50 pages • 1-hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Content Warning: This section depicts child death.
Dathan Auerbach’s novel traces one character’s change in worldview as he gradually grows up to accept that the world is a cruel and cold place. Auerbach parallels his unnamed narrator’s realizations with the gradual development of the town in which he lives. In this way, the novel can also be read as a critique on nostalgia and urban development.
The narrator and his mother move into the neighborhood when the town it’s attached to is still small. The family’s financial status provides the impetus for their move; they’re drawn to the neighborhood because the relatively low cost of living enables them to keep a home in a suburban community. The narrator regards his earliest years in the town as a happy time: “I thought my home was as close to a palace as one could hope for” (14). His rosy perspective of the neighborhood extends to the woods behind his home, his oldest play area and the site of many excursions that feed his imagination. At this point, his fear of monsters remains rooted in the imaginary world. The threat of the woods remains abstract, kept at a distance by the safety of the real world. The narrator’s first interactions with his pen pal show how easy it is to pierce that veil of safety, resulting in the attempt to abduct the narrator and take him into the woods. While Josh’s friendship helps the narrator to feel safe in the woods again, it exposes him to the same threat and ultimately causes Josh’s death.
Throughout the narrator’s childhood, the people he meets in the town continuously infringe on the sense of security he gets from his neighborhood. For instance, while he perceives Mrs. Maggie as a warm elderly woman who never fails to extend her hospitality to him and Josh, his mother warns him to decline Mrs. Maggie’s invitations to enter her home. Even though the narrator’s mother explains that Mrs. Maggie has Alzheimer’s disease, she never fully explains why the narrator must always decline her invitations, as if they’re a pretense for something sinister. Similarly, each interaction he has with a stranger from the town is tinged with an air of menace, from the police officer with a large burn scar to the sweaty ticket seller at the cinema the narrator frequents. All of them are potentially the narrator’s pen pal, though Auerbach purposely leaves the pen pal’s real identity ambiguous so that his menace sustains through to the novel’s end, even after he’s confirmed dead.
In Chapter 6, the teen narrator exists in a version of the town that has already entered a state of decay. He frequents a poorly maintained cinema called The Dirt Theatre, next to an abandoned mall that is rumored to have been haunted by a monster that lived under its floors. The fact that the urban legend surrounding the mall mirrors the narrator’s discovery that someone was living under his old house ties his personal experience to the town’s history. Other parts of the town likewise hint at a dark history. Just as the narrator finds abandoned developments in the thick of the woods, he finds his own house left to rot, giving his pen pal free rein to decorate his old room with evidence of his transgression.
The implied subtext of this parallel is that while the town grew, it didn’t necessarily improve or foster better social conditions. As the novel ends, the narrator has conflicting emotions about becoming friends with Josh, regretting that their friendship led to Josh’s demise. This regret could easily extend to moving to the town in the first place, pursuing a better life and instead living in fear of the consequences.
The second most prominent character in the novel besides the narrator is his mother, whose attempts to protect her son from the truth present clear obstacles in his quest to learn the truth of what happened to him and Josh. However, this doesn’t make the mother an antagonist, especially since the truth, once the narrator learns it, is so terrifying that he regrets ever befriending Josh at all. Instead, the novel examines the complex moral alignment of the narrator’s mother to question how far parents must go to protect their children.
The narrator characterizes his mother as a strict rule-maker from her first appearance in the novel. In Chapters 2 and 3, the reasons for this become clear after the pen pal attempts to abduct the narrator. His mother’s first instinct is to call the police, which reveals to him that something’s wrong with what’s happening to him. However, because the pen pal continues to act on his proximity to the narrator, taking up residence in the crawlspace under the house, the novel implies that the police investigation’s attempts to find the pen pal go nowhere. The narrator’s mother takes matters into her own hands by moving herself and her son to another home.
