Operation Paperclip: The Secret Intelligence Program that Brought Nazi Scientists to America

Annie Jacobsen

75 pages 2-hour read

Annie Jacobsen

Operation Paperclip: The Secret Intelligence Program that Brought Nazi Scientists to America

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 2014

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Part 3Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Content Warning: This section of the guide includes discussion of racism, religious discrimination, sexual violence and/or harassment, rape, ableism, child death, animal cruelty and/or death, graphic violence, illness or death, physical abuse, and emotional abuse.

Part 3, Chapter 11 Summary: “The Ticking Clock”

By the summer of 1945, the Nazi scientist program underwent a major reorganization. Control transferred from the Military Intelligence Division to the Joint Chiefs of Staff, with a newly created body, the Joint Intelligence Objectives Agency (JIOA), assuming command. The JIOA operated as a subcommittee of the powerful Joint Intelligence Committee (JIC). Between June and August 1945, the JIC produced numerous intelligence reports focused on the Soviet Union, which it identified as ideologically hostile and seeking global domination. In September, the JIC warned that the Soviets would be ready for total war with the United States by 1952. An October report claimed eight of 10 leading German missile scientists had gone missing and were likely working for the USSR. This climate of suspicion drove the JIOA’s aggressive stance: The program must achieve military supremacy over the Soviets, regardless of the scientists’ Nazi affiliations.


The JIOA’s governing structure included three military intelligence representatives and one State Department officer. That officer, Samuel Klaus, a 42-year-old lawyer and Hebrew scholar, became a persistent obstacle. Drawing on his wartime experience running Operation Safe Haven—a program to capture Nazi assets—Klaus concluded that ordinary Germans profited from and understood Nazi atrocities. He viewed the scientists as amoral opportunists and vowed that fewer than a dozen would enter America.


Meanwhile, John C. Green, the Commerce Department representative, devised a plan to circumvent Klaus. Secretary Henry Wallace had tasked Commerce with releasing captured German scientific information as a form of reparations to boost American prosperity. Green traveled to Wright Field, where the first six German specialists—Dr. Gerhard Braun, Dr. Theodor Zobel, Dr. Rudolph Edse, Mr. Otto Bock, Mr. Hans Rister, and Mr. Albert Patin—lived in isolation. These men lived in relative comfort, but they felt disdained by their American counterparts and complained of being treated like caged animals.


Colonel Donald Putt, who oversaw the Germans, wanted them to collaborate with defense contractors, but the War Department insisted on secrecy. Green, after meeting Putt, saw an opportunity and appealed directly to Wallace. On December 4, 1945, Wallace wrote to President Truman endorsing the program, framing it as a path to prosperity rather than purely military gain. His support provided crucial political cover for a controversial initiative.


In November 1945, the Washington Post published a leaked report about Nazi experiments at Dachau, horrifying the American public. What remained hidden was that several doctors involved in these crimes now worked at a secret US facility that employed 58 German physicians handpicked by Dr. Hubertus Strughold.


Colonel Harry Armstrong, who became the first flight surgeon to make a free-fall parachute jump in the 1920s, pioneered research on altitude and discovered that body fluids boil at 63,000 feet (the Armstrong line). In 1937, he met Dr. Hubertus Strughold at an international convention. Strughold, inspired by Halley’s Comet as a child and nearly blinded by a solar eclipse, built his career conducting extreme auto-experimentation. He hired World War I flying ace Robert Ritter von Greim as his mentor and later received a Rockefeller fellowship to work in America. After Hitler took power, von Greim’s connections helped Strughold rise to direct the Aviation Medical Research Institute in Berlin, where he worked closely with Dr. Theodor Benzinger and Dr. Siegfried Ruff.


