51 pages • 1-hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
This section opens with an account of a brutal murder that took place in April 1920 in Braintree, Massachusetts. A group of armed men robbed and killed two men transporting money. One of the culprits died on the scene, but others escaped in a getaway car. There was another similar crime in nearby Bridgewater. Though there was a lack of evidence about the identities of the escapees, “Chief Michael E. Stewart of the Bridgewater Police Department decided, for reasons unattached to evidence, that the culprits in both cases were Italian anarchists” (274). Bryson explains that this thinking fit into the larger context of the Great Red Scare that followed World War I. Fears of espionage and anti-American activities fueled the mass arrest and imprisonment of many immigrants in the United States under the guise of stamping out terrorist anarchy. Bryson notes there was genuine violence—like bombings—as well as clandestine distribution of anarchist leaflets and literature, but raids and arrests targeted people for their class and ethnic status instead of demonstrable threats to national security.
Police arrested Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti for these reasons, “even though neither had a criminal record or links to any criminal gangs” (283). They were convicted. Some public figures criticized the decision, but no genuine retrial took place. The two awaited execution.
Chapter 21 shifts to Coolidge, still enjoying South Dakota. In early August, he announced he would not run for reelection. Soon after that announcement, he stopped by Mount Rushmore in the Black Hills, where he dedicated the site of the future sculpture installation of artist Gutzon Borglum. Bryson exposes Borglum’s racism (he was a member of the Ku Klux Klan) and his “slightly mad” nature (299). (Bryson does not add that the Black Hills were (and are) sacred lands to the Lakota people (alternatively known as the “Sioux”), and this dedication of land was an outright affront to tribal sovereignty.) It would take many years for the busts of Washington, Jefferson, Lincoln, and Theodore Roosevelt to be carved, but August represented the “symbolic beginning of work, and everyone went away happy” (300).
Bryson follows up on a few more storylines. Lindbergh’s tour of the US continued, much to his increasing frustration and exhaustion. Wayne B. Wheeler, the most fervent Prohibition supporter and “its chief fund-raiser” died, which was the turning point for the movement Bryson earlier flagged (302). And entrepreneurs erected the forerunner of the American shopping mall in Cleveland.
Bryson notes that Lindbergh “faced more dangers flying around America than he ever had on his flight to Paris” (310). Massive crowds would flood the tarmac while his landed plane was still in motion, sometimes leading to accidents. The mania for aviation continued, and a “Dole Pacific Race” followed the conquered Orteig Prize. The Dole Pacific Race was a real-time race between pilots across the Pacific from Oakland, California, to Oahu, Hawaii. It was a disaster. Three hopefuls crashed and died while preparing. Two planes eventually made it to Oahu, but two more were never seen again. Other disappearances over different courses followed. Simultaneously, a few successful record-breaking flights took place elsewhere. For example, two men flew almost 13,000 miles in 19 days.
Bryson then discusses Hollywood and the film industry. He says that “the golden age of the picture palace was the 1920s” (320), when people would attend screenings in elaborate, opulent auditoriums. There, they saw not just movies, but “musical performances, newsreels, serials, a comic turn, perhaps a magician or other novelty act, dance demonstrations, a round or two of a popular game called Screeno” (320). It was also a period of flux for the movie industry. Technology finally advanced enough to move beyond silent films and incorporate sound. These new “talkies” changed the job of actors, and some previously famous actors in silent films could not adapt. In other cases, stage actors moved into Hollywood because they were used to utilizing their voices. The major change this new era of film wrought was the worldwide dissemination of “American speech […] thoughts […] attitudes […] humor and sensibilities” (334). This influence would never be undone.
These chapters return to the anarchists. First, Bryson discusses execution in general. The state carried out executions with electrocution, but it was a delicate process that often went wrong, subjecting victims to prolonged deaths defined by torture instead of the intended swiftness. One man named Robert Elliott more or less fixed the process and “became America’s top executioner” by using his own products and working for hire (335), developing what was essentially a one-man electrocution industry. Charlestown State Prison hired Elliott to execute Sacco and Vanzetti on the night of August 10. A last-minute intervention from the Massachusetts governor delayed the execution and gave the lawyer who represented the two convicted men 12 more days “to find a court prepared to grant a retrial or hear new evidence” (340). The governor was one of many who sympathized with Sacco and Vanzetti, the latter of whom he had grown fond. No court, however, would oblige. Sacco and Vanzetti were executed on August 22.
