62 pages 2-hour read

The Heir Apparent

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 2025

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

Content Warning: This section of the guide includes discussion of death, child death, disordered eating, emotional abuse, gender discrimination, racism, and anti-gay bias.

Duty Versus Personal Freedom

The tension between duty and freedom lies at the heart of The Heir Apparent. Through Lexi’s experiences navigating her royal status, the novel suggests that obligation and fulfillment can coincide but that some attempts to reconcile them are dead ends.


At the start of the novel, Lexi’s life centers around her personal freedom. She lives in Australia and works as a doctor, unaffected by royal life and the burden of royal duty. She pursued this life because she felt suffocated by the expectations associated with being a princess, but Lexi is only third in line for the throne; particularly in the context of Louis’s marriage to Amira, which raised the possibility of children, she has no reason to think she will become heir. In fact, she is able to rationalize her very disengagement as a form of duty. By staying away, she lets Louis shine—a point underscored by her comparison of herself to Barbara Villiers’s twin daughter who died days after birth, her strength given in the womb to William, the heir and future king. Even amid her estrangement from her family, Lexi has thus found a way to reconcile her sense of obligation with her desire for freedom.


Frederick and Louis’s deaths upend this fragile balance, forcing Lexi to deal directly with the tension between what she wants and what she feels she ought to do. For one, Lexi must reckon with the fact that those around her have a very different interpretation of her choices. Amira calls Lexi “conceited” for leaving the royal family, saying, “You have always thought you were better than everyone else. You had to move to Australia to prove how much smarter and how much more special you are than the rest of us” (117). Amira cannot understand Lexi’s decision to leave, seeing it as an abdication not only of her role as royalty but also of her duties as a sister and friend. The public echoes Amira’s sentiments. Mary tells Lexi that the public describes her as “selfish” for “shirking her duty” (226). Simultaneously, returning to England clarifies the stakes of prioritizing duty, particularly as defined by others, above all else. Everything Frederick did as Queen Eleanor’s firstborn son was in service of his inevitable reign, as Lexi observes at the funeral: “[Frederick] had spent his life expecting that upon his death the Sovereign’s Orb and Sceptre would be placed on top of his casket. Instead he got a floral arrangement teased to perfection” (106). Frederick never became king; he died with the weight of duty crushing him without ever even becoming the reigning monarch. The implication is that a life of duty is often a life unlived.


Nevertheless, Lexi finds herself considering assuming the duty of heir. Loyalty to her brother is part of what motivates her; stung by Amira’s accusations, she sees taking his place as a form of atonement. However, she also believes she sees a new path toward reconciling duty and freedom. In noting the “small, stirring moments [she] had so far kept a secret” that inspire her to continue forward, she mentions “The day the obstetric fistula hospital in Nairobi had accepted the offer of [her] patronage” (272). Lexi’s patronage of the hospital is emblematic of her hopes to change the monarchy for the better—to create a “modern monarchy that would require members of the family to be loyal and true” (172). In this way, she could fulfill her obligations as a royal while also honoring her personal convictions.


Ultimately, however, Richard’s blackmail weighs too heavily upon her, and she realizes that the monarchy is rooted in traditionalism, secrecy, and oppression: “I could not believe I’d once had the gall to think I could fix those things” (283). Lexi recognizes it’s not her duty to fix a system that she didn’t break. She does satisfy her sense of moral obligation by going public with Richard’s actions, but she then steps away, ending the narrative with her freedom intact, home in Australia with Jack. The conclusion thus resolves the conflict between duty and freedom by suggesting that the most important form of duty is to oneself and one’s own values.

The Burden of Legacy and Public Expectation

Lexi grapples with the legacy of her family throughout The Heir Apparent. That legacy is related to yet distinct from the obligations her status entails, as it also encompasses the weight of history, including the monarchy’s complicity in various injustices. It is thus a particularly charged burden to bear, yet Lexi’s attempts to carve a more sustainable role for herself consistently collide with another set of expectations: the public’s ideas about what the monarchy should be.


The novel demonstrates that the Villiers family legacy is not simply one of service, as Eleanor suggests when she discusses the queen’s role as a “mother” to her citizens. Rather, it is bound up in systemic oppression—particularly imperialism. As Mary explains, Isla’s actions, including a trip to advocate for the people of Darfur, were an attempt to acknowledge and atone for the monarchy’s role in the building of the British Empire: “Everyone slammed her, but that was the moment everything should have changed […] [The monarchy] should apologise for the past and be a moral leader of the future” (137-38). Isla wanted to raise awareness of the historical pain the monarchy caused and push the monarchy toward advocacy, but the resistance that Mary highlights reveals how deeply embedded within the monarchy those imperialist impulses were. Similarly, Isla’s experiences highlight the entrenched sexism within the institution. In encouraging Lexi to prioritize herself, James says, “Our father rarely spoke to us, but when he did, he would say to Isla, ‘Be careful, your face is your future.’ She always wanted to get away from him, but in the end, she married a man just like him” (79). For Isla, as a noblewoman, the path to upholding her family’s legacy lay in capitalizing on her appearance and marrying well.