After the war, Strughold brought both men to Heidelberg. Benzinger was a committed Nazi and Ruff had supervised medical experiments at Dachau. Also at the facility was Dr. Konrad Schäfer, who tested a seawater desalination method on concentration camp prisoners, and Dr. Hermann Becker-Freyseng, known for nearly fatal auto-experimentation. These men now continued their research for the US Army. A classified list of doctors involved in Nazi medical murder programs included five Heidelberg employees—Benzinger, Ruff, Schäfer, Becker-Freyseng, and Dr. Oskar Schröder—but the facility’s commander, Robert J. Benford, kept them employed and the list secret.

Part 3, Chapter 12 Summary: “Total War of Apocalyptic Proportions”

By January 1946, 160 Nazi scientists had been brought to America, including 115 rocket specialists at Fort Bliss, Texas, led by Wernher von Braun. Von Braun relished his Western surroundings and began writing science fiction novels. He underwent two personal transformations: becoming a born-again Christian and planning to marry his 18-year-old first cousin, Maria von Quistorp. In April, after a V-2 launch at White Sands reached three miles, von Braun drafted a proposal to fit his missiles with atomic weapons.


At Wright Field, Colonel Putt grew frustrated with the slow pace of recruitment and the idleness of 30 German scientists. Albert Patin presented a list of their grievances, including poor living conditions, lack of challenging work, and distrust of their American hosts. Army intelligence intercepted a letter to Patin discussing offers from French and Russian agents. Brigadier General John A. Samford forwarded the situation to the War Department, warning that valuable scientists might defect.


The Joint Intelligence Committee responded with alarming assessments. A report incorrectly claimed German physicists were helping the Soviets build an atomic bomb (information that actually came from the spy, Klaus Fuchs) and recommended bringing 1,000 additional Germans to America at any cost. Samuel Klaus objected, but the emerging Soviet threat shifted the debate. Secretary of War Robert Patterson, previously skeptical, now championed the program. On March 4, 1946, the State-War-Navy Coordinating Committee declared the program to be in the national interest. General Joseph T. McNarney was ordered to identify 1,000 scientists for immediate recruitment, with their families to be housed at a secret facility in Landshut.


The JIOA devised a workaround for scientists with problematic Nazi backgrounds: They would attach a paperclip to these files as a signal to delay State Department review. This gave the program its new code name: Operation Paperclip. In July, however, McNarney reported that many of the identified scientists were former Nazis who could not be employed under current denazification rules. The JIOA responded by changing its guiding principle to exclude only those who might work toward Germany’s military resurgence.


Cold War tensions escalated dramatically. George F. Kennan’s Long Telegram warned that permanent peaceful coexistence with the Soviets was impossible. White House counsel Clark Clifford prepared a report concluding that the United States must prepare to use military power in the inevitable conflict. On August 30, Undersecretary of State Dean Acheson urged President Truman to act quickly or risk losing scientists to other nations. Four days later, Truman officially approved expanding the program to 1,000 scientists.


The JIC produced its own assessment, predicting a future war with the Soviet Union would be an apocalyptic total war without humanitarian restraints. This drove interest in Dr. Kurt Blome, Hitler’s biological weapons expert, who remained employed by the US Army in Darmstadt. The public learned about America’s own wartime bioweapons program when the War Department released the Merck Report in January 1946. Written by pharmaceutical executive George W. Merck, the report argued that biological weapons were a poor man’s nuclear option and America must maintain its program. Congress responded with massive funding for Camp Detrick.


In August, the Soviets produced a surprise witness at Nuremberg: Major General Walter Schreiber, who had been in Soviet custody for 16 months. On August 26, Schreiber testified that Hitler ordered preparations for biological warfare and placed Dr. Kurt Blome in charge of an institute in Posen. He claimed Blome panicked when the Red Army advanced, worried they would discover installations for human experiments. During cross-examination, defense lawyer Dr. Hans Laternser caught Schreiber in a lie about a memorandum, but Schreiber was not recalled and was returned to Moscow. Two days later, Blome was arrested and imprisoned at Nuremberg to await trial.


