65 pages • 2-hour read
Fyodor DostoevskyA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Content Warning: This section includes discussion of graphic violence, physical abuse, emotional abuse, death, mental illness, sexual harassment, gender discrimination, and animal death.
After the holidays, Alexander Petrovich soon falls ill and is sent to the military hospital. The prisoners’ wards are usually crowded with convicts, soldiers on trial, men from the correctional company, and others under guard. Sick prisoners first report to the sergeant, then they are examined at the battalion infirmary and, if judged truly ill, they are sent to the hospital.
On arrival, Alexander is examined by the kindly doctor. He is given hospital linen and a filthy brown robe, then taken to a narrow ward lined with beds. The outward cleanliness of the hospital strikes him at once, but the ward itself is stifling and full of unpleasant smells from sickness, medicines, and unwashed garments.
The patients inspect the newcomer with curiosity. One of the first to speak with Alexander is a thickset clerk on trial for counterfeiting, a vain and self-assured man who insists on his gentility and explains the rules of the hospital. Another patient, the gray-haired soldier Chekunov, eagerly offers to make tea for Alexander in hopes of pleasing a man he assumes has money. This provokes bitter remarks from the dying consumptive, Ustyantsev, who directs his anger more at Alexander than at the man assisting him. Alexander realizes that—despite his wish to appear independent—others constantly treat him as a gentleman who must be served.
He studies the ward and notes the mixture of real and faked sicknesses. Some patients truly suffer, while others have come simply to rest. He is especially struck by two consumptives. Ustyantsev is already near death while the other, a young convict from the special section named Mikhailov, is now wasting away rapidly. Alexander is also repelled by the filth of the hospital. His filthy robes are soaked by former patients’ discharges; there are lice, bedbugs, and the uncaring habits of the convicts, who seem accustomed to such things.
A flogged young recruit is brought into the ward that evening after running the gauntlet. His back is torn to pieces, and he paces in feverish silence with a wet sheet over his shoulders. Alexander gives him hot tea, which the man drinks wordlessly before returning to his pacing. The other prisoners help such men practically and without display, changing wet cloths and removing splinters from broken rods, while the punished themselves endure pain with striking self-control.
At night, the ward is locked and a tub is left inside, though there is a toilet just outside the door. Alexander reflects bitterly on the pointlessness of such rules, especially the continued use of fetters for dying men. These thoughts culminate in the death of Mikhailov, who spends his last hours in painful suffocation, stripped almost naked except for his fetters. After he dies, the prisoners quietly close his eyes and replace the cross on his neck. When the sergeant arrives and sees the corpse still in fetters, he is visibly shaken. As the body is carried out, Chekunov suddenly says of the dead man that “he had a mother, too” (180). The blacksmith is summoned so that the fetters may finally be removed.
In the hospital, the prisoners are first seen each morning by the intern and later by the head doctor and other physicians. Alexander describes the intern as a knowledgeable and gentle young man whom the prisoners like very much, though they think him too soft. He often allows doubtful cases to remain in the ward. Alexander reflects more broadly that simple people often distrust hospitals and medical administration, partly from fear of official institutions and partly from stories about harsh rules, but that many doctors themselves win real affection and respect through kindness and humanity.
Among the prisoners there is an understood arrangement by which men who are not truly ill may still remain in the ward under the vague diagnosis of febris catarrhalis, which the prisoners jokingly interpret as “spare cramps.” The intern allows such cases to stay for a time if they need rest from work or relief from the guardhouse. Only when a man abuses this tolerance does the doctor timidly urge him to recover and ask for discharge.
The head doctor, who is humane but firmer, dismisses such men more decisively. One prisoner pretends for a long time to have an eye infection to postpone a sentence of a thousand strokes. He secretly irritates his eyes at night with lime. When the doctors finally resort to the “very painful” treatment of a seton, cutting the skin at the back of his neck and passing a tape through the wound to keep it open, the man endures the torture for several days before finally agreeing to be discharged. As soon as the wound heals, he is sent to receive his punishment.
Alexander reflects on the fear of flogging. Some prisoners will resort to extraordinary measures to delay it, while others ask to be discharged before their backs have healed so that the punishment may be finished sooner. He recalls the story of a baptized Kalmyk from the special section also named Alexander, who claimed that he could survive 4,000 strokes for killing an officer because he had been “under the lash since childhood” (186). He tells how he repeatedly pretended to die during the punishment, so that he would be taken to the hospital and then sent back later to complete the sentence. He recounts all this with cheerfulness and without bitterness, which astonishes Alexander.
In general, Alexander is struck by how often beaten men speak of their punishments calmly, even humorously, without “even the slightest shade of spite or hatred” (187). This attitude seems connected to their sense that punishment is simply part of an inevitable struggle with authority, not necessarily a moral condemnation in the eyes of their own people.
Alexander records the prisoners’ stories about two officers known for supervising corporal punishment. Lieutenant Zherebyatnikov is remembered with contempt as a cruel man who enjoys torment for its own sake and invents tricks to raise false hopes in condemned men, only to order them flogged without mercy. Lieutenant Smekalov, by contrast, is remembered almost affectionately. Though he also punishes, he speaks with prisoners in an easy and familiar manner, jokes with them, and seems to them “all heart.” The prisoners laugh at the memory of his tricks and speak of him with warmth.
