44 pages • 1-hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Content Warning: This section of the guide includes discussion of graphic violence and death.
Halving serves as the central symbol of Calvino’s novella, representing the artificial and destructive separation of human moral complexity into pure extremes. When Medardo is literally divided by the cannonball, this physical splitting symbolizes humanity’s tendency toward reductive thinking about good and evil. The narrator explains that “just half of him ha[s] been saved, the right part, which [i]s perfectly preserved, without a scratch on it, except for that huge slash separating it from the left-hand part blown away” (13). This precise division creates two incomplete beings, each representing a moral extreme that proves equally destructive to society. The symbol gains depth through its extension into the natural world, where the Bad ’Un systematically halves every living thing he encounters—pears, mushrooms, flowers, and creatures—reinforcing the unnaturalness of such division.
The symbol directly illuminates the theme of The Necessity of Moral Complexity for Human Wholeness. Both halves, despite their opposing natures, create suffering: the Bad ’Un through cruelty and the Good ’Un through oppressive virtue. The splitting represents what happens when humans attempt to perfect themselves by eliminating supposedly negative aspects of their nature. In the narrative, only through Medardo’s final reunion and restoration does his authentic identity emerge, suggesting that true wisdom comes from integrating rather than segregating the full spectrum of human experience. The split thus becomes a warning against moral extremism and a call for embracing the complex, contradictory nature of human existence.
The motif of medicine and healing throughout the novella represents both the possibility of restoration and the complex relationship between wholeness and fragmentation. Dr. Trelawney, despite his reluctance to treat human ailments, ultimately becomes the agent of Medardo’s restoration, while the mysterious hermits who saved the Good ’Un provide the initial healing that makes survival possible. The final reunion scene emphasizes this theme when Trelawney triumphantly declares, “He’s saved, he’s saved! He’s saved! Leave it to me,” followed by the careful process of binding the halves together until “all guts and arteries of both parts” correspond properly (109). This meticulous restoration process symbolizes the delicate work needed to achieve authentic identity and moral complexity.
The motif connects directly to the theme of Searching for Authentic Identity in a Fragmented World. Throughout the narrative, various forms of healing—from Sebastiana’s herbal knowledge to the Good ’Un’s attempts to tend wounded swallows—represent humanity’s instinctive drive toward an authentic integration of one’s whole self. However, the motif also reveals the inadequacy of simplistic solutions to complex problems. Dr. Trelawney’s avoidance of human patients and preference for natural phenomena suggest that confronting, not avoiding, the messiness of human nature is what leads to true healing. The successful restoration of Medardo demonstrates that authentic identity emerges not from eliminating contradictory elements but from integrating them into a coherent whole that embraces all aspects of a person.
The gibbet and scaffold function as symbols of moral extremism taken to its logical conclusion, representing how absolute systems of justice become instruments of dehumanization and control. Master Pietrochiodo’s elaborate execution devices embody the Bad ’Un’s extreme approach to justice, where minor infractions result in death sentences. The carpenter’s skill in creating these instruments reflects the seductive precision of extreme moral systems. When Medardo condemns “Fiorfiero and his whole band to die by hanging” along with “those robbed” for poaching and the constables for tardiness (24-25), the scaffold becomes a symbol of how moral absolutism eliminates nuance and proportion. The final scaffold, designed “for hanging in profile” specifically for the two halves (95), represents the ultimate expression of this extremism—a system so rigid that it turns against itself.
The symbol directly underscores The Destructive Nature of Moral Extremism. Pietrochiodo’s internal conflict over building these devices reveals how extreme systems corrupt even well-intentioned individuals. He recognizes that “the scaffolds he [i]s constructing [a]re for innocent men” (33), yet he continues creating increasingly sophisticated instruments of torture because they function with perfect precision. This paradox illustrates how moral extremism seduces through its apparent clarity and efficiency; the scaffold’s mechanical perfection contrasts sharply with the messy complexity of human justice, suggesting that authentic moral systems must accommodate ambiguity rather than eliminate it through force.



Unlock the meaning behind every key symbol & motif
See how recurring imagery, objects, and ideas shape the narrative.