becomes pregnant with Fogg’s child, she decides to terminate the pregnancy because she is unwilling to give up her career as a dancer and devote most of her time to raising a child. Fogg resists her decision because he sees fatherhood as a way to correct the emotional truth of his own upbringing. The relationship between Fogg and Kitty therefore collapses because Fogg fails to see that when he urges Kitty to have the baby, he is prioritizing his quest for personal meaning over her agency.



Unlock analysis of every major character
Get a detailed breakdown of each character’s role, motivations, and development.