65 pages • 2-hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Content Warning: This section of the guide includes discussion of death, physical abuse, and rape.
In France, two young American students are studying abroad. Madame Raphael, their teacher, asks them to prepare a report about Rhinoceros, an absurdist 1959 play by Eugène Ionesco. The two girls—named Michelle and Gabrielle—are perplexed by the play, particularly the way in which the characters are turned into the titular animals. Michelle suggests that these rhinoceroses symbolize something, so they must decode this symbolism. Gabrielle suggests that the horns of the rhinoceroses might be phallic symbols, but Michelle cannot understand why the female characters would also change into rhinoceroses if this were true. The girls are pleased when Michelle decides that the rhinoceroses are simply for “comic effect.” They laugh with delight at figuring out the play.
The narrator thinks about laughter, citing a passage from Parole de femme by Annie Leclerc. The passage presents laughter as sensual, which the narrator suggests is a contrast to male expressions of sexuality. The narrator suggests that the violent, fleeting nature of male sexuality is contrasted with the gentle sensuality of female sexuality, with Leclerc valorizing the latter. Everything, according to Leclerc, is a sensual experience that can provide pleasure. Since laughter is such a pleasant experience, Leclerc suggests, people should not need a reason to laugh. This sentiment has been co-opted, the narrator notes, and turned into cliché. Michelle and Gabrielle laugh together as they prepare their oral report. They are sure that Madame Raphael will be impressed.
The narrator tells a story about his experiences in 1968 in Bohemia. He was ostracized, having lost his job and his friends. The only person who would speak to a dissident like him was a woman named R. She was willing to help the narrator, despite the threat of the secret police who wanted to “starve” dissidents. R. wrote for a magazine targeted at young people. The narrator needed a job, so R. offered him the position of horoscope writer under an anonymous byline. She said she would lie to her employers, claiming that the writer was actually a respected scientist with an interest in astrology and was too embarrassed to write under his real name. The narrator was not paid much, but the editor-in-chief was so impressed by his work that he offered the narrator a commission to write a personal horoscope. He insisted that the commission must remain private, however. The narrator was paid well, and he used information from R. about the editor’s flaws to create a personalized horoscope. The message of the horoscope was that the editor must change his life if he was to avoid a dark future. Later, R. reported that the horoscope was a success. The editor changed, but he also feared a dark future filled with “suffering.”
The narrator thinks about the nature of angels and devils. He challenges the idea of angels as benevolent soldiers of God, instead suggesting that their function is to protect God’s creations. The devil exists, the narrator says, to challenge these creations. The narrator views the world as a balance between these two forces. Laughter is on the side of the devils, he says, as laughter is caused by subversion. The first time an angel saw a devil laughing, the narrator says, the angel was confused. However, the angel deduced that laughter was contagious and—in some way—sacrilegious. The angel tried to stop the devil laughing by mimicking the laughter in a mocking tone. This mockery, the narrator says, is similar to the laughter of Gabrielle and Michelle. According to the narrator, the devil emerged victorious from the interaction with the angel because the idea of a laughing angel seemed so absurd as to make the devil laugh even more. Laughter, in its many forms, can be both diabolical and divine. Humans must determine which; this is seemingly a cosmic joke in and of itself.
The narrator discusses a photograph in which youthful protestors dance together in front of a line of soldiers. Their ring of dancing seems to unite them in innocence. The soldiers are predatory, joined together falsely, while the protestors are truly unified and joyful. This, the narrator says, is like an ancient form of magic. Madame Raphael seems to agree as she looks at the photograph. As she stares at the picture, she dreams of being accepted into this kind of group. She dreams of being accepted into any kind of group.
Michelle and Gabrielle read the play to one another. They discuss the play’s debate about whether a cat’s paws can be considered real. The theory eludes the girls, who decide that Ionesco must simply be using absurdity for “comic effect.” Delighting at their clever interpretation, they laugh again. Madame Raphael, walking in the street, seems to hear the girls’ manic laughter. She wonders whether someone is creating a magic ring of dancers. Once again, she notes, she has not been invited.