The move helps keep him safe but leads him to suspect that his mother is lying to protect him. Initially, he believes that his mother lied outright when she expedited their move, because he assumed that new residents were moving in. When he confronts his mother many years later, she defends her actions by pointing out that she never lied. This creates a dynamic of unreliability between the narrator and his mother since the narrator can’t distinguish between misremembered details and a genuine attempt to withhold the truth from him. In any case, the mother’s moral alignment falls under doubt. While her motivations to protect her son remain clear, the narrator can’t proceed in his quest to learn the truth unless she tells him what happened. She must act against her instinct to protect her son, as well as her emotional stability, in order to support the narrator’s journey.
This culminates in the revelation that the narrator’s mother actively withheld the truth—not just from him but also from Josh’s parents. Part of the terror of learning about Josh’s death stems from the knowledge that the narrator’s mother could have prevented the outcome had she shared the truth with Josh’s parents. The narrator reasons, however, that the cost of telling them would be the semblance of a “normal” life, something she realizes too late (after Josh’s death) that they can never have again. To admit the truth would be to implicate herself in Josh’s death, even though it wasn’t something she actively intended. This drives the complexity in the mother’s narrative arc: She chose to prioritize her family’s needs over those of her neighbors. Her and her son’s well-being comes at the cost of Josh and Veronica’s lives. For the rest of her life, she reckons with her decision and withholds the truth not out of a desire for normalcy but out of guilt. Although their relationship becomes strained at the novel’s end, the narrator acknowledges that his mother is “stronger than [he] will ever be” (238). He understands her, even though her actions indirectly affect him.
The narrator sets himself on a quest to discover the truth about his past, but this quest is riddled with challenges that emphasize how learning the truth has consequences. By the novel’s end, the narrator must reckon with these consequences as his worldview irrevocably changes.
In the first chapter, the narrator cites his own distance from the past as an obstacle to remembering what really happened. As the novel progresses, it becomes clear that his cognitive abilities as a child didn’t allow him to draw connections among the strange things that occurred. This requires him to enlist the help of his mother, who the novel reveals actively withheld the truth from him for years. Her choices are motivated by a desire to preserve a sense of normalcy for her son and ensure her own emotional stability. In Chapter 4, the narrator confronts his mother about someone living in their old house. She emphasizes that she always told him the truth that someone was living there. Only then does the narrator understand the full context of her words, and the narrator’s mother curses him for accusing her of lying to him. This warning should suffice as an indicator that the truth may be too terrifying to learn, yet he presses on, demanding the truth at the cost of his mother’s emotions. The narrator’s actions suggest that he feels entitled to know the truth, though he can’t imagine why his mother would hide it from him.
When the narrator encounters Veronica in Chapter 6, his interest in courting her, and his interest in reuniting with Josh, indirectly leads to her death. When the narrator starts to probe into the collapse of his friendship with Josh, Veronica initially resists the topic, suggesting that something about Josh is too upsetting for her to remember. She tells him about Josh’s disappearance only when she’s close to death, realizing that she may not have another chance to share what happened. The narrator again receives a warning about his pursuit of the truth. When Veronica mentions the note Josh left to explain his disappearance, the narrator weeps, subconsciously remembering his own experience as he recounted it in Chapter 2. This scene foreshadows the dark secret the narrator learns in Chapter 7 about Josh’s ultimate fate, but the narrator presses on.
The novel ends with the narrator learning that the circumstances of Josh’s death remained a secret to all but the narrator’s mother. He realizes that his mother withheld the truth not only from him but also from Josh’s parents, making them think that their children’s deaths were acts of random violence, not the result of the pen pal’s obsession with the narrator. This makes the narrator feel complicit in the grief that Josh’s family experiences because his affinity for Josh and Veronica led both of them to their deaths. Beyond regretting his quest to learn the truth, he regrets his friendship with Josh, believing that had events unfolded differently, Josh and his sister would likely still be alive. Exacerbating his sadness, the revelation of Josh’s death strains the narrator’s relationship with his mother, leaving him alone to deal with the consequences of his quest. In this way, Auerbach raises an existential quandary about the value of the truth: whether it’s better to know or to remain in the shadow of ignorance. Knowing what happened to Josh agonizes the narrator, and it brings him no relief that the identity of his pen pal remains an unsolved mystery.



Unlock every key theme and why it matters
Get in-depth breakdowns of the book’s main ideas and how they connect and evolve.