63 pages 2-hour read

The Eyes Are the Best Part

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 2024

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Character Analysis

Ji-won

Content Warning: This section of the guide includes discussion of racism, suicidal ideation, gender discrimination, sexual harassment, mental illness, graphic violence, death, and emotional abuse.


Ji-won is both the protagonist and the unreliable narrator of The Eyes Are the Best Part. Throughout the novel, her psychological deterioration creates increasing ambiguity surrounding the accuracy of her reported perceptions. At multiple points in the novel, strange events seemingly happen without any explanation only to be revealed as elaborate dreams that express her desires—e.g., to eat blue eyes. Her unreliability also manifests through selective information sharing, as demonstrated in her concealment of Umma’s suicidal ideation from Ji-hyun and her manipulation of multiple characters’ perceptions of events. As a dynamic character, she transforms from victim to aggressor, though this transformation follows patterns established in her earlier manipulation of high school friendships.


The text develops Ji-won’s character through significant contrasts. Her academic struggles at college contrast with her intelligence (as evidenced by her sophisticated manipulation of others), while her protective impulses toward family contrast with her increasing violence toward strangers. These contradictions create a complex psychological portrait that resists simple categorization. Ji-won is simultaneously supportive and dismissive, kind and cruel, loving and distant, and these internal tensions invite reflection about the external tensions that may have contributed to them (e.g., between The False Promise of Assimilation and the pressure to preserve one’s heritage).


Ji-won’s characterization also emerges through repeated motifs of observation and consumption. Her initial reluctance to eat fish eyes evolves into compulsive consumption of human eyes, marking her transformation from passive observer to active predator. This evolution parallels her shift from being watched (by George, Geoffrey, etc.) to becoming the watcher, suggesting a reclamation of power through violence and developing the theme of Consumption as Power. As the novel progresses and Ji-won gains more and more interpersonal power, her need to consume becomes overpowering, suggesting that she is not merely reclaiming her agency but perpetuating the violence of white supremacy and misogyny.


The narrative develops this idea in part through Ji-won’s relationships with three key male figures: Appa, George, and Geoffrey. Each relationship represents a different form of male control; Appa, for instance, is Ji-won’s father and expresses disappointment that she is not a boy, while Geoffrey represents a more “modern” form of misogyny masked by outward allegiance to feminism. Cultural identity also shapes Ji-won’s characterization and her interactions with power. Her ambivalent relationship with Korean tradition appears in her initial rejection and later embrace of eye consumption, while her targeting of blue-eyed men suggests both internalized racism and revenge for fetishization. The text develops these elements through Ji-won’s speech patterns, which shift between cultural contexts, and her observations of cultural appropriation by characters like Geoffrey.

Umma

Ji-won’s mother, Umma, emerges as a complex supporting character whose behavior reflects years of discrimination and emotional abuse. Umma exhibits contradictory traits: resilience in survival yet vulnerability to exploitation, maternal protection alongside emotional neglect of her daughters’ needs, devotion to her culture of origin but disdain for Korean men, etc. The novel implies that these patterns were established at an early age, when Umma was abandoned by her family out of desperation. Abandonment repeats itself throughout her life, and after Appa leaves her, her fear of this abandonment becomes overwhelming. More recently, Umma’s internalized racism, expressed through her preference for white men over Korean men, suggests complex cultural trauma and assimilation pressures. This tension manifests in her speech patterns, which remain predominantly Korean, requiring her daughters to translate for George.


Her characterization develops partially through domestic actions and spaces. The preparation of traditional Korean food, particularly fish, serves as a key characterization tool, while her obsessive creation of paper flowers for her wedding to George represents an attempt to manufacture normalcy amid chaos. These domestic activities function as both cultural markers and psychological indicators, revealing her attempts to maintain control through ritual and routine. Her initial practice of eating fish eyes transforms from cultural tradition to superstitious ritual after Appa’s departure, reflecting her psychological state, which only deteriorates further after she begins dating George.

Geoffrey

Geoffrey, a student at Ji-won’s college, functions as both a secondary antagonist and a foil to the novel’s primary antagonist, George, representing a younger iteration of predatory male behavior masked by performative feminism. His initial introduction wearing feminist slogans establishes his character’s fundamental contradiction, as he quickly becomes the embodiment of entitled masculinity. His characterization develops through increasingly invasive actions: the forceful addition of his phone number to Ji-won’s contacts, his surveillance of her movements, and his ultimate theft of her backpack as leverage. Geoffrey is a round, complex character who evolves from an apparently supportive classmate to a stalker, though this evolution represents uncovering rather than transformation.


The narrative develops Geoffrey through parallel behaviors with George, creating a pattern of white male entitlement across generations and cultural contexts. Both characters demonstrate possessiveness, racial fetishization, and the weaponization of women’s supposed need for “protection” as justification for control. For instance, Geoffrey’s gift of chopsticks reveals he holds stereotypical views of Asian culture despite his progressive self-presentation and echoes George’s similarly tokenizing or appropriative gestures. In many ways, Geoffrey’s performative allyship makes him a more unpredictable and dangerous character than someone like George, who is more open about who he is and what he’s capable of.


Geoffrey’s role in the narrative’s climax, when he follows Ji-won during her attempted murder of George, reveals the extent of his obsession with Ji-won while providing her with a convenient scapegoat. Ji-won’s final actions, saving herself while framing Geoffrey for her murders, reverses the typical portrayal of a white man exploiting a woman of color, as Ji-won relies on Geoffrey’s predatory behavior toward her to frame him for her crimes.

George

George is the primary antagonist of The Eyes Are the Best Part, representing institutionalized forms of racial and gender-based oppression. His character reveals itself through escalating displays of control: linguistic dominance in refusing to pronounce Korean names, economic power through ostentatious displays of wealth, and physical intimidation through invasion of personal space. Though he initially presents himself as sensitive and worldly, his true manipulative character shines through immediately upon encountering pushback from Umma’s daughters.


The text employs specific cultural markers to further characterize George. George displays his wealth, opinions, and status ostentatiously, with Republican bumper stickers on his truck, a wallet full of $100 bills, and a prominent Rolex watch. These possessions represent both his social position and value system while foreshadowing his eventual economic downfall (after losing his job). Additionally, George reveals himself through his fetishization of Asian women: George displays inappropriate behavior toward both Ji-won and Ji-hyun and also objectifies Asian servers in front of his fiancée and her daughters, openly and without apology. The tension between George’s obsession with the surface-level markers of Asian identity and his distrust of its deeper aspects extends to his behavior. He claims to be fluent in Korean despite being barely able to pronounce Ji-won and Ji-hyun’s names, and he insists on “authentic” restaurant experiences that in no way reflect the actual food culture of South Korea. These elements of his characterization develop themes of consumption and assimilation, revealing how a dominant culture can amalgamate (often distorted) elements of a subordinated culture.


Geroge’s blue eyes become a significant characterization tool, immediately indicating his separateness from the characters of color while also connecting him to Ji-won’s victims and marking him as the catalyst for her rampage. His ultimate fate as Ji-won’s final murder victim, at least within the scope of the narrative, positions him as both the culmination of her criminal evolution and as a substitute for deeper patriarchal trauma. The text develops this connection through parallel abandonment patterns between George and Appa, suggesting systemic rather than individual patterns of male behavior.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Unlock analysis of every major character

Get a detailed breakdown of each character’s role, motivations, and development.

  • Explore in-depth profiles for every important character
  • Trace character arcs, turning points, and relationships
  • Connect characters to key themes and plot points