65 pages • 2-hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Content Warning: This section of the guide includes discussion of death.
Part 1 opens with Klement Gottwald, the first Communist president of Czechoslovakia, standing triumphantly on a balcony in Prague. He is flanked by friends and political allies, including a man named Vladimir Clementis, who places his own hat on Gottwald’s head. Later that day, Clementis will be executed, and his image will be erased from all photographs of the ceremony. The hat, however, will remain. Even though the image of Clements next to Gottwald has been seen by many people, the communist regime that governs Czechoslovakia in 1971 has no compunction about erasing someone from history.
The narrator says that the first rule of living in such a society is to keep no records. This rule is being broken by Mirek, who believes that memories are important. To remember something, Mirek believes, is an act of rebellion against the regime. He records meetings and conversations in his diary. When he suffers an accident at work, Mirek worries that his records might hurt those around him. To protect his friends and family, he decides to destroy his “compromising papers.” First, however, he must meet a woman named Zdena. He ignores the protests of his teenage son and drives to the appointment with an injured arm.
Many years earlier, Mirek and Zdena had an affair. His memories of the affair have begun to fade, however. He no longer feels as though he can trust these memories. Two specific memories stick out to Mirek. In the first, he remembers being suspicious when Zdena cried following the death of a Soviet leader named Masturbov. In the second, Mirek remembers Zdena telling him directly that she was not “satisfied with his lovemaking” (6). She claimed that he made love like an intellectual. Mirek does not really understand her meaning, but the accusation of being an intellectual in that era was bad enough.
As Mirek makes his way to Zdena’s apartment, he realizes that he is being followed. He goes into a repair shop outside of Prague. His friend, who works in the repair shop, is reluctant to work on Mirek’s car, however, as Mirek has been declared a persona non grata due to recent unwanted publicity. One of the men who has been following Mirek arrives. He looks into the hood of Mirek’s car; he stays silent as Mirek’s friend quizzes him. Evidently, the friend is not a fan of the totalitarian regime that has taken hold in Czechoslovakia.
The regime in Czechoslovakia has committed many atrocities, though they are soon forgotten due to the rapid rate at which the atrocities occur. The communists came to power in 1948 via a military coup. At the time, local intellectuals were hopeful. The communists had a vision for a utopic version of Czechoslovakia; this vision allowed them to defeat their rivals. Not everyone shared the vision, however, and opponents of the regime were declared enemies. Many people were imprisoned. Eventually, the intellectuals lost faith in the regime. The vision for a utopia in Czechoslovakia turned into an authoritarian nightmare.
Leaving his mechanic friend behind, Mirek resumes his journey to Zdena. He notices that he is being followed again, and he suddenly regrets that he did not hide his incriminating papers. Mirek senses that his own story may be ending soon. He remembers when he ended the relationship with Zdena. Afterward, he married an attractive woman who then died. His status as a widower seemed to make him more attractive to women. Since he is a scientist, Mirek felt himself to be removed from the interference of the state. When he “refused to renounce his convictions” (14) and to co-operate with the Soviets, however, he lost his job.
Mirek was unrepentant. He fell in love with the tragedy of his own story. He sees his destiny almost as something separate to his self: He also sees his life like a work of art, with Mirek himself as the artist, perfecting his project. To perfect this life, however, Mirek believes that Zdena must be erased from his story. Zdena presents a problem for Mirek’s idea of his life as a work of art, partly due to her sympathy for the Soviets. More of an issue, Mirek concedes, is that Zdena is “ugly.” In Mirek’s mind, his attachment to such an ugly woman is an issue as it may hinder relationships with other, more attractive women. Mirek believes that beautiful women will be put off if they know that he had an affair with an ugly woman. Zdena often discusses her affair with Mirek openly, meaning that Mirek feels a need to change his past to suit his current needs.
Mirek began his affair with Zdena because she was a member of the Communist Party. He told his friends that their affair would help him achieve a promotion. This is not true, the narrator interjects. Rather, Mirek did not believe that a more attractive woman would be interested in him. Mirek “clearly” remembers a time shortly after Zdena denounced his intellectual lovemaking. He had tried to impress her in bed but failed.
The narrator states that the Prague Spring took place in 1968. This brief period of liberalization in the country ended on August 21, when the Soviets sent troops into Bohemia to put down the uprising. This—and many other episodes—have been deliberately forgotten by society to preserve the ideal of the communist vision, which is an example of how the Soviets revise history. Mirek, like many of the intellectuals, is a victim of this revision.
Mirek arrives at Zdena’s apartment. He still feels that he is being followed. Zdena is wary of Mirek’s arrival, but she understands that he is in trouble. She suggests that he apologize to the authorities and plead for mercy. Mirek understands this, but he does not want to go on television to renounce the statements that he made against communism. He believes that the story of his life needs a better resolution. Mirek suspects that Zdena is acting strangely because she is in league with the authorities. The narrator dismisses Mirek’s paranoia, however, and states that Zdena is not working for the state. Mirek suddenly has a realization: Zdena wants him to save himself. He wonders whether he has always been misinterpreting Zdena’s intentions. Even her loyalty to the party, he wonders, might have been for his benefit.
