65 pages • 2-hour read
Alice MunroA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Content Warning: This section of the guide contains discussion of sexual violence and emotional abuse.
In “Runaway,” Flora the goat is a central symbol, embodying both stability and loss in Clara’s troubled life. From the outset, Flora represents Clara’s source of affection and comfort, which contrasts with Clark’s coldness and veiled hostility. His manipulation and passive aggression mark Clara’s relationship with him. He belittles and threatens her in ways that leave her increasingly powerless. Within this atmosphere of intimidation, Flora’s presence offers reassurance. Unlike Clark, the goat is affectionate, loyal, and incapable of cruelty. Clara relies on Flora as a grounding presence that softens the harshness of her existence. The goat becomes a surrogate companion and a symbol of the stability Clara needs to navigate her precarious domestic life.
By the time the story begins, however, Flora is missing. This absence immediately establishes a sense of unease. For Clara, the disappearance is more than a minor inconvenience. Flora’s absence symbolizes the dislocation that defines Clara’s life. For years, she has persuaded herself to endure Clark’s unpredictable temperament and cutting remarks, believing she can manage or adjust. Flora’s loss strips away the illusion that she can cope indefinitely. Without the goat, Clara recognizes how fragile her life has become and how little she has to hold onto. The missing animal embodies emptiness: a void that reflects the absence of love and reassurance in her marriage. At the same time, the goat’s flight carries a double meaning. While Clara dreads Flora’s absence, she also draws inspiration from it: If Flora can escape, perhaps Clara can, too. The goat’s disappearance symbolizes both Clara’s fear of losing what little solace she has and her dawning realization that she may need to break free from her confinement with Clark. Thus, Flora’s absence becomes both a haunting loss and a spark of possibility.
The symbolism deepens when both Clara and Flora return to the farm. Clara’s attempted escape from Clark fails, just as Flora eventually reappears after her mysterious absence. However, the way this return plays out is telling. Clark, not Clara, is the first to see Flora. Instead of rejoicing in her reappearance, he lies and conceals it, telling Clara that the goat is still missing. In doing so, he seizes control over both Flora and Clara, asserting his authority through deceit. To Clara, who later learns from Sylvia that Flora came back, the goat’s continued absence is no longer merely physical. It becomes sinister. She begins to fear that Clark has deliberately driven Flora away, or worse, killed her as punishment for Clara’s own attempted flight. What was once a source of comfort now becomes a chilling reminder of Clark’s control and potential for violence. Clara’s response to this fear further illuminates Flora’s symbolic role. She refuses to search for the goat’s remains, choosing instead to turn away from the possibility of a horrifying truth. In doing so, she broadens her pattern of self-delusion, convincing herself that she’s safe and that her life is manageable, even when the evidence suggests otherwise. Flora’s absence, then, symbolizes Clara’s situation. No longer just a symbol of affection and stability, the goat now represents the domestic threat that shadows Clara’s every decision.
In the trilogy of stories about Juliet (“Chance,” “Soon,” and “Silence”), the motif of classical studies is a powerful symbol of Juliet’s intelligence, ambition, and eventual isolation. From the outset, Juliet’s commitment to the classics marks her as a figure of defiance. At college, she studies Greek and Latin despite repeated warnings from professors that her work won’t be taken seriously because she’s a woman. Rather than deterring her, this inspires Juliet to persist, driven by her fascination with the ancient world and her determination to establish herself as an intellectual. This education becomes the foundation of her identity as a teacher and scholar, proof of her ability to resist social expectations and follow her desires. However, the story frames classical studies as more than a measure of Juliet’s intellect: They symbolize her misplaced naivete. Knowledge of Greek authors doesn’t equip her to navigate the complexities of adult life. During her first encounter with Eric, for instance, Juliet acutely feels her immaturity and attempts to compensate by displaying her classical learning, explaining to him the myths behind the constellations. Nevertheless, her education doesn’t protect her from vulnerability or youthful insecurity. Here, the classics embody the gap between learning and maturity, demonstrating that scholarship alone can’t prepare Juliet for the challenges of intimacy and human connection.
