49 pages 1-hour read

The Art Forger

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 2012

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

Originality and Cultural Prestige as Sources of Value in Art

One of the central themes of The Art Forger is the question of what makes a work of art original and how much of its value depends on its provenance. Concerns about originality in art are always tied to capitalistic determinations of value. Any work of art can be reproduced a theoretically infinite number of times—whether by hand, using artisanal techniques as Claire does, or by industrial, mechanized processes—but there can only ever be one original. This scarcity, combined with the cultural prestige of the specific work, equates to monetary value.


In the novel, Claire earns money by painting reproductions of famous artworks for an online store, reproductions.com. Though not regarded as original, her work commands a far higher price than the prints made by machines. The source of this higher value is scarcity. There are few people with Claire’s skills, and her work takes time. Reproductions of this kind are therefore harder to come by than mechanized prints, which can be turned out by the hundreds. Claire’s hard-earned skill allows her to earn a living even as it forces her to spend her time doing work that does not express her own vision.


The second component of an artwork’s value is its cultural prestige, which is much more subjective and harder to define. Early on, Claire is frustrated that her own original paintings go unsold while reproductions of famous names sell reliably. She has technical skill on par with some of the most famous artists of all time, but this technical skill is not enough to make her a valued artist in her own right. The era in which artists were valued primarily for their technical skill ended with the advent of photography, if not before. The value of art in the modern world derives in large part from the perception of originality in its ideas, style, and methods. In this context, Claire’s adherence to classical techniques of representational realism already puts her at a disadvantage in accumulating cultural prestige, and her gender in a male-dominated art world disadvantages her further.


The ease with which experts throughout the book are deceived points to the subjective nature of judgments about art. When Markel asks Claire to forge a work by Edgar Degas, she is initially offended, despite regularly making Degas reproductions. In her view, a reproduction is ethically distinct from a forgery in that it does not infringe on the original work’s claim to originality. However, as Claire examines the painting she has been asked to forge, she begins to believe that the “original”—praised for over a century as a demonstration of Degas’s mastery—is in fact a somewhat clumsy fake. Just as this copy has been misperceived as original, Claire’s own original work is mislabeled as a copy. When she seeks to prove that she is the artist behind 4D, she is asked to reproduce the work in front of witnesses. The work is then submitted to a panel of experts, who deem it a copy of Isaac Cullion’s original work. These events suggest that originality is a cultural construct subject to the biases of those in authority. The very fact that After the Bath hangs in the prestigious Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum leads people to perceive it as original, just as Isaac Cullion’s status as a famous male artist makes it easier for the experts to trust his claims over those of an unknown woman.


Claire’s journey reflects her own changing views of this theme. At first, she’s motivated by the promise of a show and recognition; essentially trading her integrity for chance at success. But as she works on the forgery and investigates the “original,” she becomes deeply uneasy. She is forced to re-examine what art means to her, what she wants to be, and whether her talent merits recognition without the deception. The crime of forgery becomes not only a legal/moral issue but an aesthetic and existential one. Ultimately Claire comes out on top; the process of forgery helps her refine her own artistic skill and develop her work for the Markel G show. When she is finally free of the two After the Bath paintings, she feels that the weight of many years of self-doubt has been lifted from her. When Claire finally has her own show at the end of the book, though, she still questions whether her recognition is due to her actual talent, or due to the notoriety she has gained from weathering multiple scandals. Her immersion in questions of originality has led her to recognize that much of the value of an artwork resides in the story behind it.

The Malleability of Image and Reputation in the Art World

Claire’s story is a study in how an artist’s self-worth is tied not only to the art they produce, but to the recognition they gain for it. Fame doesn’t come solely from being a good painter; the artist must also build and maintain connections in the volatile art world. Often, the artist is at odds with this world, as exemplified through the contrast between Claire’s modest personal life and the moneyed world of the artistic elite, comprised of gallerists, curators, wealthy collectors, and a relatively tiny coterie of famous artists.


As the novel begins, Claire is aware of her talent yet stuck outside the “inner circle.” Her relationship with Issac Cullion has colored her self-perception, as he is older, more successful, and holds the attention of the art world that she craves. This comes to a head when he reaches a new level of success by taking credit for a painting that she produced. Although at first Claire is proud that her work is being noticed, she begins to resent that it isn’t noticed as hers. When she tries to confront this lie publicly, Issac’s greater notoriety works in his favor. Despite her version of 4D being very clearly by the same artist, her claim is rejected. It becomes clear as the novel progresses that many of the experts knew the painting was Claire’s, but kept silent because admitting Isaac’s deception would have been financially ruinous for many people and would have damaged MoMA’s reputation.


