50 pages 1-hour read

Postmortem

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 1990

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Chapters 5-8Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Content Warning: This section of the guide includes discussion of bullying, racism, gender discrimination, antigay bias, sexual violence, rape, and graphic violence.

Chapter 5 Summary

Scarpetta reflects that Marino’s misogynistic attitude toward her reminds her of the bullying she faced as one of only four women in her class at Johns Hopkins medical school. Over lunch, Scarpetta thinks about how the four victims all lived in different parts of Richmond and likely did not spend time in the same places.


The woman taking her lunch order seems to recognize her from the press coverage. Scarpetta reflects that she regrets how her “‘blond’ and ‘handsome’” appearance makes her stand out (70). She comes from a line of northern Italians. Her mother, a racist, regrets that Scarpetta has no children of her own and that her sister, Dorothy, had Lucy with a “Latin” man. After lunch, Scarpetta sees the Commonwealth of Virginia attorney Bill Boltz with Norman Tanner, the director of public safety, across the street. She waves, but they do not acknowledge her.


Back at her office, Scarpetta meets with Benton Wesley, an FBI profiler. Wesley asks if he can eat a snack in her office. She says no. He reflects that her predecessor, Doc Cagney, used to eat in the office all the time. She replies that he is lucky he did not catch AIDS that way. Wesley replies that it would have been ironic for him to get AIDS, as he was notoriously antigay.


Marino joins them. Scarpetta tells Wesley that Matt Petersen is a nonsecreter, like the murder suspect. However, 20% of people are nonsecreters, and it is not a definitive identification. They review the case files. Wesley notes that it is unusual that one of the victims, Cecile Tyler, is Black, whereas all the others are white. Wesley suspects the murderer is white, male, between 25 and 35, a loner but friendly, and has an interest in law enforcement.


They note that the murder of Lori was particularly violent and involved torture, as her fingers had been broken, suggesting that the murderer is escalating. Wesley speculates the murderer has a blue-collar job. Marino objects, arguing that the murderer could be “an actor, a creative type whose imagination’s gone apeshit” (78). He thinks Wesley and Scarpetta are overlooking the possibility that Matt is the murderer because they are white-collar professionals like Matt. Marino points out that Matt has a previous rape charge, although he was never convicted. Marino storms off.


Wesley admits that Marino has a point. He says Marino is a good detective despite his prejudices and the chip on his shoulder from growing up poor. Scarpetta is unimpressed by this “cop sob stor[y]” (83).


Scarpetta meets with Margaret, their computer analyst, who tells her that someone has attempted to remotely access Lori Petersen’s files on their database. She discovered it because her monitor was set to “echo,” or mirror, actions taken from remote computers on their system. The person did not find anything because Lori’s file had not yet been entered into the database, but they do not know if someone had previously accessed the database without Margaret knowing. Margaret notes that the password on the database had to be reset. Scarpetta is worried to learn about the data breach.


Scarpetta’s assistant tells her she is being summoned to an urgent meeting with County Commissioner Alvin Amburgey in 90 minutes.

Chapter 6 Summary

Scarpetta worries about who hacked the database and how they did it.


Before her meeting with Amburgey, Scarpetta meets with Betty, the chief serologist. She is testing the physical evidence recovery kit (PERK) from Lori Petersen’s case. Betty tells Scarpetta they should have DNA results back from the first two murders soon. Betty confirms that semen was found on Lori’s body. She also reports that the blue polyester blend fibers found on the windowsill where the murderer entered at the Petersen home do not match the cotton fibers found on the knife. Scarpetta reflects that Matt was not wearing blue polyester. Frank, the weapons analyst, reports that the survival knife was most likely used to cut Lori’s clothes and the cords used to bind her.


Scarpetta reflects that if the knife was in its usual place on the desk, the murderer could not have seen it until the lights came on, at which point, typically, Lori would have already been “subdued.” Scarpetta wonders if the killer was interrupted in his “ritual,” causing him to pause and see the knife on the desk. She wonders if Lori smelled the murderer’s distinct maple syrup odor before she saw him and that caused her to call for help.


Scarpetta worries about the meeting with Amburgey because she is not part of the “good ole boys” club like her predecessor, Cagney (72). She goes to his office. He keeps her waiting for half an hour before she is admitted into a room where Amburgey, Norman Tanner, and Bill Boltz have clearly already been meeting.