On September 17, military security officers arrived at the Heidelberg facility and arrested five doctors (Benzinger, Ruff, Schäfer, Becker-Freyseng, and Schröder) for war crimes. The arrests threatened to expose Operation Paperclip and create an international scandal. During Benzinger’s pretrial investigation, prosecutors revealed he had attended a private screening of medical murder films for Himmler. Benzinger was announced as a defendant on October 12 but was mysteriously released on October 23 and returned to US Army custody. Medical historian Paul Weindling later suggested that the Army Air Forces valued Benzinger’s expertise on high-altitude aircraft more than prosecuting him. Prosecutor Alexander G. Hardy was outraged by the release. In February 1947, Benzinger became one of the first Heidelberg doctors shipped to America under Operation Paperclip.


The first Nuremberg trial concluded on October 1 with 12 death sentences. Hermann Göring died by suicide with a cyanide vial. On October 16, Master Sergeant John C. Woods hanged 10 Nazi officials. Their bodies were cremated at Dachau and their ashes thrown into a river.

Part 3, Chapter 13 Summary: “Science at Any Price”

In October 1946, Undersecretary of State Dean Acheson and Samuel Klaus encountered a troubling development. The JIOA had issued directive 257/22, effectively seizing control of the visa approval process. Director Colonel Thomas Ford declared that JIOA security reports would be accepted as final, and the program was now officially a denial operation, keeping scientists from the Soviets at any cost.


Three weeks later, the New York Times, reported the program’s existence for the first time. Newsweek revealed the name Operation Paperclip. The War Department responded with a public relations campaign, holding an open house featuring carefully selected scientists like dirigible expert Theodor Knacke, Zeppelin chairman Hugo Eckener, and jet inventor Alexander Lippisch. By mistake, reporters were allowed to speak with Ernst Eckert, a former SS and SA member. More problematic scientists (including aerodynamicist Rudolf Hermann, who wore his SA uniform at work, and engineer Emil Salmon, who allegedly burned down a synagogue) were kept hidden.


Public backlash was swift; polls showed most Americans opposed the program. Rabbi Stephen S. Wise, Eleanor Roosevelt, and Albert Einstein organized protests. Syracuse University professors objected when the Army placed Dr. Heinz Fischer, a former Nazi Party member, in their laboratories. The Federation of American Scientists asked President Truman to end the program. In the winter of 1947, the War Department forbade further information releases about the program.


Meanwhile, at Wright Field, engineer Georg Rickhey’s downfall unfolded. Recruited for his expertise building underground facilities, Rickhey and Albert Patin operated a black-market business at the Hilltop. During a late-night card game in October 1946, after engineer Hermann Nehlsen turned off their lamp to quiet them down, a drunk Rickhey lit a candle and made an antisemitic joke. The incident proved to be a tipping point for Nehlsen, who complained to Colonel Putt, who revealed that Rickhey ordered a mass hanging of prisoners at Nordhausen and that Patin used forced labor. Putt, who relied on Patin as an informant, ignored the complaint and transferred Nehlsen to Mitchel Field. Nehlsen’s letter to a friend describing the incident was intercepted by mail censors and reached Colonel Millard Lewis at Air Force Headquarters. Lewis ordered Major Eugene Smith to investigate. In January 1947, unaware of this probe, Putt recommended Rickhey for a five-year contract, which was approved. Captain Albert Abels dismissed the allegations as petty jealousy, but Smith persisted.


At Mitchel Field, Nehlsen and engineer Werner Voss provided sworn statements about the hangings. Smith traveled to Fort Bliss, where Wernher and Magnus von Braun were conveniently unavailable. Other Nordhausen engineers were evasive but helped draw a tunnel diagram. Arthur Rudolph initially denied seeing abuse but inadvertently revealed he had witnessed the hangings. Smith concluded the scientists were collectively covering up Nordhausen’s crimes.


In May 1947, war crimes investigator William Aalmans spotted Rickhey’s name in Stars and Stripes. An arrest warrant was issued on May 19, and Major George P. Miller escorted Rickhey back to Germany. JIOA deputy director Bosquet N. Wev alerted FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover to keep the situation quiet. On August 7, Rickhey appeared as one of 19 defendants in the Dora-Nordhausen trial. The Army refused to let von Braun testify, citing kidnapping risks (though von Braun had recently traveled to Germany to marry). Though 15 defendants were convicted, Rickhey was acquitted. The Army immediately classified the entire trial record for 40 years.


