34 pages • 1-hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Supplement 2 introduces the concept of a secret article: A proposal that philosophers should be consulted on matters of international politics. This seemingly self-serving article presents a serious argument, in which Kant asserts that reason and moral reflection must guide political decisions. Political figures, driven by ambition or convenience, often act from interest rather than moral principle. Though philosophers are not rulers, they represent the impartial use of reason that can illuminate what a moral law should look like.
Kant’s secret article implies a critique of political realism. He insists that peace cannot be achieved through strategic diplomacy or the balancing of power alone. Peace requires moral judgment. The role of the philosopher is to clarify the principles that make moral governance possible.
The secret article is brief but conceptually rich. Kant’s argument that rulers should consult philosophers explores the relationship between knowledge and power, connecting the Enlightenment’s faith in reason as a public good with governance. It foreshadows Hannah Arendt’s later idea of the public realm, where thinking and judgment sustain political life. By introducing this secret clause, Kant transforms philosophy from abstract metaphysical musing to a tool for civics and international ethics.
Kant distinguishes between the prudence of governing leaders and the wisdom of philosophers. Governing leaders are focused on necessity while philosophers speak from the standpoint of right. By suggesting that rulers secretly consult reason, Kant inverts the Enlightenment cliché that philosophers merely dream while politicians act. Here, thought itself becomes a form of political action.
This section dramatizes the tension between theory and practice that runs throughout the essay. Kant admits that moral reason cannot coerce rulers, but he refuses to concede that morality is irrelevant. While Kant claims to offer a sound framework for peaceful future legislation, his essay presents a collection of political philosophical ideas rather than a practical blueprint. Kant also reveals his own limitations: The philosopher remains implicitly European and male, speaking as the universal voice of reason. A decolonial reading might ask whose knowledge counts as philosophy, and whose counsel is still excluded. However, Kant’s argument is important because it shows the philosopher’s independence from power, which is what grants philosophy the moral authority.
At the same time, this secret article illuminates The Moral Obligation of States. Rulers have an ethical duty to align political practice with universal principles of right. Consulting philosophers symbolizes the recognition that sovereignty does not absolve moral responsibility. It also reinforces Kant’s view that reason is the ultimate foundation for legitimacy. Furthermore, the call to ground politics in philosophical reason anticipates Kant’s vision of Republican Constitutions as a Framework for Peace. A true republic, according to Kant, is one in which laws are shaped by rational deliberation and moral contemplation.



Unlock all 34 pages of this Study Guide
Get in-depth, chapter-by-chapter summaries and analysis from our literary experts.