67 pages 2-hour read

Rule of the Aurora King

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 2023

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

The Tension Between Inheritance and Self-Determination

In Rule of the Aurora King, Lor’s personal identity is inextricable from her family’s legacy, forcing her to confront whether she will repeat her grandmother’s destructive path or forge a new one. Lor’s struggle is to reclaim her birthright without succumbing to the world-breaking ambition that defined her infamous ancestor, the Heart Queen Serce. This fear is a constant undercurrent, as Lor recognizes the destructive potential of the power locked within her, a power that mirrors the historical accounts of her grandmother. The narrative reinforces this parallel through flashbacks to Serce’s life, which depict a queen whose desire for power ultimately led to ruin and continental war.


Serce first wanted only to defy the patriarchal expectations of her world, rejecting a forced marriage to the callous Atlas, but she soon became obsessed with power for its own sake, declaring to Rion, “I want my crown, and I will do anything to get it” (203). Lor, by contrast, is primarily motivated by the desire to protect her siblings, Tristan and Willow, and restore her family. The Heart Crown becomes a symbol of this double-edged inheritance. It represents not only her rightful place as queen but also the dangerous, world-altering magic she must learn to control, a power that both destroyed her family and offers their only hope for redemption.


This exploration of legacy is broadened through the parallel journey of Prince Nadir. He, too, grapples with a tainted inheritance, seeking to dismantle the tyrannical regime of his father, the Aurora King. Nadir’s secret rebellion and his desire to rule with a different set of values mirror Lor’s own quest to redefine her family’s name. Because Nadir’s father is the source of Lor’s trauma, Nadir must work to convince her that he is different. In working to earn her trust, he is also proving to himself that he can live by a different set of values than those that have defined his family. By placing these two characters on similar paths, the novel suggests that the burden of a difficult legacy is a shared experience among the heirs of Ouranos. Ultimately, the story posits that heritage does not dictate destiny. Instead, it presents a challenge to be overcome through deliberate choices that prioritize justice and love over the pursuit of power.

Power as an Obstacle to Empathy

Through the tyrannical rule of the Aurora King and the manipulative schemes of Prince Atlas, the novel demonstrates how unchecked power leads to cruelty, systemic oppression, and the destruction of empathy. This critique of absolute power serves as a cautionary tale for Lor, whose own quest to reclaim her legacy is fraught with the risk of becoming the very thing she seeks to destroy.


Lor’s experience in Nostraza, a prison where inmates are subjected to horrific abuse not only by fellow prisoners but also by the guards and warden meant to oversee them, serves as a microcosm of a world in which the powerful abuse and subjugate others. Lor recalls experiencing repeated sexual abuse at the hands of Nostraza’s warden, who knew that the prison gave her “no other fucking choice” (60) but to submit to his demands, highlighting a system designed to strip individuals of their humanity and agency. Lor and other prisoners experience sexual abuse and torture on a routine basis because of this system. The prisoners are rendered so powerless that their jailors fail to see them as human. This systemic disempowerment has lasting emotional consequences. When Nadir jokingly calls Lor “Inmate,” he inadvertently triggers this trauma, casting himself in the role of abusive warden and creating the mistrust that he must then work to overcome.


While the king’s power corrupts on a systemic level, Prince Atlas exemplifies a more personal and insidious form of moral decay. In the previous book, he used his royal status, charm, and promises of affection to deceive Lor, manipulating her as a pawn in his bid for power. Concerned only with his own power, he views other people as tools to be manipulated and used toward his own ends, eroding any capacity for genuine connection or empathy. This experience serves as a foundational trauma for Lor, informing her deep-seated mistrust of royalty. The historical narrative of Serce further reinforces this theme, portraying a queen whose ambition for supreme power led her to betray allies and ignite a devastating war. Serce’s attempted coup leads to the loss of her realm’s access to magic, symbolizing the moral and spiritual cost of pursuing absolute power. These examples of corrupt leadership force Lor to confront the dangers inherent in her own quest. As she seeks the power of the Heart Crown, she must navigate the temptation to use it for vengeance, constantly battling the risk of mirroring the tyrants she opposes.

The Fragility of Trust in a World of Deception

Having been repeatedly betrayed by those in authority, Lor’s journey is defined by her struggle to distinguish true allies from manipulative enemies, forcing her to question every promise and motive. This persistent theme of mistrust highlights the emotional cost of survival in a politically treacherous world, where vulnerability dangerous.


Lor’s inability to trust is a direct consequence of her past traumas. Her 12 years in the brutal Nostraza prison and the subsequent revelation of Prince Atlas’s elaborate deception have conditioned her to view all royalty with suspicion. This history forms the foundation of her relationship with Prince Nadir, whom she immediately identifies as an enemy. She resists his questions and threats, assuming his intentions are as self-serving as those of his father, the Aurora King. Lor’s initial assessment of Nadir as just another “pompous Fae asshole” (9) is a defense mechanism, a shield built from years of abuse and manipulation that makes it nearly impossible for her to accept help, even when she desperately needs it. Lor’s internal conflict is intensified by her position as Nadir’s captive. Without access to her magic and without other allies, she almost entirely in his power as the novel opens. She has little choice but to trust him, but experience has taught her that those who have power over her cannot be trusted to use it for her benefit. As it turns out, Nadir’s presence is the key to unlocking Lor’s own considerable power—a common romantasy trope that in this case serves a thematic function: By learning to trust Nadir, she gains the power to level the playing field between them.


The narrative complicates this theme by positioning Nadir as a clandestine ally whose actions are intentionally deceptive. His secret rebellion against his father forces him to maintain a hostile facade, treating Lor as a prisoner while secretly working to protect her and secure her family’s freedom. This dynamic places Lor in a constant state of uncertainty, compelling her to analyze his motives and weigh the risk of trusting the son of her greatest enemy. The slow, tentative development of their alliance underscores the difficulty of building trust when every powerful figure has a hidden agenda. The historical parallel between Serce and Rion, who forge a duplicitous alliance only to betray each other, further illustrates the landscape of shifting loyalties Lor must navigate. Ultimately, Lor must learn that survival in Ouranos requires more than just strength. It demands the difficult and emotionally costly work of discerning who is worthy of her trust in a world where deception is the most common currency of power.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Unlock every key theme and why it matters

Get in-depth breakdowns of the book’s main ideas and how they connect and evolve.

  • Explore how themes develop throughout the text
  • Connect themes to characters, events, and symbols
  • Support essays and discussions with thematic evidence