That same month, top Reich pilot Siegfried Knemeyer arrived at Wright Field with his wife, Doris, and seven children. General Walter Dornberger also arrived after his release from British prison, where he had been labeled a menace. Dornberger wrote a classified pitch for the Ordnance Department arguing that missile development should proceed even if it violated American democratic ideals.


The Axster case further damaged the program’s reputation. Herbert Axster, a patent lawyer and former Wehrmacht officer, and his wife Ilse, a leader in a Nazi women’s organization, were exposed after German neighbors reported that Ilse used a horsewhip on the 40 enslaved laborers they kept on their estate. The Department of Justice withdrew Herbert’s application for legal immigration, but the couple was not deported and eventually opened a law firm in Milwaukee.

Part 3, Chapter 14 Summary: “Strange Judgment”

The Nuremberg doctors’ trial began December 9, 1946, the first of 12 subsequent proceedings prosecuted solely by the United States after Soviet-American cooperation collapsed. Brigadier General Telford Taylor opened by declaring the trial would create an undeniable record proving the crimes were fact, not fable. Leopold Alexander served as the prosecution’s expert consultant and later authored the Nuremberg Code. A crucial fact remained hidden, however, as four defendants—Siegfried Ruff, Konrad Schäfer, Hermann Becker-Freyseng, and Oskar Schröder—had recently worked for the US Army at the Heidelberg facility.


Ruff admitted to overseeing the Dachau medical murders but argued that using condemned prisoners for experiments was not immoral in wartime. Schäfer’s case proved more difficult for prosecutors. Though he developed the seawater desalination process and knew prisoners would be test subjects, no evidence placed him at Dachau. The sole surviving victim, Karl Höllenrainer, provided the most dramatic testimony. Höllenrainer took the stand. A small, nervous man, he explained he was arrested for being a “Gypsy of mixed blood” (268) who married a German woman. After passing through Auschwitz and Buchenwald, he was sent to Dachau for the seawater experiments, during which a doctor removed a piece of his liver without anesthesia. When asked to identify the perpetrator, Höllenrainer leaped over the defense tables, dagger raised, lunging at Dr. Wilhelm Beiglböck, the doctor in charge of the saltwater experiments. Military police subdued him just before he reached his target.


Presiding Judge Walter Beals immediately sentenced Höllenrainer to 90 days in the same prison housing the Nazi doctors. Höllenrainer pleaded that Beiglböck was a murderer who ruined his life, but Beals was unmoved. That night, Alexander, conflicted about having put the traumatized witness on the stand, advocated for his release. Beals showed clemency, releasing Höllenrainer into Alexander’s custody. Four days later, Höllenrainer continued his testimony, describing how his friends foamed at the mouth and suffered fits before dying of thirst. During cross-examination, defense lawyer Herr Steinbauer accused him of lying and made racist remarks about Romani people.


In a private letter to Taylor, Alexander compared the Nazi doctors to Tantalus, the mythical ruler who killed his own child for advancement. In another letter to his wife, Alexander revealed that he and Beiglböck were medical school classmates in Vienna before the war, though Beiglböck did not recognize him.


Dr. Kurt Blome’s case hinged on intent versus action. He admitted planning human experiments for plague research but argued he never conducted them. The prosecution lacked witnesses or documents proving otherwise. His defense counsel, Robert Servatius, read a June 1945 Life magazine article detailing US experiments on 800 prisoners. The article, unknown to the American judges and most prosecutors, suggested both nations conducted wartime human testing and undermined the prosecution’s moral authority.


On August 6, 1947, the verdicts were announced. Seven doctors received death sentences, nine received prison terms—including Beiglböck (15 years), Becker-Freyseng (20 years), and Schröder (life)—and seven were acquitted, including Blome, Schäfer, and Ruff. The judges noted that while Blome may have been preparing for human experiments, the record failed to prove he conducted them.


