Replaceable You: Adventures in Human Anatomy

Mary Roach

59 pages 1-hour read

Mary Roach

Replaceable You: Adventures in Human Anatomy

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 2025

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Chapters 12-15Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Content Warning: This section of the guide includes discussion of illness and ableism.

Chapter 12 Summary: “The Last Six Inches”

Roach defines the word “stoma,” which comes from Greek and means “mouth,”  and compares it to the word “stigma,” which also comes from Greek. United Ostomy Associations of America (UOAA) seeks to normalize ostomy, a surgery that creates an opening in the digestive system to divert waste, but the stigma remains. Ed Pfueller, a UOAA director, pushes awareness efforts with limited success. 


A planned Durham 5K is canceled, so Roach reroutes to a race in Arizona to raise awareness for the issue. She arrives to vendor tables and a giant inflatable colon. Debra Adinolfi, with the Arizona UOAA affiliate, demonstrates pouch options; Roach selects a one-piece pouch to wear during the race, and learns how users manage output.


At the start line, the narrator meets Rebecca, a young ileostomate who describes improved life since surgery, and Dave Rudzin, a long-time ostomate and former UOAA president. During the walk, Rudzin recounts ongoing prejudice and criticizes surgeons who express disdain toward ostomy. While Roach and Rudzin walk the race while chatting, Rebecca runs it and wins her division. The event winds down as staff deflate the giant inflatable colon. 


Afterward, Roach reviews the history of ostomy surgery and modern pouches that enable mobility. She then examines attempts to avoid ostomies through artificial anal sphincters: The Acticon Neosphincter yielded high failure rates, and a magnetic device left the market. She tracks lab-grown biosphincter research at Wake Forest that showed animal success but never reached human trials. Adam Feinberg, a bioprinting researcher, explains why soft-tissue engineering and sphincter function remain technically difficult.

Chapter 13 Summary: “Out of Ink”

Feinberg, a bioprinting expert at Carnegie Mellon University, reviews decellularization, one idea to get around the problem of human immune systems rejecting transplanted tissue.  Decellularization involves removing the native cells from an organ but keeping its collagen, which forms the organ’s structure and doesn’t contain live cells. Recellularization is difficult because it requires repopulating the organ with new cells. Intact cells cannot reliably traverse capillary walls or reach correct niches. 


Feinberg introduces FRESH, his 3D-printing-based project, which strives to remedy this issue by reconstructing the structures of the collagen and cell tissues in tandem. A graduate student demonstrates by printing a collagen artery into a petri dish full of gel. A postdoctoral researcher shows printing runs that combine collagen and live liver tumor cells.


Roach watches heart cells beat in unison and learns why alignment and vascularization limit tissue production scale. A researcher prints millimeter-thick cardiac constructs that contract in a coordinated manner; alignment matters to prevent arrhythmias. Another reports that printed ventricles can survive in mice but currently lack valves; the lab has printed collagen valves and plans to integrate them. 


Feinberg recounts that early lab-grown bladders likely lacked true neuromuscular function, and he places whole-organ printing at an early stage of development. He estimates that full development is at least a decade away and will cost six figures for a heart. He notes that smaller, simpler targets will come first, highlighting the near-term focus on structures like hair follicles.

Chapter 14 Summary: “Shaft”

The chapter opens with the history of hair transplantation. In the 1950s, Norman Orentreich showed that transplanted follicles retain their original programming, a concept known as donor dominance. If they are harvested from a site on the body with thick hair growth, they will continue to grow even when implanted on balding scalps. Decades earlier, Shoji Okuda, a Japanese physician, was the first to document successful follicle transplants. He experimented widely with various donor sites, establishing the fact that follicles can be harvested and transplanted to and from literally anywhere on the body. 


This background frames Roach’s visit to San Diego surgeon Dr. Richard Chaffoo to donate follicles for research. Chaffoo describes the artistry of building a natural hairline and warns that repeated procedures can deplete donors. Guided by a nurse assistant, Chaffoo uses a motorized punch to harvest 12 follicular units from the back of Roach’s scalp for delivery to Stemson Therapeutics. At her request, they also transplant one two-hair unit to her left calf to see if it will take. An associate from Stemson collects the remaining follicles for lab dissection. 


Communication from the company then lapses, and nothing comes of the calf graft. Nearly a year later, Stemson invites the narrator to return, signaling a shift in the research approach.

Chapter 15 Summary: “Splitting Hairs”

The narrator returns to Stemson Therapeutics and meets Kevin D’Amour, the chief scientific officer, who outlines the lab's current focus: pluripotent stem cells. These are cells that three- or four-day-old embryos are made of, and their strength is that they are not yet programmed. In other words, they have the potential to become any type of human cell. 


Shinya Yamanaka, a researcher in Japan, had a breakthrough when he found a way to revert existing human cells to this pluripotent state. This was groundbreaking: It opened possibilities for treating and curing various diseases, as a patient can have their own cells harvested and converted to perform any function they want. Yamanaka won a Nobel Peace Prize for this discovery in 2012. 


Stemson applies this science to hair. They attempt to turn stem cells from donors like Roach into hair-producing cells. Lisa McDonnell shows Roach around the lab while she explains. Upon the author’s request, McDonnell pulls a vial of Roach’s cells to check on their progress. They turn out to have “petered out,” and there are far too few for robust experiments.


