61 pages • 2-hour read
Arundhati RoyA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Content Warning: This section contains discussions of child abuse, sexual violence, substance use disorders, and state-sponsored, Islamophobic violence.
Mary Roy is a complex figure who embodies deeply toxic traits while also emerging as an important educator and activist in her native Kerala. In public she is charismatic and driven, supportive of her students, and a champion of women’s rights. In private, she is an abusive, emotionally withholding mother who leaves her children with lifelong scars. Arundhati describes her as having provided “help and harm in equal measure” (24). Through her portrait of Mary, Arundhati examines the tension between public legacy and private identity.
Mary Roy’s public persona is built initially on her career as an educator and founder of one of Kerala’s most prestigious schools. Her academic standards are high and she prepares her students for important careers, but she also uses her educational platform for activism. Mary is deeply critical of patriarchy and of the sexism that underpins Indian culture. She hopes to teach her male students to be more respectful of women and her female students to want more out of life than marriage and motherhood. Of her students, Arundhati reflects: “She freed them of the burden of being what society thought men ought to be. She raised generations of sweet men and sent them out into the world. What she did for her girl students, the spirit she instilled in them, was nothing short of revolutionary” (34). Ultimately, Mary takes this activism one step further and successfully petitions the Indian courts to reverse their sexist inheritance laws. By the time of her death, she is seen as a champion of women’s rights and a transformative educator.
Nevertheless, in private she is a deeply troubled mother and an abusive figure in both of her children’s lives. Her temper, Arundhati notes, is “irrational and uncontrollable” (19). She berates Arundhati for all kinds of perceived faults and blames LKC for India’s sexism. Both children ultimately spend years refusing to speak to her, and each carries the burden of their childhood trauma well into adulthood. Arundhati has to navigate the difficulties of adolescence and early adulthood largely on her own, and her search for identity will be, at times, entirely focused on processing the impact of her abusive childhood. That Mary Roy was herself abused makes their family history even more complex: Their trauma, rooted as it is in Mary’s father’s abuse, is intergenerational and will become especially difficult to move past given Mary’s unwillingness to discuss her own abusive tendencies.
LKC is never truly able to forgive Mary, but Arundhati does. She finds that she can move past Mary’s abuse in part because she becomes more aware of the difficulties that Mary faced as a young, intellectual woman in a deeply patriarchal India. She admires her mother’s activism and realizes that her own entrance into the world of social justice happened in part because of her mother’s influence. Her mother’s public persona ultimately overshadows her private faults, and Arundhati forgives her because she realizes that her mother’s legacy is much more than her parenting.
While Arundhati Roy often reflects on her mother’s volatile parenting, the memoir is also a meditation on the way that creativity shaped her search for identity. Her writing career proceeds in fits and starts through a non-traditional and circuitous route. As she comes into her own as a writer and activist, she clarifies her identity and ultimately arrives at a place of genuine self-knowledge, revealing the links between creativity and identity development.
Arundhati’s interest in creativity begins in childhood but is stifled by her mother’s harsh criticism of her writing. Although Arundhati is drawn to writing and already grasps the transformative power of literature, Mary dismisses her early writing and discourages her from pursuing it. Arundhati thus does not see writing as a concrete career possibility until much later, when Pradip encourages her. The freedom to pursue writing seriously, then, also becomes a way for Arundhati to put emotional distance between herself and her mother. She has to break free from the version of her that her mother created and strike out on her own. Writing becomes a way for Arundhati to develop a distinct identity, one that is independent from her family and its fraught history.
Creativity and writing also help Arundhati to find the freedom to work entirely on her own. Her first writing jobs are collaborative work with Pradip, but after working on a series of films with him, she longs to find a more individual voice. She focuses on writing projects that are more personal. It is during these years that she writes The God of Small Things, the debut novel that will win the Booker Prize and catapult her to international stardom. The novel is deeply personal, and many of its characters are based on her own family members. She notes that she “wrote versions” of her mother in her books in order to think more objectively about her and work through her feelings. Creative writing becomes a way for Arundhati to make sense of and move on from the past. Here, too, her career is in lock-step with her personal identity development: As she grows as a writer, she also re-affirms herself as an independent individual and processes her grief.
Arundhati’s writing also helps her to clarify her positions on India’s fraught politics and center activism within her life. Through her essays, she criticizes the Indian government, the large-scale corporate interests that threaten working-class communities, Hindu nationalism, Islamophobia, and violence against women. She notes that after she began writing these essays she “soon began to be called a writer-activist” (233). Although she is initially uncomfortable with this label, she ultimately realizes that “writer-activist” is the identity category that she has adopted and that she should take pride in it.
Although Mother Mary Comes to Me focuses ostensibly on the author’s life, she also engages with India’s fraught history of sexism and gender-based violence. As she does in her novels, Arundhati Roy weaves the personal with the political. Part of her aim in this memoir is not only to better acquaint her readers with 20th-century Indian history, but also to explore the ways that patriarchy shaped her life and the lives of her family members. Such injustices drive both Arundhati and her mother in the battle against sexism and gender inequality.
Arundhati Roy is committed to an honest portrayal of the way that sexism and patriarchy create a culture in which violence against women is endemic and permitted. When she realizes that JC ultimately wants a traditional wife and leaves him, one of his friends urges her to give the relationship another chance. To convince her that JC is a suitable partner, he argues that women like her need “a good, tight slap every now and again. You want a man to act like a man” (99). Again and again in Mother Mary Comes to Me she observes incidents during which an Indian woman becomes the target of violence just because of her gender, and she even engages with that history of violence in her fiction. Even after she marries, she continues to pursue her career and even ultimately lives separately from her husband to preserve her independence.
Mary Roy, too, spends her lifetime fighting for equality in India. Herself the victim of childhood abuse, the disempowerment of traditional marriage, and India’s deeply unequal inheritance laws, Mary champions the rights of women. She fights for equality, self-determination, and rejects traditional norms that confine women within the roles of wife and mother. Mary models the values she espouses: She divorces her husband, founds a school, and spends her entire life dedicated to her career and her social justice work. She also instills in her students a keen awareness of the sexism that underpins Indian society and educates an entire generation of individuals whom she hopes will work to overthrow the patriarchy.
Social and gender justice ultimately become points of connection between mother and daughter, and in spite of Mary’s continued criticism and judgment, she and Arundhati ultimately bond over Arundhati’s writing and activism. She believes that she is carrying on her mother’s legacy and that because they have found a joint passion, they are united in fighting for a better society for Indian’s women.



Unlock every key theme and why it matters
Get in-depth breakdowns of the book’s main ideas and how they connect and evolve.