69 pages • 2-hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more. For select classroom titles, we also provide Teaching Guides with discussion and quiz questions to prompt student engagement.
Carson develops a new extension of her argument in Chapter 11, positing that humans are exposed to a huge number of chemicals on a daily basis, not simply those associated with agricultural practices. Over time, these “innumerable small-scale exposures” to chemicals makes it so that “probably no person is immune to contact with this spreading contamination” (173). Carson suggests that the widespread use of chemicals has infiltrated food and household products in addition to the insecticides and pesticides she has documented in early sections of the book. Carson cites a study by the United States Public Health Service where every meal that was tested “contained DDT” (178).
While many people argue that the government should limit exposure to harmful chemicals, Carson describes how difficult it is to effectively regulate the use of these chemicals. She cautions that a “zero tolerance on paper is of little value” (183). Carson argues for a “large-scale conversion” (184) to alternative methods if humans want to avoid deathly consequences from chemical exposure.
Carson articulates more clearly the impacts of humans’ long-term exposure to chemicals by demonstrating that there are numerous concerning health effects related to chemicals in the environment. This “never-ending stream of chemicals” (188) can cause delayed effects through absorption over a lifetime. Like nature, the human body contains complex relationships which means many of the impacts of these chemicals can remain relatively undetected for a long time.
The ways that chemicals are stored in the body can be part of the reason that the impacts can remain hidden. Insecticides which are fat-soluble “become stored in individual cells, where they are in position to interfere with the most vital and necessary functions of oxidation and energy production” (191). Other types of chemicals impact the nervous system, causing symptoms like “insomnia, nervous tension, and feelings of acute anxiety” (193), as well as tremors. In addition, because some chemicals interact with one another when they are in the same environment, it is almost impossible to predict how a human body will process the different chemicals it has been introduced to.
In Chapter 13 Carson turns her focus to the inner workings of the human body. More specifically, she looks at the ways the “minute structures within […] cells” and “the ultimate reactions of molecules” (199) are affected by chemical exposure. Carson argues that the process of transforming matter into energy within cells can be stopped by certain types of common insecticides and pesticides. The “cycle of oxidation” can come to a “halt” (204) when enzymes are weakened. This is also related to diminished reproductive capacity within germ cells. These kinds of mutations and problems “may lead to disease in the individual […] or they may make their effects felt in future generations” (208). Carson closes the chapter with a strict warning that because chemical manufacturers do not have to test for the genetic effects of their compounds, there is little being done to “reduce this threat” (216).
Humans are responsible for the creation of a number of cancer-causing compounds, called carcinogens in the medical field. Against these “man had no protection, for even as his biological heritage has evolved slowly, so it adapts slowly to new conditions” (220). Humans took a long time to understand the ways that cancer is caused and impacts the body. Earlier in the 20th century, cancer was considered “a rarity” (221); at the time of Carson’s text, the “American Cancer Society estimate[d] that 45,000,000 Americans now living [would] eventually develop cancer” (221). Most of the chemicals used as insecticides or pesticides can be traced to cancer. Arsenic, DDT, and herbicides IPC and CIPC are all scientifically proven to be carcinogens, wreaking havoc on the human body.
Carson tracks how “a substance that is not a carcinogen in the ordinary sense may disturb the normal functioning of […] the body in such a way that malignancy results” (235). In particular, this seems to occur with cancers of the reproductive system which are linked to “disturbances of the balance of sex hormones” (235). In addition, there may be connections between “physical and […] chemical agent[s]” (238).
Throughout human history, science has brought infectious disease under control, yet humans have failed to stop cancer. In Carson’s opinion, this is because there needs to be a two-fold approach that addresses both therapeutic measures that cure the patient as well as “reducing the foci of infection” (241). Carson reminds the reader that “man has put the vast majority of carcinogens into the environment, and he can, if he wishes, eliminate many of them” (242).
In these chapters, Carson’s argument shifts from a focus on the environment to a focus on the impact that chemical compounds can have on human lives and bodies. This move makes sense at this progression in Carson’s series of essays, which were originally published one by one in The New Yorker. In her intent to convince the public of the severity of the crisis of chemical usage in our environment, Carson had to craft a series of pieces that led the reader to feel more and more urgency. By the end of Chapter 13, it is difficult not to feel like there is an immediate crisis and threat to humanity as the result of widespread use of insecticides and pesticides. In earlier sections, Carson articulates the impact of these chemical compounds on the agriculture sector and some specific locations; as she moves into these later arguments, she demands that every person in contact with any of these chemicals become more invested in ending their exposure.
Over and over, Carson suggests that there are sensible alternatives to the ways that people have been approaching controlling plants and animals. Her insistence that it is indeed possible to end the use (or curb the use) of dangerous chemical compounds is in direct defiance to the large corporations and government interests who make the decisions to use these methods of insect and weed control. By asserting that it is in the public interest to challenge these chemical manufacturers and politicians, Carson is able to move her audience towards real action.



Unlock all 69 pages of this Study Guide
Get in-depth, chapter-by-chapter summaries and analysis from our literary experts.