When Markel offers Claire the opportunity to forge a Degas, he baits her by playing to her ambition, promising a solo show at his elite gallery. Claire craves validation, so she quickly agrees, initially rationalizing that she will make some much-needed money and finally be seen for her talent as a real artist. Markel’s claim that he will return the “real” Degas to the museum gives Claire plausible deniability, allowing her to convince herself that she is not actually doing anything wrong.


Claire begins the project thinking of it as a job, not much different from the one she regularly performs for reproductions.com. Her work quickly becomes an obsession and an internal reckoning with her own past. As she studies famous forgers of the past and employs their techniques, she begins to wonder if she is really that different from them after all.


Meanwhile, the art world around her is portrayed as precarious and competitive. The high-stakes environment puts pressure on Claire’s ambition. She will inevitably gain success from the Markel G show, but if her forgery is discovered, it will all be for naught. This dynamic is reflected in her worry over her relationship with Markel; even if her real fraud is not discovered, if it is known that she and Markel are romantically involved the art world may see her as undeserving, regardless of her talent.


Toward the end of the novel, after a brief whirlwind of being implicated in the crime, Claire emerges with new visibility. She is recognized; her work sells. But she is left wondering if it is because she is a great artist, or because her name is notable due to its connection with several scandals. After all, the Markel G show only happened because the public demanded it after the forgery made worldwide headlines. By the novel’s closing, it doesn’t appear to matter. Claire is a success, her paintings are being battled over in auction, and, perhaps most importantly, she has regained the respect of the people who questioned her after the 4D controversy.

Moral Compromise as a Consequence of Ambition

In The Art Forger, characters cross ethical lines, justify deception, and struggle with the consequences of their choices. The novel does not present a simple good versus evil dichotomy; instead, it asks how far one will go for art, ambition, love, and redemption.


At the novel’s outset, Claire’s conscientiousness is juxtaposed against her reputation in the art world. She sees herself as an ethical person and strives to make ethical choices, but her work reproducing classic artworks renders her suspect in the eyes of many art world professionals, and her unsuccessful attempt to reclaim credit for her own work has damaged her reputation further. Reproducing art for a living is legal, but it toes the line between fraud and authenticity. She is in fact doing the exact same work as a forger, but because her works are openly sold as reproductions, they are legally above board. The book does not delve deeper into the question of what happens to these works after they are sold. If a buyer misrepresents one of Claire’s works as an original, she could be accused of abetting fraud.


The moral stakes escalate when she is asked to forge for real. Claire’s internal monologue reveals her wrestling with this decision, justifying her unethical choice out of financial desperation and frustrated ambition. Markel offers her a solo show—an opportunity that she has long desired and believes she deserves. Despite her misgivings, she decides very quickly to pursue the job. Markel remarks that he always knew she would take it, as he knows what she is really like. With this statement, he claims authority over her identity. His economic power gives him this authority: In his view, knowing a person’s financial need is tantamount to knowing who they are, because people are only as ethical as they can afford to be.


When the stolen painting itself is revealed to be a forgery, the novel becomes a meditation on how deception is baked into the system in the world of art collecting. Teams of experts claim to be able to tell a real Degas from a fake, but this system is shown to be flawed when they determine Claire’s work to be real despite it actually being a forgery of a forgery. Claire mentions that her teachers have told her that the well-known forgeries are the unsuccessful ones: “[T]he bad forgeries have been discovered because the good ones are hanging on museum walls” (129). Once a painting is accepted as authentic, institutions and collectors have a financial and reputational incentive to maintain this perception.


Claire’s volunteer teaching in a juvenile detention center also brings moral dimension; she is trying to give back to people less privileged than herself, and at the same time to redeem her self-image. Claire explicitly recognizes that her privilege as a middle-class white woman insulates her from the punishment these boys face, even as she is actively committing crimes. She is free to come and go from the detention center as she pleases despite possibly being complicit in a much greater crime that any of the boys have ever committed.


In the end, although Claire perhaps escapes major legal consequence, the damage is done: Trust is broken, her identity is changed, and she must live with the ambiguity of her achievement. The novel doesn’t give clean moral closure, even in the dizzying success of her show, Claire wonders if she really deserves to be there. She decides to cut Markel out of her life completely as a moral penance, an ironic reflection of her own rejection and isolation by Issac after he could not face that his best work was a fraud.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Unlock every key theme and why it matters

Get in-depth breakdowns of the book’s main ideas and how they connect and evolve.

  • Explore how themes develop throughout the text
  • Connect themes to characters, events, and symbols
  • Support essays and discussions with thematic evidence