Beyond marking Juliet’s youthful defiance and naivete, classical studies shape her understanding of fate and agency. In the Greek world she admires, human lives are deeply entangled with destiny. Characters in epics and tragedies often strive to control their futures but discover that divine will has already sealed their fates. Juliet, steeped in these stories, interprets her own life through a similar lens. Her pursuit of romance with Eric feels imbued with inevitability, as though their meeting on the train in “Chance” was a matter of destiny rather than circumstance. The classics thus symbolize the tension in Juliet’s life between agency and resignation. On one hand, her mastery of classical literature reflects her determination to defy social conventions and assert independence. On the other hand, her belief in fate reflects her susceptibility to surrender, to accept events as inevitable rather than shaped by her own choices. This dual symbolism helps explain Juliet’s oscillation between moments of bold assertion and periods of passive acceptance. Like a tragic heroine, she seeks control yet often finds herself submitting to what feels preordained.
As the trilogy progresses, the presence and absence of classical studies signal Juliet’s changing circumstances. In “Soon,” where she returns home with her infant daughter, the classics have almost disappeared from her life. Motherhood occupies her time and energy, leaving no room for the subjects that once defined her. This absence symbolizes her altered identity. The erasure of the classics reflects her sense of displacement: Domestic obligations have eclipsed her studies, once central in her life. In “Silence,” Juliet returns to classical studies, but in a radically different context. After Penelope disappears from her life, Juliet reacquaints herself with the world of Greek texts, working toward her thesis and rediscovering forgotten authors. Her studies now represent her attempt to reassert agency in a life shattered by loss. The stories of fate, exile, and return resonate with her own experience, offering a framework for making sense of Penelope’s abandonment.
Robin’s relationship to the green dress is central to the symbolic structure of “Tricks.” The dress first appears at the opening of her story, when Robin worries anxiously about whether it’ll be ready in time. This anxiety reflects more than a simple concern over clothing. Robin wore the green dress the year before when she met Daniel, and he has asked her to appear to him exactly as she did before. To Robin, then, the readiness of the dress symbolizes her ability to fulfill his expectations. Her future, as she imagines it, depends on her capacity to please him. Every detail, down to the specific dress she wore, must be correct if she’s to secure his love. The dress thus becomes a potent symbol of her adherence to Daniel’s instructions and her longing to ensure that their reunion will blossom into romance. Her anxiety at the story’s outset reflects her anxiety over her future: The question of whether the dress will be ready is also the question of whether she’ll be able to transform this relationship into something lasting.
When Robin goes to meet Daniel, however, the reunion doesn’t unfold as she expects. The man who answers the door looks exactly like Daniel but doesn’t recognize her. She’s turned away in confusion, later realizing that this was Daniel’s twin. Her carefully laid hopes are shattered in an instant, and the symbolic weight of the dress assumes a new dimension. Afterward, Robin searches desperately for an explanation, a way to account for why her meeting failed. The green dress becomes central to this search. Because the dress she wore wasn’t the same one she wore the previous year, Robin convinces herself that this minor difference may have caused the rejection. She imagines that Daniel (or the man she thought was Daniel) noticed the discrepancy and was disappointed. The dress shifts from being a symbol of obedience and hope to a symbol of failure and self-blame. Not realizing that Daniel has a twin, which led to an accident of mistaken identity, she interprets her humiliation as a product of her own inadequacy, which the difference between the two dresses represents.
Robin’s fixation on the dress reveals the depth of her desire to impose order on her disappointment. Facing an inexplicable rejection, she clings to the idea that something tangible (the substitution of one dress for another) explains what happened. This allows her to direct her pain inward, to blame herself rather than confront the randomness of fate. The green dress, then, becomes a symbolic screen onto which she projects her yearning for control in a situation defined by chance. It’s easier for her to imagine that she failed in following Daniel’s rules than to accept that her entire vision of the future has collapsed through no fault of her own. In this way, the dress symbolizes both her desperation to rationalize her misfortune and the impossibility of doing so.



Unlock the meaning behind every key symbol & motif
See how recurring imagery, objects, and ideas shape the narrative.