Schäfer returned to Heidelberg and assumed Strughold’s former position as chief of staff. Strughold was already at the School of Aviation Medicine at Randolph Field, serving as professional advisor to Colonel Armstrong. When the FBI encountered difficulty approving Strughold’s visa, Schäfer wrote a recommendation praising his former boss’s ethical principles. The following year, Schäfer himself arrived in America under Operation Paperclip. As for Blome, his high profile initially made his recruitment too difficult but, as Cold War tensions mounted, he would be deemed eligible.

Part 3 Analysis

Part 3 portrays a significant institutional shift, emphasizing The Moral Compromise of National Security. Following the transfer of the Nazi scientist program to the JIOA, the primary directive changed from moral exclusion to strategic acquisition. Initially bound by policies that excluded any individual who was a “no known or alleged war criminal” (193), the military intelligence apparatus deliberately altered its criteria to bypass denazification rules. This redefinition effectively separated men like von Braun and Patin from their historical context. The justification for this pivot relied on the imminent Cold War, specifically intelligence reports forecasting total war with the Soviet Union. Because the JIC concluded that the United States must rely on the “language of military power” (229) to counter Soviet expansion, the criminal pasts of the recruits became secondary. By framing the recruitment as an existential necessity, American institutions established a paradigm in which a geopolitical threat nullified broader moral objections, and this pattern demonstrated that state institutions often prioritized future military supremacy over retrospective accountability.


Operation Paperclip further interrogates the ethics of the recruits by contrasting the concept of scientific auto-experimentation with the reality of forced torture. Luftwaffe physicians like Hubertus Strughold and Hermann Becker-Freyseng are initially framed as dedicated pioneers who subjected themselves to experiments. However, the narrative contrasts these voluntary risks with the subsequent revelation that these same men directed or relied upon lethal experiments that they had forced upon concentration camp prisoners. This contradiction is epitomized by the saltwater drinkability tests, where physicians sought remedies for downed pilots by forcing prisoners to ingest chemically processed seawater until they died. The scientists’ willingness to endanger themselves for the sake of their profession was thus revealed as an ambition that extended to the exploitation of captive subjects, and these men blatantly ignored the ethical foundations of modern medicine. As Leopold Alexander summarizes, this willingness to harm others revealed that the accused had “slaughtered for gain of scientific renown [and] personal advancement” (272-73). This duality suggests that scientific inquiry, when unmoored from ethical constraints, can lead to barbarism that masquerades as intellectual progress.


Finally, Jacobsen’s depiction of the Nuremberg doctors’ trial explores the theme of the moral compromise of national security. The tribunal was intended to establish an undeniable record of Nazi atrocities, yet the proceedings frequently prioritized legal formalism over actual justice. This disconnect was illustrated when Judge Beals sentenced concentration camp survivor Karl Höllenrainer to prison for attacking his former torturer in the courtroom. Beals’s adherence to decorum punished the victim, exposing a judicial system that was fully alienated from the reality of the crimes it was meant to judge. Concurrently, the trial’s moral authority was entirely undermined by American hypocrisy. While prosecutors condemned the German doctors, the US Army shielded the Heidelberg physicians in its employ, classified the trial records of acquitted engineer Georg Rickhey, and orchestrated press events to present other recruits as benign innovators. The acquittal of Dr. Kurt Blome further eroded the tribunal’s standing; the defense’s discussion of US wartime experiments on prisoners demonstrated that legal technicalities and shared culpability could compromise the proceedings. The subsequent recruitment of acquitted defendants like Konrad Schäfer confirmed that the pursuit of justice would remain subordinate to the pragmatic demands of the emerging Cold War.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Unlock all 75 pages of this Study Guide

Get in-depth, chapter-by-chapter summaries and analysis from our literary experts.

  • Grasp challenging concepts with clear, comprehensive explanations
  • Revisit key plot points and ideas without rereading the book
  • Share impressive insights in classes and book clubs