In 1948, the narrator recalls, he had his own experience of dancing in a ring. As the communists came to power, he joined his fellow students in celebrating whenever someone was hanged or the state proclaimed an anniversary. Since the narrator decided to criticize the communists, he “had to leave the ring dance” and was banned from the party (92). This saddened him, as he realized he would never be able to return to the circle. He felt as though he was free falling toward a terrible death. His human nature meant that he yearned to be back in the circle. One day, however, he witnessed an event. On the day after the historian Zavis Kalandra and the politician Milada Horakova were hanged as traitors, the narrator walked through the streets and saw people celebrating. Kalandra, the narrator explains, was associated with the poets André Breton and Paul Éluard. But Éluard refused to write in defense of Kalandra, as he was too involved in the theory of communism and the utopic vision of a communist future. He did not understand the bitter reality of life in communist Czechoslovakia. The narrator realized that he was closer to the men on the gallows than the people in the street. When he saw Éluard dancing and reciting poetry, he seemed to float up joyously into the sky. In the sky, he and his fellow dancers mixed with the smoke of the crematorium where Horakova and Kalandra were being burned. The dancers did not seem to notice. As he yearned to join the dancers, the narrator felt himself falling.
When the Soviet crackdown came, the narrator explains, he was in a vulnerable position. Writing his astrology column anonymously, he was considered an enemy of the state. R. warned him that his identity had been revealed and invited him to meet at a friend’s home to make a plan. When he arrived, however, the narrator found no one inside. Hearing a toilet flushing inside, he believed that R. was running to the bathroom so often because she was nervous. When he finally met with her, R. warned that the secret police questioned her. They asked her about the writer of the astrology column, and R. told them the truth, at which point she was warned not to collude with an enemy of the state. Once she signed a statement, she was freed, only to be fired from the magazine two days later. She could not find a job. The narrator assures her that he has the money from the editor’s commission, which the secret police do not know about. When R. laughed, the narrator was pleased that she could see the irony of the situation. They devised a plan to respond to future questions from the police, but she was often interrupted by her need to use the toilet.
Michelle and Gabrielle deliver their oral report on Rhinoceros. Standing before the rest of the class, they have made paper rhinoceros horns that they are now wearing. When they laugh, Madame Raphael laughs with them. The rest of the class watches with “a kind of embarrassed compassion” (101). Alone among them is a Jewish girl named Sarah. Previously, Sarah asked Michelle and Gabrielle to lend her their notes. They refused, and ever since, Sarah has sought revenge. As they deliver their report, Sarah walks to the front of the class and kicks each of the girls. The girls cry, but Madame Raphael—believing this to be part of the theatrical report—begins to laugh. Fearing that the teacher is laughing at them, Gabrielle and Michelle being to cry even harder. Thinking that their emotions are part of a dance—a dance that she is desperate to join—Madame Raphael begins to dance alongside them. As she forms a ring with the two girls, their tears turn to laughter.
The other students watch in “mute horror,” but the trio of dancers ignores them. The dancers lift off the ground, and the ceiling opens up above them, allowing them to float free. They ascend into the heavens, still laughing.
In someone else’s apartment, the narrator remembers, he met with R. He came to the realization that the people around him were always getting hurt, so he had decided to flee the country. Until this point, the narrator says, his relationship with R. was purely platonic. With R. having been tormented by the secret police, however, he found himself strangely aroused. He was overcome with “the wild desire to rape” her (105), having become obsessed with her hidden self. He sought to get to the essence of R. and believed that the only way to do so was through violence. The more she suffered, the deeper his obsession became. The thought of acting upon this urge horrified the narrator, however, so he decided to leave. However, the urge stays with him. The narrator reflects on this urge, wondering whether it involves a desire to catch R. before she fell from grace. He, too, feels as though he were falling away from the dance to a place where he would be tortured by the laughter of angels. The narrator likens himself to Sarah in his desire to rebel against the absurdity, only to be outdone.