Scarpetta feels singled out as Amburgey accuses her office of being the source of leaks to the press. She denies it. He argues that a detail about Cecile Tyler being strangled with a “tan cloth belt” most likely came from her reports. He asks if her database is secure. She admits that there had been a hacking attempt the previous evening, but they had not accessed any files.


Amburgey tells Scarpetta that news will soon break that Lori Petersen called 911 at 12:49 am the night of her murder, but the call was ended before Lori said anything. The police operator categorized it as a low-priority call when such calls should be given high priority. The police quickly drove by the property 30 minutes later and did not see anything unusual. Scarpetta realizes that the murderer must have seen the knife because he came upon Lori not sleeping but sitting up and attempting to call 911.


Amburgey says that because he feels Scarpetta’s office has a risk of leaks, he wants all information to go through him. Scarpetta is outraged at the usurpation of her authority, but she concedes. She reasons that they want to put the focus on her as a scapegoat to draw attention away from the police’s failure to correctly respond to Lori’s 911 call. Amburgey wants to review the autopsy and physical analysis reports; she insists they do so in her office.

Chapter 7 Summary

The four of them sit and review the files. At one point, Boltz drops a file, and Tanner helps him reorganize the pages. Amburgey points out that the detail about the tan belt has been entered into the digital database. Scarpetta says it must be an error, because her written notes state it was a “pair of nude pantyhose” (117). Amburgey wonders if the information came from the paramedics’ report. Scarpetta argues this was not normal procedure. Amburgey nevertheless points to it as evidence that the information is coming from Scarpetta’s office.


Scarpetta returns home and cooks pasta with Lucy as a stress reliever. Lucy seems disappointed when Bill Boltz, whom Scarpetta has been casually dating, stops by, but he wins her over with his charm. After Lucy has gone to bed, Scarpetta and Boltz talk about the meeting. He suggests that perhaps Lucy hacked into the morgue database. Scarpetta doubts it, but she has to admit it is possible. She wonders if Amburgey has it out for her because she publicly contradicted him about his conclusions in the murder of a Black city councilman last year. Scarpetta is angry that Boltz did not give her a heads-up about the meeting that afternoon. They argue.


Boltz suggests that perhaps the reporter Abby Turnbull hacked into the database because “she’s vicious and manipulative and extremely dangerous” (127). Scarpetta is surprised at his anger toward the reporter. He tells Scarpetta that Abby “was all over [him]” when she was tasked with writing a profile of him for the paper (128), and she wrote a bad profile of him after he rejected her. He thinks she might be hacking information to put in the paper to tank the case and make him, the prosecutor, look bad.


Scarpetta says the DNA results will confirm the conviction, regardless of press coverage. Boltz says that juries do not understand DNA evidence because “there are very few precedents, very few convictions nationwide” (129). He thinks that the DNA evidence will only be credible if Scarpetta herself is credible, and he thinks Amburgey is planning to pin the leaks on her. He advises her to be careful.


Boltz and Scarpetta started seeing each other after going for drinks after court. Scarpetta had been struck by his sexual aggression. His wife had died by suicide only a year earlier, but Scarpetta felt uncomfortable being sexually intimate with him so soon after his wife’s death. Now, she pulls away when he kisses her as he leaves the house.

Chapter 8 Summary

Marino picks Scarpetta up in his very dirty duty car. He tells her he doesn’t bother cleaning it anymore because someone always dirties it again when he is off duty. They drive to the four crime scenes together. On the drive, he tells her that Matt Petersen passed a polygraph test. He also tells her that he looked into the rape allegations against Matt from several years ago. A fan had claimed Matt raped her, but there was no evidence, and the case was thrown out. He also says that there were three similar murders in Waltham, Massachusetts, around the time Matt was in the area attending Harvard, although they think one was a copycat killing. The murderer in that case was also a nonsecreter, and he had never been caught.


They note that all the victims are “career women” presumed to live alone. They suspect that the killer was monitoring the houses so he would know when they were alone and how to enter the houses. Marino notes that the first victim had gone to the hospital where Lori Petersen worked after a minor traffic accident. They wonder if the hospital is a point of connection between the victims. Marino notes that Cecile, the Black victim, was found by her white best friend, Bobbi, and wonders if Cecile was the only Black victim because the killer thought Bobbi lived in the house. They note all the victims were killed late Friday night or early Saturday morning, suggesting that the murderer works Monday through Friday.


