58 pages 1-hour read

The Crusades Through Arab Eyes

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 1983

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Part 3Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Part 3, Chapter 6 Summary

The Assassins and their families were hunted down in Damascus when Tughtigin’s son, Būri, ordered the execution of their protector, the vizier al-Mazadaghāni. Būri refused to be their “puppet” (110). The surviving Assassins thus turned to the Franj for an alliance; the Assassins would deliver Damascus to the Franks for Tyre.


The historicity of this plot is debatable but possible, because the Franj already set their sights on taking Damascus, so Tyre would have provided a refuge for the Assassins who could use it as a base to target Fatimid Egypt (which resisted their political machinations). Indeed, the surviving Assassins regrouped in Palestine, where they received King Baldwin II’s support. Soon the Franj forces arrived at the walls of Damascus, but an Arab-Turkish coalition defeated them while the Franks foraged at the plain of Ghūta.


The Franj regrouped, but nature had other plans when the September rains mired their camp in mud and they were forced to retreat: “Baldwyn II definitively renounced any new expedition against the city he coveted” (111). Nevertheless, the Assassins got their revenge when they severely maimed Būri in May 1131. He succumbed to his injuries a little over a year later.


Simultaneously, another powerful opposition leader to the Franks rose out of Aleppo and Mosul: Al-Din Zangī, whom the Abbasids supported. He spent 18 years traversing Syria and Iraq to eliminate Frankish threats and build a unified front: “Never did he dream of residing peacefully in one of the many palaces of his vast fiefdom” (114). He was different from the petty kings and rulers who came before. He sought the advice of well-educated advisors, enforced strict discipline among his troops, and “was possessed of severity, perseverance, and a strong sense of state” (114).


He worked to ensure his legitimacy of rule in three ways. First, he wed the daughter of the former ruler of Aleppo, Ridwān. Next he moved his father’s burial to Aleppo “to demonstrate his family’s new roots in the fiefdom” (114). Finally, he got the sultan to support his supremacy over Iraq and Syria. Zangi planned to create a unified realm that would outlive him. The Franks were in disarray, making the moment “ripe” for a “sweeping counter-offensive” (115).


Baldwin II’s daughter, Alix, sought an alliance with Zangī against her father. Alix was the widow of Antioch’s Bohemond II; when her husband was killed in battle in 1130, she orchestrated a coup to control the principality and reached out to Zangī:


It was a curious attitude for her to have taken. One that heralded the advent of a new second generation of the Franj, who had little in common with the pioneers of the invasion. The young princess, whose mother was Armenian and who had never set eyes on Europe, felt Oriental and acted as such. (115)


Her father soon headed north to confront the revolt, seized Antioch, and exiled Alix. He died soon after, leading to more turmoil among the Franks. Count Fulk of Anjou had recently arrived from Europe to assume the kingship of Jerusalem. Alix raised a revolt against him, destabilizing Frankish Palestine. Rumors circulated that Fulk’s wife, Queen Melisende, was involved with a knight named Hugh of Le Puiset, and factions formed around the parties. Hugh even took Jaffa, backed by Fatimid troops. Meanwhile, conflict between the Assassins and the new atabeg in Damascus flared while conflict in Baghdad also arose. These problems distracted Zangī from his focus on Syria.


Then, early in 1135, Zangī received a message from Ismā‘īl in Damascus, begging for help. He had purged many from his household, including his own brother, after an enslaved woman tried to assassinate him the year prior. He was thus trapped in a cycle of assassinations that only intensified resentment against him. Zangī’s support was essential, and without it he would turn to the Franj. The people of Damascus, however, disliked Zangī due to previous conflict. Ismā‘īl’s own mother, Zumurrud, had her son executed, likely because he was plotting against her lover, and replaced him with another son, Mahmūd, as ruler.


Zangī thus confronted his detractors in 1135. The result was a compromise in which Damascus’s atabeg acknowledged Zangī’s “suzerainty, which remained, however, purely nominal” (122). The atabeg retreated from Damascus, marched north, and conquered four Frankish cities.

Part 3, Chapter 7 Summary

Zangī’s first major confrontation with the Franj resulted in their defeat. His siege of their fortress at Bārin resulted in a massacre and capitulation to Zangī’s terms. King Fulk and the survivors escaped by turning over the fort and paying a hefty indemnity. Zangī was also alerted to the Byzantine movements into northern Syria and departed for Aleppo, where the emperor’s representatives made known that their goal was Antioch, then in Frankish hands, and which the First Crusaders had falsely promised to return to Byzantine control but kept.


