48 pages • 1-hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Content Warning: This section of the guide includes discussion of graphic violence, illness or death, sexual violence, child abuse, child sexual abuse, and child death.
Although Fraser narrates the stories of multiple serial killers in Murderland, the book’s primary focus is Ted Bundy (1946-1989), a Tacoma-based serial killer who was active while Fraser was growing up in the Seattle area. Between 1974 and 1978, Bundy killed dozens of women, and Murderland is one of many books attempting to explain or shed new light on his murders. Fraser addresses major theories, such as abandonment and sexual abuse, before suggesting that, like many serial killers in the 1970s and 1980s, he grew violent as a result of exposure to toxic chemicals. However, Fraser differentiates Bundy from the others by suggesting that he was uniquely influenced by violent stories of true crime in detective magazines. This theory supports Bundy’s own insistence that the urge to kill came from beyond him.
In introducing Bundy, Fraser points to two major theories about his childhood: that his violence was influenced by either his early abandonment issues or sexual abuse. In her description of Bundy’s teenage mother making the anguished decision to bow to societal pressure and place her newborn son for adoption, Fraser writes that she “[left] him, like a package at the train station, like lost luggage” (29). Bundy and his mother eventually reunited, but Fraser suggests that he lost her again when she remarried, and the former only child was “displaced by Bundy babies” (49). These passages recall the familiar theory that Bundy’s violence stemmed from his newborn abandonment, suggesting that his mother treated him as an object rather than offering him love. In the same passage, Fraser briefly mentions that, at a young age, Bundy was “found undressed in a tent with a Scoutmaster” (49), hinting at the popular theory that Bundy’s sexualized violence stemmed from his own sexual abuse.
Ultimately, Fraser concludes that Bundy was one of thousands of US citizens who became violent after exposure to toxic chemicals, noting that Bundy spent most of his childhood downwind of the Ruston smelter. However, she attributes his specifically sexualized violence to his affinity for detective magazines, pulp publications that offered lurid accounts of violent crimes. Fraser implies that such fiction influenced Bundy’s murder of Shelley Robertson, whose body was found in an abandoned mine shaft. Shortly before her disappearance, True Detective featured “a graphic article about Robert Garrow, a pedophile, rapist, and murderer” who killed a woman and “hid the body in an abandoned mine shaft” (231). Fraser grimly notes that “True Detective has always been one of his favorite magazines” (231). Elsewhere, Fraser explicitly connects Bundy’s violence to these magazines, claiming that his murder sprees were “reenacting the treasured detective magazine images” (138).
Fraser quotes Bundy at length throughout Murderland, and his confessions reveal that he, too, believed that his violence had an external source. Bundy claimed that he was afflicted by “‘an acute onset of a desire that resulted in the pattern of […] killing young girls’” (187), speculating that “‘it was some sort of genetic or even congenital condition whose time had come’” (187). Thus, Bundy explicitly compared his violent streak to a medical condition, suggesting paradoxically that it was both out of his control and innate, stemming from within his body. Later, he clarified that an external source triggered this “‘predisposition,’” claiming that “‘absent certain stresses and certain environmental conditions’” (187), his violent behavior would never have occurred. Although Fraser’s goal is not to exonerate Bundy for his crimes, her argument that environmental toxins and detective magazines were contributing factors aligns with his assertion that external factors triggered his violence.
Although Fraser’s unnamed father is not an active character in Murderland, his presence looms large throughout the book. He represents the constant threat of violence that was a backdrop for the sensationalized violence of serial killers in the 1970s and 1980s. Fraser was terrified of her father’s violent, controlling nature, which she attributes to his father’s strict faith as a Christian Scientist. Early in the book, Fraser writes that she and her siblings lived “in fear” of their father and that her mother often lied to him to protect them. When Fraser’s neighbor tried to blow up his home with his family inside, she thought it was “what dads do” (78). These passages suggest that fear of violence was a normal part of Fraser’s life, providing helpful context for her exploration of the violence in the 1970s.