Mirek reveals the purpose of his visit: He asks Zdena for the love letters he sent to her. Zdena has recently read the letters again. The “explosion of feelings” (23) in Mirek’s letters surprised her. Mirek is displeased. He assures himself that this supposed emotion was caused by his own desperate efforts to convince himself that he was in love with Zdena. Yet Zdena suggests that there are many ideas and sentiments from Mirek’s past that he would no longer like to be associated with. He was a very different person back then, Zdena admits. Mirek, however, is focused solely on retrieving the letters to erase this history of himself. Zdena asks what he will do with the letters. Mirek lies, saying that he wants to read them to show himself the truth of the past.
Zdena is not tricked by Mirek’s lies. When she refuses to hand over the letters, Mirek hates the “unbearable” power she has over him. He thinks about attacking her and taking the letters. Mirek tells Zdena that he was followed to her apartment. Zdena does not believe him, which convinces Mirek that she must be working with the authorities. They bid farewell to one another. Mirek never wants to see Zdena again. Privately, Zdena is worried by Mirek’s talk of being followed. She knows that she cannot alter Mirek’s fate.
On his return home, Mirek manages to evade his followers. When he is alone, he slows down and observes the world around him. He wonders to himself why he went to see Zdena when he could have been burning his own diaries and documents instead. Mirek knows that his actions were not rational. He sought to take charge of his past by destroying the love letters to Zdena. While waiting for a train to pass, he sees a village in the distance that reminds him of the summer vacation when he first met Zdena. He knows he truly loved her then, back when they were both idealistic young communists. Mirek even informed on other people to improve his standing in the Party. He finally concedes that he is not better than the Party. He, too, wants to change history to make himself look better. The narrator suggests that this is the purpose of power: to change the past.
Mirek’s guilty thoughts soon vanish. He continues his journey, pushing the memories from his mind. He resumes his mission to give his story the perfect ending. When he returns home, the secret police are waiting for him. His son is also waiting for him; his son is upset and always thought that Mirek’s plan was absurd. The police have searched the apartment and have found Mirek’s papers. One officer tells him that these papers will incriminate many people. This does not upset Mirek, nor does the threat of prison. This may be the best ending for his story, as the news of his sentence will stay in the public consciousness for longer than if he were simply erased or if he fled the country. Mirek romanticizes the idea of himself as an awkward “stain” on the vision of a communist utopia. He is sentenced to six years in prison; Mirek’s son is sentenced to two years in prison; 10 of Mirek’s friends are also sent to prison based on the evidence in Mirek’s papers.
The opening scene of The Book of Laughter and Forgetting is set on a balcony in February 1948. The scene condenses a political century into one emblematic act: Clementis, solicitous, sets his fur hat on the bareheaded Gottwald, and propaganda circulates the image, so that “every child knew that photograph” (3). The image played a formative role in the childhood of many people in Czechoslovakia. Four years later, Clementis is hanged, and the same government retouches the photograph to make it seem like Gottwald was alone on the balcony. Yet the hat remains: The narrator writes that “nothing remains of Clementis but the fur hat on Gottwald’s head” (4). This overlooked detail testifies to what the government could not fully control, symbolizing the limits of censorship and erasure. The narrator uses this incident to comment on the novel’s theme of The Politics of Memory and Erasure, saying that “the struggle of man against power is the struggle of memory against forgetting” (4). While the doctored photograph shows erasure at work, the leftover hat is evidence that erasure always leaves residues that accrue weight and meaning. Since the state can dictate what is seen but not what is remembered, the novel locates political resistance in enduring memories.
Mirek’s errand across Prague translates this political idea into psychological terms. He wants to retrieve his old letters to Zdena and expunge her from his past not because he never loved her but because she is “ugly” and he fears the social implications of their association. The narrator directly links his vanity to the way the state disappeared Clementis: Mirek “wanted to efface [Zdena] from the photograph of his life […] as the party propaganda section had made Clementis disappear. […] Mirek rewrote history just like the Communist Party” (30). This recognition collapses the distance between individual vanity and authoritarian power, since they both desire to revise, erase, or sanitize the past. Mirek’s subsequent arrest scene underscores this similarity, since Mirek’s small act of censorship is mirrored in the state’s bigger project of censoring everyone’s existence. Mirek becomes a victim to the same forces he has just recognized within himself. He is both victim and practitioner of erasure, which is why his capture is poignant: It reveals that the human impulse to forget a messy past exists on the same continuum as authoritarian repression.
At the end, Mirek imagines himself as “a stain” on the idyllic world that the government is trying to create. He believes that his dissent will persist as an unerasable blot, akin to Clementis’s hat. The image is double-edged. On one hand, the stain demonstrates resistance and difference since a political idyll demands unanimity. On the other hand, the image is also self-serving since Mirek is “drawn irresistibly” to the idea of martyrdom, seeing prison as “a splendidly illuminated scene of history” (33). The comparison with Clementis’s hat clarifies the distinction. The hat is an unintended remnant that indicts the image by surviving it; Mirek’s “stain” is a willed refusal that indicts the idyll by marring it. Both are residues that memory can grip when official narratives slip from reach, yet they differ in agency. Part 1 thus anchors the novel’s central claim that memory can persist and escape the state’s control. The hat shows how artifacts can outlive state manipulation, while the stain shows the power of dissidence.



Unlock all 65 pages of this Study Guide
Get in-depth, chapter-by-chapter summaries and analysis from our literary experts.