However, the Byzantines and Franks negotiated an alarming treaty: The Franj would return Antioch while the emperor, John Comnenus, agreed to conquer and hand over multiple Muslim cities in Syria: “A new war of conquest was launched in 1138” (125). The newly allied forces besieged a minor city, Shayzar, which they believed Zangī would fail to protect, but their assumption was misguided, for he was a statesman who “organized and directed the resistance personally” (125). Within weeks Zangī rallied men from across the Middle East, while sending “agents” to foment discord between the Byzantines and Franks. Zangī’s efforts paid off. Then he married Zumurrud of Damascus, uniting central Syria with his holdings of Aleppo and Mosul.


Zangī presumed his new wife would get her son, Mahmūd, to turn power over to her new husband. She delayed doing so until three enslaved persons murdered Mahmūd and then appealed to Zangī to march on Damascus in 1139. The population, however, put up a strong resistance, and under the direction of the governor, Mu'in ad-Din ‘Unar, allied with the Franks. This alliance forced Zangī’s retreat to Baalbek, a fiefdom governed by Ayyub, Saladin’s father.


By 1144 Zangī reconquered the Crusader state of Edessa, which “served as a prelude” (133) to a new Crusade. Muslims celebrated this victory throughout the Middle East and rumors of an Islamic reconquest of Jerusalem began to spread. Zangī received new titles from the caliph in Baghdad for his heroism, while “the Frank trembled at the very mention of his name” (137) and asked for help from Europe.


Meanwhile, the people of Damascus fretted that Zangī would attack again, but he was murdered by an enslaved person in the summer of 1146. ‘Unar quickly led his forces from Damascus to Baalbek, thereby “reestablishing his suzerainty over all of central Syria in a few weeks” (139). The deposed Joscelin II planned his reconquest of Edessa while Raymond of Antioch besieged Aleppo. Nevertheless, all was not lost, for Zangī had laid the grounds for a state that would rise again.

Part 3 Analysis

Part 3 of the text highlights Crusading as a Multi-Ethnic Religious Conflict and the persistence of The Context of Inter-Muslim Political Turmoil in Maalouf’s treatment of the Assassins sect. The Assassins’ history links to regional disputes between Shia and Sunni Muslims, for the sect sought to dominate Fatimid Egypt, and unite it with Syria, which was majority Sunni. The Assassins also used the Frankish presence in the Holy Land to their advantage, allying with Baldwin II and acquiring Tyre as a base for new attacks after their violent expulsion from Damascus.


Zangī’s rise underscores the challenges these regional conflicts presented, and which he understood. Indeed, the title of Maalouf’s seventh chapter, “An Emir Among Barbarians,” drawn from an Arab source, intentionally contrasts him with other regional leaders. His abandonment of his planned siege of Damascus in 1146 provides evidence of his intelligence and political acumen. He chose to focus on consolidation of his base rather than further conquest when revolt arose in Edessa, a city he recently conquered.


Maalouf presents Zangī as a shrewd and intelligent leader, countering Western misconceptions about the medieval Islamic world as backward, a stereotype that some impose on the present. Maalouf thus subtly alludes to The Links Between Crusade History and Contemporary Politics when he presents Zangī as a corrective to Western assumptions. Maalouf likewise contrasts medieval Arab and European society more generally in Chapter 7 when he contrasts the rationality of Muslim justice with the Crusaders’ “macabre farce” (131) of trials by ordeal, in which it was believed that God would save the innocent. He similarly condemns European scientific and medical practices as “primitive” (131).


The Islamic world was indeed advanced in the fields of mathematics, astronomy, medicine, and other sciences at this time. However, in his effort to shift readers’ perspectives of the Muslim world, Maalouf perpetuates the myth of the European Middle Ages as a “Dark Age.” Europeans did not rely solely on prayer or superstitious practices for healing, and had inherited some scientific and medical knowledge from Rome and through the translations of Arabic texts into Latin in the Iberian Peninsula.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Unlock all 58 pages of this Study Guide

Get in-depth, chapter-by-chapter summaries and analysis from our literary experts.

  • Grasp challenging concepts with clear, comprehensive explanations
  • Revisit key plot points and ideas without rereading the book
  • Share impressive insights in classes and book clubs