53 pages • 1-hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Strobel interviews philosopher J. P. Moreland about human consciousness and whether materialist explanations can adequately account for the existence and nature of the human mind. Moreland distinguishes between the physical brain—the three-pound organ of neurons and synapses—and the immaterial mind, arguing that consciousness, thoughts, beliefs, desires, intentions, and subjective sensations cannot be reduced to mere neurological processes or identified with brain states. Moreland explores what philosophers call the “hard problem” of consciousness: why physical processes in the brain, which can be observed and measured, should give rise to subjective first-person experiences and self-awareness. He presents several distinctive features of consciousness that seem to require something beyond mere matter. These include the unity of consciousness (consciousness as an integrated experience rather than fragmented sensations), intentionality (the ability of thoughts to refer to things beyond themselves), qualia (subjective experiences like the redness of red or the painfulness of pain that seem irreducible to physical description), genuine libertarian free will, and the immediate first-person knowledge people have of their own mental states.
Moreland argues that if human beings are purely physical organisms without immaterial souls, then consciousness either becomes inexplicable or must be denied altogether as an illusion. The discussion touches on various philosophical attempts to explain consciousness in purely naturalistic terms—including identity theory, functionalism, and eliminative materialism—and examines why these explanations ultimately prove unsatisfactory or counterintuitive. As Moreland states, “If the history of the universe is just a story of physical processes being applied to physical materials, you’d end up with increasingly complicated arrangements of physical materials, but you’re not going to get something that’s completely nonphysical” (264). Moreland contends that the existence of consciousness, particularly in its robust form with all its distinctive features, is better explained by the existence of an immaterial soul or mind that interacts with but is not identical to the brain. This dualistic understanding in turn points toward a Creator who designed humans with both physical and spiritual dimensions, made in the image of a God who is conscious, personal, and relational.
With the interviews complete, Strobel now reflects on what he has learned. He presents the evidence in the form of a legal case and draws on the example of a famous case in which a prosecutor with complete confidence in his case was shocked by the surprise testimony of several witnesses who disputed his claims. Strobel feels as if he is in the position of the prosecutor—having once been entirely confident in the case for Darwinism, only to be shocked when indisputable evidence to the contrary was presented. Using the framework of a legal case, Strobel works back through the testimony of the previous chapters’ interviews.
He takes two possible conclusions—the Darwinism hypothesis and the design hypothesis—and assesses how each one stacks up against the evidence. In his view, the verdict has become undeniably clear. Only design, and not Darwinism, can explain the features of the universe we inhabit: “As I reviewed the avalanche of information from my investigation, I found the evidence for an intelligent designer to be credible, cogent, and compelling” (283). Strobel then argues that the evidence suggests not only that the universe is designed, but also that this Designer has made himself known to humanity. Strobel links the evidence for design to the biblical descriptions of God’s power, character, and love, encouraging readers to consider the personal call of faith toward which the evidence presses them: “At some point, the truth demands a response. When we decide not merely to ponder the abstract concept of a designer but to embrace him as our own—to make him ‘true God’—then we can meet him personally, relate to him daily, and spend eternity with him as he promises” (287).
The final two chapters in Strobel’s book tie up some loose ends and bring the whole structure to its conclusion. While the immediately preceding chapters focused on questions of hard science—astronomy, molecular biology, and biochemistry—Chapter 10 zooms back out to deal with an issue that strikes to the core of the human experience: consciousness itself. Philosophical considerations have not been left untouched in Strobel’s book (for example, in the epistemological considerations of Chapter 4 and the cosmological deductions of Chapter 5), but Chapter 10 dives into philosophical ontology (the study of being) to a degree unmatched by the other interviews. This is a thematically fitting topic for the final interview, as it not only informs the reader about external scientific considerations but also connects with the reader’s own internal world, bringing the question of design back home to look at the reality of each person’s soul. This implicitly personal-experiential element was lacking in the previous chapters and allows Strobel to draw his case toward its conclusion, which not only affirms the existence of a Designer but also urges readers to establish a personal relationship with God.
Chapter 11 departs from the literary structure that has dominated the book from Chapter 3 onward. Strobel shifts from journalistic interviews to the pattern of a legal case, complete with weighing evidence and bringing forward a verdict. It is important to note, though, that these two literary models—journalistic interviews and legal presentations—cohere in Strobel’s professional training as an investigative journalist. This includes both seeking and recording evidence (as in interviews) and then bringing the investigation to a conclusion via a closing argument. To critics who object to the way the arguments are presented, Strobel can appeal to his own professional background.
The main themes of the book all reappear in these chapters, largely due to the comprehensive nature of Chapter 11’s overview and assessment of the collected evidence. Chapter 10 also draws in The Scientific Method as a Means of Assessing Evidence for Supernatural Realities, though largely to show science’s apparent insufficiency in the face of certain philosophical problems. In this case, Strobel suggests, it is the limitation of the scientific method that points toward a supernatural reality: Science’s failure to explain consciousness by naturalistic means is itself an indication that something beyond nature must exist. Where previous chapters highlighted the scientific method’s usefulness in gathering data with which one can make a reasoned inference, Chapter 10 thus suggests that in some cases, the very failure of the scientific method to obtain an answer can be a powerful indication of supernatural reality.
Chapter 10 also touches on The Complexity of Biological Systems Challenging Materialism, though in a different way than previous chapters did. Whereas other chapters pointed at biological systems’ complexity as a way to say that the surprising abundance of complexity denotes the presence of design, Chapter 10 looks at the biological complexity of the brain and notes that despite its complexity, it does not appear sufficient to explain the experiential phenomena that are linked to it. Essentially, this chapter is saying that biological complexity on its own fails to explain what humans routinely observe. Both approaches, while different, end up with the same conclusion: Naturalistic materialism must be false because it cannot explain either the origins of a given biological system or the phenomenological output of that system.
By the end of his book, then, Strobel has layered several different ways of understanding and viewing the relevant data, approaching the problem from multiple scientific and philosophical perspectives. The fact that so many domains of human knowledge can produce arguments for theism is itself, in Strobel’s view, an argument that humans live in a world that is ordered to point toward God.



Unlock all 53 pages of this Study Guide
Get in-depth, chapter-by-chapter summaries and analysis from our literary experts.