36 pages 1-hour read

New York Burning: Liberty, Slavery, and Conspiracy in Eighteenth-Century Manhattan

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 2005

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

The Effects of Mass Hysteria

New York Burning is perhaps best understood as a tale of mass hysteria, in which people project their own fears onto real life events and behave in a panicked, frenzied way. While Lepore does not dispute that unhappy slaves in 1741 might have set fire to homes, Lepore does suggest that fears of a widespread uprising—and in particular, Horsmanden’s belief that the fires stem from an international conspiracy—are overblown and detached from the reality of what occurred.


In Chapter 2, “Fire,” Lepore describes the speed at which panic can spread in a city like New York. 18th-century New York society is suffused with a mood of paranoia, with New Yorkers often suspecting that the city is full of “plotters lurking behind nearly every shadow” (51). This atmosphere of suspicion becomes combined with widespread anxieties surrounding New York’s slave population. New York newspapers frequently carry news of slave uprisings throughout the colonies, with the stories often suspiciously matching the genre conventions of popular fiction of rebellions. While some of these slave rebellions are true, more often than not, they are fabricated tales based upon rumors. Due to the number of these stories, New Yorkers are primed to suspect that slaves are always at the brink of revolt. As a result, the discovery that some slaves have been linked to the fires in 1741 sends New Yorkers into an uproar. Throughout the city, “New Yorkers began to cry, ‘The Negroes are rising!’” (50), and dozens of slaves are rounded up and thrown into jail.


The consequences of such hysteria is explored in Chapter 7 through the anonymous letter. Purporting to be sent by a Bostonian, the letter draws parallels between New York’s slave burnings and Massachusetts’s earlier Salem witch trials, in which hundreds of people are accused of partaking in witchcraft, and 19 individuals are executed. The letter writer argues that more often than not, fearful individuals can transform singular crimes into evidence of a massive conspiracy, leading to the arrest of innocent citizens. Further, confessions “obtain’d by foul means, by force or torment” (204) cannot be trusted, as an individual may falsely confess to try and avoid being burned at the stake. In the Salem witch trials, such mass hysteria leads to the innocent women being accused of witchcraft and burnt at the stake. While Lepore is unable to definitively say whether certain accused slaves were innocent, she does suggest that it is highly likely at least some of the slaves were unjustly convicted and sent to their deaths.

The Hypocrisy of Slavery

In New York Burning’s preface, Lepore describes one of the core paradoxes that her book will trace: the hypocritical relation in American history between slavery and liberty. For Lepore, slavery and liberty must be understood as closely related to one another in Colonial America, as “one kind of slavery made another kind of liberty possible in eighteenth-century New York” (xii). 1700s New York is a cosmopolitan center in the colonies, with numerous educated wealthy men gathering in New York’s many social clubs to discuss and debate ideas of political liberty. Often, men such as James Alexander would champion the freedom of speech and decry censorship as unjust slavery at the same time that they would actively partake in the slave trade. Nowhere is this hypocrisy more fully illustrated than Lepore’s description of an estate auction. In the same auction, educated New Yorkers bid on both human slaves and works of philosophy espousing the importance of man’s freedoms. As these educated New Yorkers believe that black people are less than human beings, they see no problem with owning a slave.


The hypocrisy of slavery is especially evident throughout Horsmanden’s trial, where slaves play a complicated role. Horsmanden’s case largely rests upon the testimony of slaves, who are some of the only witnesses who can speak as to who was involved in the plot. However, the slave’s status as property, and not human beings, complicates how so-called “Negro Evidence” (97) can be used in court. As slaves are not considered human nor Christian, the court does not believe that slaves can swear an oath to provide truthful testimony. The court ultimately makes exceptions to this prohibition of slave evidence and allows slaves to testify each other in cases of “conspiracy, arson, and murder” (98). However, slaves are still barred from providing testimony against whites, which prevents slaves from providing testimony against the white John Hughson. To solve this problem, Horsmanden uses a loophole: While slaves cannot provide testimony in a court of law, their “dying confessions […] [were] admissible” (109). Horsmanden obtains confessions from the slaves Quack and Cuffee shortly before their death. These confessions clearly name Hughson as one of the masterminds behind the plot, allowing Horsmanden to convict Hughson and sentence him to execution.

Blurring of History and Fiction

Throughout New York Burning, Lepore thematizes the ways in which fact and fiction are frequently blurred in Horsmanden’s Journal. As the Journal is one of the only historical accounts of the 1741 slave trials, Lepore is unable to independently verify whether the Journal’s version of the rebellion is factually true. Lepore argues that Horsmanden’s Journal behaves less like a historical account and more like “an early English novel” (122). As such, Lepore’s analysis of the Journal must carefully consider how Horsmanden’s own personal bias may have impacted his narrativization of the rebellion. Lepore argues that Horsmanden’s understanding of the 1741 fires tells us most about his own anxieties and fears: “In an anxious empire, [Horsmanden] found monstrous black creatures. In a rebellious province, he spotted political plotters” (122). Yet, despite the fact that Horsmanden’s bias deeply colors his book on the trials, Horsmanden “erased the evidence of his own role in the investigation whenever possible” (123). By refusing to acknowledge his part in the slave trials, Horsmanden’s Journal presents a highly individual view of events as the factual, objective truth.


Horsmanden’s ability to twist the facts to his liking is especially evident in the confession of the slave Jack. As Jack speaks in a thick dialect, Horsmanden is unable to understand Jack’s confession. Horsmanden brings in translators to explain Jack’s testimony, which Horsmanden then transcribes and summarizes in Horsmanden’s own words. As such, Horsmanden is able to take Jack’s words and use them for his own purposes, “fixing meaning” (115) to Jack’s confession.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Unlock every key theme and why it matters

Get in-depth breakdowns of the book’s main ideas and how they connect and evolve.

  • Explore how themes develop throughout the text
  • Connect themes to characters, events, and symbols
  • Support essays and discussions with thematic evidence