“The Angels” uses two intertwining motifs—angels and circles—to dramatize how rituals of performance can result in the erasure of memory and meaning. The schoolroom farce with Gabrielle, Michelle, and their teacher, Madame Raphael, is framed as parody: The American girls glue bright cardboard cones to their faces to deliver an oral report on Ionesco’s Rhinoceros. They emit “high-pitched, short, spasmodic sounds” (78), a comic literalism that reduces the play to a joke about horns and laughter. When Sarah kicks them, their teacher, unable to read the humiliation on the girls’ faces, reinterprets the disruption as a progressive “happening” that is proof that “the interpretation of a work of art cannot be limited to the traditional theoretical approach” (103), and she bursts into laughter while the class looks on in horror. The three then clasp hands and begin to dance in a ring, and Gabrielle and Michelle’s sobs turn into laughter. The scene moves from classroom to vision as they rise from the floor, pass through a hole in the ceiling, and vanish, leaving only “the fading, radiant laughter of three archangels” (104). The naming is not accidental: Gabrielle, Michelle, and Madame Raphael echo the names of the archangels, and their laughter promises transcendence. The circle concentrates and seals their union, which Madame Raphael has yearned to be a part of for so long that she looks beyond the absurdity of the situation. What begins as a botched school report transforms into a metaphysical image: An absurd performance about an absurdist play becomes an angelic departure, as their circle offers them release from isolation and sorrow.
The episode is also a metafictional lesson on reading and highlights the theme of The Politics of Memory and Erasure. It stages an interpretation of Rhinoceros, critiques that interpretation, and then replaces it with an action in which meaning is replaced by spectacle. The girls’ discussion about symbols results in a parody in which they literalize the symbol by strapping horns to their faces, and their classmates respond with “embarrassed compassion.” Meanwhile, Madame Raphael interprets the scene with aesthetic absolutism, and she misrecognizes their pain as pedagogy. The narrator critiques this by interpolating a disquisition on “serious” laughter by asking whether laughter can be pure sensation, cleansed of memory and desire. In the novel’s moral universe, this can be dangerous as pure laughter abolishes memory, and the erasure of memory can never be innocent. The trio’s dance, then, can be read two ways: On the surface, it is an ecstatic liberation that strains toward heaven; at the same time, by reducing art to gesture and interpretation to choreography, the scene shows how culture can be consumed by its own surfaces and how the pursuit of a “modern approach” (103) to art and literature celebrates feeling while forfeiting understanding.
The narrator’s intrusion in the first person shifts the focus from allegory to autobiography and underscores Exile and the Fragmentation of Identity. He recalls the purge after 1968, ghost-writing an astrology column, and his shameful impulses toward a friend, R.—namely, his “wild desire to rape her” (105). This confession resists any consoling image of the exile as a purely noble victim. He also reflects on the circle motif through the framework of politics. He recalls how he once danced hand in hand in a ring of young activists, only to be expelled and to learn the “magical meaning of the circle” (92): that it closes and there is no way back in. Even the chapter’s titular angels reappear as a bitter metaphor for righteous abstraction in power, whether from generals to dissidents, whose stare dehumanizes those outside the circle to “insects to be crushed” (100). By interleaving the comic absurdity of the classroom scene with autobiographical candor, the narrator frames and deflects vulnerability. He confesses his compromises and his darkest impulses without surrendering to pathos. He portrays exile as a fall from the union symbolized by the ring. Identity is fragmented because it is pulled between the wish to float free of memory and the knowledge that such weightlessness is the logic of forgetting that props up power.



Unlock all 65 pages of this Study Guide
Get in-depth, chapter-by-chapter summaries and analysis from our literary experts.