18 pages 36-minute read

The Blind Men and the Elephant

Fiction | Poem | Adult | Published in 1872

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

The Limits of Understanding

As a parable, the poem explores the nature of understanding, appreciating its ambition but acknowledging its limits.


The blind men in the poem are wise, given to analysis rather than emotion, curious, and confident in their ability to divine certainty and truth through the rigorous and careful application of observation. The poet does not mock these blind men. The premise of the poem is not to dismiss the attempts to perceive a reliable and verifiable truth in a world full of confusing and often contradictory phenomena. Each blind man is given the opportunity to expound of his particular insight—no observation is challenged in the poem, and no one wise man is exposed as a fool. Each blind man and each assertion is allowed its moment; each is allowed to stand.


Saxe was writing in an era that witnessed an explosion in the sciences as a culture began to appreciate the rewards of investigation and observation. Saxe’s insight, however, is that given such a plethora of exemplary and earnest exchange of ideas, it is evident that human understanding, while impressive in its reach and its breadth, is limited. No one wise man here is wise enough, and even assembling all of their observations into a single reality still falls short of the goal of absolute understanding. The elephant is never entirely defined; the elephant sings free of the well-intentioned efforts to understand it. Understanding, then, is necessarily an expression of subjectivity, each person only as insightful as their particular blindness will allow. Saxe’s cautionary tone advises respecting the goal of human understanding but accepting that as an absolute, human understanding is literally only human.

The Importance of Religious Tolerance

Because the idea of accepting a single perception of God led to millennia of conflict, confrontations, and has sanctioned lengthy wars, Saxe argues the importance of embracing all perceptions of God. These perceptions are neither right nor wrong because, as the poet concludes, “not one of them has seen” (Line 27) this God.


Thus, humanity’s perceptions of God should create a harmony of intention. Whatever the denomination, humanity is restless with the world as it is and anxious over a world given to and governed by happenstance. The collective need to define a God reflects the collective need for meaning and purpose. To isolate any perception as wrong is to pretend to understand something that humanity cannot. The poem allows each fragment of insight—the tusk, the knees, the trunk, the tail, the ears, the huge sides of the elephant—to maintain the integrity of its assertion, each in its way right, each in its way wrong. The “stiff and strong” (Line 23) dispute among the wisemen is the problem—not how entirely they miss the elephant. It is the poet who advises the better course is not to dispute but to listen, to exchange theories, to embrace that the complexity of the idea of God can accommodate a variety of insights and realities.

The Reality of God

Even though all six blind men fail to embrace the totality of the animal, the animal is nevertheless there. The blind men are wise, but they do not have the intellectual reach, the imaginative courage, or the spiritual sensitivity to understand a God that must remain inscrutable. However, the poet stands apart from the gathering of wisemen and endows the enterprise with a core reality: The elephant is there, but we cannot understand it completely.


The poem is addressed to a culture just beginning to openly question the reality of a Christian God given the emerging data from the sciences, particularly geology and biology. The poem rejects as fanaticism any idea that, because we question God, it must not exist. The energy of the blind wisemen’s endeavor, doomed as it is to come up against the limits of what they can confirm, is heroic exactly because it is doomed. Imagine if all the references to the elephant in the poem were replaced with the pronoun “it.” Then, the reader would share the blind men’s confusion. The reader would inevitably determine that pursuit of such wisdom is futile. However, the poet tells us “it” is an elephant—it is there; it is real; but it is just beyond the scope of our understanding. The poet is encouraging his audience to stay with the efforts to define what gives life its purpose, even if it eludes perfect understanding.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Unlock every key theme and why it matters

Get in-depth breakdowns of the book’s main ideas and how they connect and evolve.

  • Explore how themes develop throughout the text
  • Connect themes to characters, events, and symbols
  • Support essays and discussions with thematic evidence