The book suggests that Fraser’s fear of her father was well-founded. During her childhood, his violence was so regular that Fraser and her siblings came to believe that “our arms [were] for yanking, our heads for smacking with the handles of table knives” (81). This description reflects the habitual, casual nature of his violence. He often threatened to kill his children, warning them that he had “created us without meaning to [and could] destroy us just the same” (82). Fraser believes that he often tried to destroy his children, reflecting that he “appear[ed] to have embarked on a passive campaign to get rid of us through a series of near-death experiences” (84). This casual violence suggests that, like the women she describes, she was a target of a culture of violence in the 1970s. Her father was deeply controlling of all aspects of family life. She recalls how he hit her brother “with a board for eating maraschino cherries without permission” (72) and how her sister met “the same fate for taking crackers from the kitchen” (72). When Fraser was 11, her father “drain[ed] the oil out of [her] mother’s car so she [couldn’t] go anywhere” (106). These passages show that he was controlling and abusive.
Fraser explicitly attributes her father’s controlling, violent nature to his faith as a Christian Scientist. In Fraser’s first book, God’s Perfect Child: Living and Dying in the Christian Science Church, she details her serious criticisms of the church in which she was raised. In Murderland, she simplifies the church’s beliefs as “nothing is real” (82). She explains that Christian Scientists like her father “don’t go to doctors, don’t wear seat belts, and don’t believe in accidents” (82). Fraser suggests that this belief system empowered her father’s abusive behavior, arguing that “in a world in which nothing is real, he can do whatever he wants” (82). If Fraser’s father believes that “nothing is real […] not bodies, bones, brains, or eyes” (82), then the physical abuse he enacts on his children is not lasting. Even more threateningly, Fraser argues, the tenets of Christian Science led Fraser’s father to believe that it was possible to “murder people with your mind” (82). Fraser’s criticisms of the Christian Science Church appear throughout her work, and her father reifies that criticism in Murderland, hinting at the potential for abuse.
The American Smelting and Refining Corporation, known as ASARCO, is a mining, smelting, and refining company and a major villain in Murderland. Although the book names certain executives, Fraser largely refers to ASARCO’s executives as a collective, singular villain. Although the company is now a fraction of its former size, operating only two sites, ASARCO was once “a behemoth operating as a near monopoly, one of the most economically and politically powerful entities in the world, governing 90 percent of American lead production” (34). Fraser argues that ASARCO executives knowingly endangered the environment and the health of their workers and the surrounding communities in their pursuit of profits.
Fraser’s primary concern in Murderland is the influence of exposure to toxic chemicals on patterns of violence in the 1970s and 1980s. She explicitly attributes toxic pollution in the Pacific Northwest to industrial activity, especially by ASARCO. Although ASARCO officials repeatedly denied that their smelters affected the environment, Fraser’s research shows that they had full knowledge of the harm they were causing. In one letter, “an official at the Tacoma plant lament[ed] to a colleague about how homes continue[d] to be built on what the company call[ed] the ‘waste land’ of Skyline and the West End” (62), where they were knowingly dumping toxic chemicals. In another letter, an executive writes, “regretfully […] it may not be possible to continue pumping arsenic into the air ‘for a great many more years’” (62) due to new EPA regulations. Fraser demonstrates that company executives knew they were endangering the environment, which strengthens her criticisms of ASARCO.
In addition, Fraser shows that ASARCO executives knowingly harmed the health of their workers and of people in surrounding communities. She suggests that ASARCO executives were not worried when smelter workers first protested about their exposure to toxic chemicals because they had “numerous trusted friends in State and Federal health agencies” (97-98) who had anticipated these concerns and had already prepared medical papers arguing that the exposure was safe. In these papers, ASARCO-funded scientists “claim that whatever lead children may be picking up comes simply from playing in the dirt, not from breathing the air” (110). Fraser explicitly calls this type of claim “a bald-faced lie” (253) and accuses ASARCO executives of repeatedly covering up health threats. For Fraser, this kind of corporate misconduct is a violence comparable to the violence Ted Bundy enacted, and she compares Bundy to the corporation throughout the book. This comparison reflects Fraser’s belief that ASARCO’s pattern of lying about environmental and health dangers qualifies as murderous behavior.



Unlock analysis of every key figure
Get a detailed breakdown of each key figure’s role and motivations.