Roach asks to see human hair growing from the skin of mice—this is one of Stemson’s main research areas. D’Amour explains how the team adopted a new strategy since the last time Roach was there. To solve the issue of newly implanted hairs growing in all different directions, the new protocol involves threading a fine suture through droplets of dermal papilla cells and keratinocytes, which self-organize into a primitive follicle before implantation. 


In a procedure room, a biologist examines skin patches on immunodeficient nude mice, which receive a “slurry” of cells and then the follicle-on-a-thread implants; microscopy distinguishes incidental mouse hairs from organized human hairs from iPS-derived follicles. D’Amour projects clinical trials in roughly two years and flags a key unknown: whether new follicles inherit androgen sensitivity. This is a vital question, and the human trials needed to find an answer will be very expensive and time-consuming, as each patient’s individual cells first have to be harvested and converted to stem cells. 


One solution would be to use the already-prepared cells of someone else. These hypothetical cells, called “stealth” cells, would have to evade the host body’s immune system. This issue is the most pressing area of research in regenerative medicine. D’Amour contrasts this regulated path with the unregulated marketplace of “stem cell” fat injections that repurpose liposuction fractions without defined cell populations, causing injury and harm to consumers.

Chapters 12-15 Analysis

These chapters scrutinize the idea that Progress Is Not Linear, contrasting the slow reality of biomedical innovation with the streamlined narratives of press releases. The investigation into an artificial anal sphincter serves as a prime example of this disconnect. Roach describes a metaphorical junkyard of abandoned or ineffective technologies over the course of development, from clinically absent devices to the FDA-approved Acticon Neosphincter, which carries high rates of infection and functional failure. This pattern reveals that regulatory approval does not guarantee practical success. The narrative extends this critique to regenerative medicine, where a lab-grown “biosphincter” announced by the Wake Forest Institute is revealed to be far from clinical use. By tracing these stories from initial hype to their anticlimactic conclusions, the text establishes a recurring motif of the vast gap between a promising lab result and a viable human therapy. This culminates in the bioprinting lab, where Adam Feinberg contextualizes the field as being at a nascent stage, akin to the Wright brothers’ first flight. His analogy reframes groundbreaking science as the beginning of a long, incremental, and uncertain journey.


The shortcomings of engineered solutions reinforce another core theme: The Body Outperforms Its Replacements. Across diverse medical fields, attempts to replicate biological structures reveal the complexity of evolutionary design. The ostomy pouch, a simple but highly disruptive and intrusive external device, proves more reliable results for patients than a surgically implanted artificial sphincter, since the biological design of such a muscle is too intricate to successfully replicate. The high failure rates of these internal devices, stemming from infection and mechanical issues, underscore the difficulty of integrating foreign materials into the human body. Similarly, Adam Feinberg’s work in bioprinting demonstrates that replicating even basic biological properties is a monumental challenge. His team’s struggle to print collagen that can hold a suture highlights the superior mechanical properties of natural tissue. The larger challenge of vascularization—the body’s innate ability to grow capillaries—remains a fundamental obstacle to printing large-scale tissues. Even in hair transplantation, the principle of “donor dominance” affirms the body’s persistent biological programming, as transplanted follicles stubbornly retain their original characteristics, refusing to assimilate to their new sites.


Roach employs a narrative persona that combines journalistic rigor with empathetic participation. This approach serves to demystify medical science and destigmatize bodily difference. In the chapter on ostomies, she attends a 5K race for people with ostomies, which educates her from their perspective and aligns her viewpoint alongside those who experience the issues she discusses firsthand.  This participatory method helps to dismantle the stigma she is investigating, taking an up-close and personal approach to stigmatized concepts. Though Roach uses humorous asides and footnotes to make scientific information accessible, the narrative also uses emotional appeal to underpin its message. 


Beyond her own narrative voice, Roach meticulously characterizes the scientists and researchers she interacts with, portraying them as passionate and fallible individuals. This technique humanizes the scientific process, revealing it to be an enterprise fueled by distinct personalities and motivations. Adam Feinberg, for example, is portrayed as a confident leader whose lab is a collaborative ecosystem. By capturing individual voices and temperaments, the narrative illustrates that scientific progress depends as much on human qualities like resilience and creativity as it does on technical skill. 


This focus on character is particularly evident in the Stemson Therapeutics chapters, in which corporate pressure collides with human endeavor. Roach makes it clear that the company’s pivot to a new research strategy is at least partially due to monetary necessity, as the investors funding the project want to see results in a timely manner. With this example, Roach exposes a critical issue at the frontiers of medicine, in which the pressure to bring results and profit leads to a deprioritization of the patients’ needs and safety. Just as investors pressure researchers for timely and profit-oriented results, some clinicians and doctors choose a similar path. For example, Kevin D’Amour offers a condemnation of clinics that are “preying on people who are desperate” by performing unsafe surgeries just to profit (225). The text emphasizes that prioritizing profitability results in unsafe practice and harms the industry as a whole.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Unlock all 59 pages of this Study Guide

Get in-depth, chapter-by-chapter summaries and analysis from our literary experts.

  • Grasp challenging concepts with clear, comprehensive explanations
  • Revisit key plot points and ideas without rereading the book
  • Share impressive insights in classes and book clubs