Marino and Scarpetta discuss the allegations that leaks are coming from Scarpetta’s department. Marino suspects that Abby Turnbull has sources from within the police department, but he is not certain. He tells Scarpetta that Tanner, the police commissioner, had told him not to talk to her about the investigation, but he doesn’t “give a shit what Tanner says” (154). He wonders if there’s an alternative explanation for the focus on Scarpetta.

Chapters 5-8 Analysis

A core theme that connects both the crimes Scarpetta and the police are investigating and Scarpetta’s own experiences as one of the few women in her profession of medical examiner is Misogyny and Violence Against Women. As Marino and Scarpetta note, all of the victims are “career women” who were bound and sexually assaulted. In their professional assessment, this kind of crime indicates a hatred of women, and particularly professionally successful women, and a desire to control them. Scarpetta experiences something similar in her interactions with the county commissioner, Amburgey. Although he does not use violence, his attitude toward her is driven by his lack of respect for her because she is a woman. As the criminal profiler Wesley alludes to, Scarpetta is not part of the “good ole boys” club (72). “Good ole boys” is a term for the patriarchal, typically white, clique of men who are elites or leaders, often in Southern communities. They work and socialize together, and Scarpetta is isolated from this clique because of her gender and likely because she is not a native Southerner herself. As she notes dryly, “The only hunts and barbecues I was invited to were courtrooms and conferences in which targets were drawn on me and fires lit beneath my feet” (100-1). The disregard the members of this clique, which includes Amburgey, Tanner, and Boltz, have for women extends beyond their dismissal and isolation of Scarpetta herself. They also are seemingly unconcerned about the violence against women taking place in their town, beyond how it generates bad publicity and as “a potential obstruction to the tourist trade” (107). Scarpetta believes Amburgey’s resentment of her stems in part from her knowledge and ability outpacing his own.


Marino is uniquely positioned within this misogynistic system. At the opening of the novel, Scarpetta somewhat assumes that Marino shares the prejudices of the other men against her. She thinks, “I wasn’t sure if he didn’t like women, or if he just didn’t like me” (6). However, Marino ultimately rejects the men’s clique in favor of supporting Scarpetta, even though his decision is unpopular. As their investigation progresses, it is suggested that Marino’s dislike of her stems more from Scarpetta’s approach to investigations than her gender. Their dynamic is representative of the theme of Procedural Rigor Versus Intuition. Scarpetta is committed to rigorous analysis and cautious interpretation of physical evidence based on likelihoods and probabilities rather than definitive conclusions. She tries to avoid speculation. In contrast, Marino is proud of his “street smarts” and gut intuition as a method of investigating crime. In these chapters, Marino feels strongly, based on his intuition and common trends, that Lori Petersen was murdered by her husband, Matt, whereas Scarpetta feels the forensic evidence is not definitive. She argues against Marino’s firm conclusions, leading him to tell her she “sound[s] like a damn defense attorney” (74). As their relationship progresses, Marino and Scarpetta learn to collaborate and accept elements of each other’s approach, as shown in their collaborative dialogue about The Psychology of Serial Killers during their visits to the crime scenes at the end of Chapter 8.


Postmortem was published in 1990 and contains some medical and forensic details that might seem unusual to contemporary readers, such as the discussion of AIDS and the skepticism about DNA evidence. The first cases of HIV/AIDS were reported in 1981, and understanding of the disease was still relatively limited, even among medical practitioners, when Postmortem was written. While today HIV/AIDS is a well-understood, highly treatable, and preventable disease, in 1990, treatments were not as robust, and it was often deadly. The epidemic hit members of the LGBTQ community particularly hard, thus Wesley’s joke that it would have been “poetic justice” had Cagney, who was openly antigay, contracted and died of AIDS.


In addition, while today, DNA evidence is often seen as highly reliable, its use was still controversial in 1990, as it was a highly novel technology. The first person convicted on the basis of DNA evidence was Colin Pitchfork in 1986 in the UK; it was first used in the US to convict Tommie Lee Andrews in 1987. Thus, Boltz’s concern about the jury not understanding DNA evidence is realistic for the time period.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Unlock all 50 pages of this Study Guide

Get in-depth, chapter-by-chapter summaries and analysis from our literary experts.

  • Grasp challenging concepts with clear, comprehensive explanations
  • Revisit key plot points and ideas without rereading the book
  • Share impressive insights in classes and book clubs