Sacco’s last words were farewells to his family and, in Italian, “Long live anarchy!” (341). Vanzetti proclaimed innocence and thanked everyone present for their services. Americans had what Bryson calls a “muted” reaction (341), but other parts of the world erupted into violent protest and vehement anti-American demonstrations.
Bryson takes up the question of the innocence or guilt of Sacco and Vanzetti, a subject that received much attention from authors in the century following their executions. He concludes that they were likely “not perhaps as innocent as they made themselves out” (343), though he does not confirm that they committed the murders for which they were prosecuted.
Bryson then returns to Babe Ruth, who was, in 1927, living in an enormous suite in the Ansonia Hotel. He was the highest paid ball player, still loved to party, and had a tangled web of personal drama he liked to escape from on road trips with the team. These road trips could be quite busy and involve all different sorts of transportation, though Bryson talks the most about special train cars for the players and team staff. The team attracted thousands of fans on the road because of Babe Ruth and Lou Gehrig’s home run race. Bryson explains, “There really had never been anything like it […] By now people were practically having heart attacks” from excitement (353). People also remained excited over Lindbergh, who continued his tour and recorded impressive and captivating regular flying times in an era of slow ground transportation.
This is the first section that focuses on two men instead of a single central figure, as well as the first time Bryson devotes a section to characters who were not native-born Americans. As usual, Sacco and Vanzetti title the section but do not appear in every chapter. Unusually, these lead characters die in the section centered on them. The circumstances of the history (darker and less celebratory than the stories of the other characters) represent a turning point in the book in which Bryson starts to examine bigotry more explicitly. No matter the depths of their crimes, Sacco and Vanzetti’s experiences were strongly shaped by the anti-immigrant and anti-Italian sentiments rampant in mainstream US culture. American prejudice is discussed even more in-depth in the last section of the book.
Emphasis on immigrant stories illuminates not only American racism and ethnic-based prejudice, but also the class politics of urban America at the time. Immigrants often worked for poor wages in dangerous working conditions, systemically kept in poverty and negatively stereotyped because of intersecting racism and classism. Bryson raises the story of Sacco and Vanzetti as a symbolic intersection of the immigrant experience and its global repercussions.
Some high-profile crimes and scandals (like the Sash Weight Murder and Al Capone’s bootlegger circle) were previously discussed in the book, but Bryson illuminates the great sensation and interesting drama they produced in American media. This section mentions a different type of crime, not so romanticized at the time or since. He specifically references bombs detonating in public spaces or targeting government officials in their homes. Despite all the excitement of the zeitgeist celebrities, the booming economy, and the rapid technological innovations, the 1920s were years full of fear, violence, and tragedy. If Bryson hooks readers initially with the romance and the ballyhoo, he delivers these sobering reminders in the second half of the book to temper the sensationalized images that survive about the decade.
The end of Part 4 is one of the most pronounced cliffhangers in the book. After briefly mentioning that Lindbergh was still on tour, Bryson says, “Charles Lindbergh would no longer be anybody’s hero” (355). The author hints throughout the book that fame would not ultimately suit Lindbergh, who had antisemitic views, though these references were largely in passing thus far. Lindbergh has remained an American hero through the narrative, received by ardent and adoring fans as he himself grew restless and exhausted from constant travel and celebration.
By the end of the section, several storylines are nearly at their climax. Not only is a turning point imminent for Lindbergh, but the reader knows Babe Ruth and Lou Gehrig are competing head-to-head for the most home runs in a tight contest, Herbert Hoover will make the decision to run for president, and the American economy will continue racing toward catastrophe undetected by most observers at the time. Bryson steadily develops these storylines throughout the book (as they developed throughout the summer of 1927). The exception is the Sacco and Vanzetti storyline, which culminates in their executions and the worldwide reaction to them. Still, their example highlights a change in international opinion toward anti-Americanism. Those sentiments outlived the summer.



Unlock all 51 pages of this Study Guide
Get in-depth, chapter-by-chapter summaries and analysis from our literary experts.