Lexi struggles against similar expectations in the narrative present, but her efforts to combat them are complicated by an ever-expanding media presence. Without a clearly defined role in the modern world, Lexi notes, the monarchy had to find a way to justify its continued existence: “Whether it was a clever scheme or a catastrophic mistake, my grandparents transformed our family into tabloid stars. In exchange for millions of taxpayer pounds and a promise to remain at the centre of British life, we invited our subjects’ scrutiny” (100-01). The royal family keeps its privileged lifestyle, but instead of making legislative decisions, it supplies entertainment to the masses. As Lexi notes, this transformation is decades old, but the novel suggests that it has accelerated as a result of social media and online culture. More than ever, public expectation informs the lives of the royals, and it is generally more interested in gossip than substantive debate of the kind Lexi would like to engage in.


In the end, Lexi therefore largely sets aside her attempts to use her position to steer the public conversation when she relinquishes her claim to the crown. However, she does not entirely abandon her hopes of reforming the monarchy. Lexi realizes that she herself isn’t the right person to change the Villiers legacy, but she reminds Demelza, “You’re much smarter than anyone gives you credit for. […] [D]on’t you think you have a bigger role to play in this family than just being someone’s pretty little daughter?” (361). Lexi’s words suggest that a subtler approach to changing the Villiers legacy is required—one that does not overtly flout expectations but rather maneuvers carefully within the system to create change.

The Challenges of Identity Formation Under Institutional Constraints

The burdens and complications of royalty shape the members of the Villiers family in crucial ways. In part, this is because public appearance and institutional biases demand that individuals suppress aspects of themselves. Most obviously, Louis is forced to hide his orientation by dating and marrying Amina, but other members of the family engage in similar concealment or contortion; for instance, Lexi and Isla’s eating disorders reflect their efforts to fit a particular image. However, the challenges characters face in defining themselves also stem from the allure of royal status itself.


For example, Richard cheats on his wife, Florence, constantly, and yet they stay married. Lexi thinks, “I could never understand why she would endure such indignity, but in more ways than one, a royal family is like the Mafia; you never truly leave it behind” (112). Florence cannot exit the royal family, even as her husband frequently betrays and humiliates her, because she views royalty as integral to her identity; she’d rather be a notable noblewoman with a philandering husband than take the difficult step of separating from Richard and making a life of her own. Amira almost falls into the same trap, so drawn to the idea of being queen that she enters into a passionless (if amicable) relationship with Louis and endures mistreatment by the public and the rest of the royal family. Even after Louis’s death, she hesitates to relinquish her royal connections, struggling to discern who she is outside the label of “future queen” or “royal widow,” as well as outside her role protecting Louis and the monarchy from negative press.  


Lexi’s struggle to determine her identity plays a particularly integral role in the narrative. Unlike many other characters, Lexi has little emotional investment in her royal status; in fact, she left her royal life behind to forge a new identity as Dr. Lexi Villiers instead of Princess Alexandrina. This identity is fragile, however, as Lexi remains third in the line of succession. Lexi’s identity is thus split; she sees herself as both an individual, Dr. Lexi Villiers, and as a cog in the royal family, Princess Alexandrina. Moreover, being Princess Alexandrina requires Lexi to give up key pieces of herself: to bury her secrets and her feelings and to vie for a crown she doesn’t want.


Ultimately, Lexi isn’t willing to surrender who she is to claim the crown. The novel underscores this point by comparing her to one of her forebears:


Three centuries ago, my ancestor Barbara Villiers had transformed herself from impoverished noblewoman to concubine to de facto monarch […] As London rippled outwards and its buildings grew taller, the crown had been slowly, slowly inching towards me. I did not expect it; I did not desire it. And when it spun into view and hovered above my hands, I found that I couldn’t do what needed to be done for it to be mine (384).


Barbara crafted her identity around her royal aspirations. She took careful steps to rise to the highest rank in England, turning herself from a noblewoman into queen regent. Lexi does the inverse: She takes careful steps to remove herself from the royal family, to turn herself from heir apparent into a regular doctor in Hobart, Tasmania. She clings to the parts of herself that mean the most to her—to her honesty, her selflessness, and her ability to help others—even if that means turning her back on the family and institution that has shaped her irrevocably.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text

Unlock every key theme and why it matters

Get in-depth breakdowns of the book’s main ideas and how they connect and evolve.

  • Explore how themes develop throughout the text
  • Connect themes to characters, events, and symbols
  • Support essays and discussions with thematic evidence