Alexander explains that only in the hospital does he gain a direct view of corporal punishment, though most of these techniques have changed since his time. Convicts punished from the battalions, prison sections, and military units around the town are brought to the prisoners’ wards and, in his first weeks there, Alexander watches them closely. He wants to understand their attitude toward punishment.
Men who are waiting to undergo the second half of a sentence, after their backs have healed from the first, are usually gloomy and distracted. The others generally avoid speaking about what awaits them. Once punishment begins, however, even men who had been terrified often endure it “manfully.” Only Orlov had seemed different, because he was impatient to finish his sentence and continue toward exile and escape. He took heart after surviving the first half of his punishment. After the second half, Orlov died in the hospital.
Alexander becomes preoccupied with the nature of physical pain and asks many prisoners about it. They all answer in the same way, saying that it burns “like fire.” He also hears the common opinion that the birch is more tormenting than the rod, even if the birch can be endured in greater numbers without immediate danger to life. This reflection leads Alexander into a broader condemnation of corporal punishment itself, which he sees as corrupting not only for the victim but for the man who inflicts it. He argues that habitual power over another human body and humiliation of another person’s dignity turns cruelty into a kind of intoxication and destroys humanity in the punisher, since “tyranny is a habit” (197).
Alexander then turns to the figure of the executioner. The official executioner—though despised and feared—is at least recognized openly for what he is. He is usually a convict kept for that duty, separated from others. He is vain, proud, and often materially comfortable because he receives bribes from condemned men who seek lighter blows. He may promise to punish less harshly, though he always gives the first blow with full force. Alexander recalls one such executioner as intelligent, self-important, and strangely dignified, even while carrying out the “humiliating” task of killing stray dogs in town.
Hospital life itself remains “terribly boring.” Meals are one of the few diversions, since rations vary by illness and can be sold or supplemented with food purchased through the guards. The arrival of new patients, especially men in transit or recently flogged, also breaks the boredom. Occasionally, prisoners fake mental illness to delay punishment, while those who truly do have mental illnesses are brought in for observation. At first, such men seem amusing to the ward, but they soon become unbearable. One was Sergeant Ostrozhski, a Polish overseer Alexander had once respected who is now in a reduced state. Another prisoner, terrified of an expected flogging, invents a fantasy that a colonel’s daughter has fallen in love with him and will save him. Two days after leaving the ward, he is taken to be punished anyway.
Evenings and nights in the hospital are the worst. The ward is dark, foul, and airless. Men lie awake counting, remembering the past, or imagining freedom. Others whisper about former lives to which they will never return. In this atmosphere, Alexander feels both the dreariness of hospital confinement and its strange similarity to actual prison.
Late at night in the hospital ward, when most of the patients are asleep, Alexander overhears a whispered conversation between two men. One is Shishkov, a young civil convict from the tailor’s shop. Shishkov is excitable, weak, and despised by the others. The other is Cherevin, an older corrective-company soldier who seems to be a cold and self-important listener. He answers only occasionally. Shishkov, agitated and eager to tell his story, begins recounting the events that led to his imprisonment.
He describes the household of Ankudim Trofimych, a prosperous and respected old merchant who has an 18-year-old daughter, Akulka. Another man, Filka Morozov, once connected with the family, quarrels with Ankudim. He takes his share of money and goes on a long drunken spree. During this period, Filka begins spreading rumors that he has had sex with Akulka, publicly dishonoring her and ruining a proposed marriage with an older widower, Mikita Grigoryich. The family beats Akulka severely because of the scandal. Shishkov, meanwhile, is living in poverty with his mother and falling into drunkenness himself. Encouraged by his mother, who wants the marriage for money, he agrees to marry Akulka, though he also believes the rumors and bargains for cash from her family.
Filka continues to taunt Shishkov before and after the wedding, mocking him for marrying a disgraced woman. Shishkov goes into the marriage drunk and enters the bridal room prepared to beat Akulka with a whip. Instead, he discovers that she is innocent. Overcome, he falls to his knees and begs her forgiveness. For a short time, he is proud of his wife and of the marriage. However, Filka’s continued insults and suggestions that Akulka still belongs to him take a toll on Shishkov’s mind. Though Akulka remains guiltless, Shishkov starts beating her regularly, partly from wounded pride and partly from his inability to resist the shame he feels before others.
Later, Filka is hired as a substitute recruit and—before leaving to take on another man’s military service—publicly bows to Akulka and asks her forgiveness. She returns the bow and tells Shishkov afterward that she now loves Filka “more than the whole world” (219). That same day, Shishkov decides to kill her. The next morning, he takes her by cart into the woods on the pretense of going to their field. There, he orders her to get down, tells her to pray, seizes her by the hair, and cuts her throat with a knife. She does not die at once. He embraces her, weeps over her, and then panics. He leaves her and runs home, hiding in an old bathhouse until he is found and arrested that night, after Akulka is discovered dead.
When Shishkov finishes, Cherevin responds without emotion and turns at once to his own experience of beating his wife, treating the whole matter as ordinary.
With the coming of April and Holy Week, summer work gradually begins. The change of season strongly affects the prisoners. Bright sun and the smell of spring awaken an even sharper longing for freedom in the prisoners’ “fettered soul[s].” Alexander notices that quarrels become more frequent. At the same time, however, men fall into sudden silence, staring across the Irtysh toward the free Kirghiz steppe. The nearness of spring also recalls the escapee’s life, since runaways begin once more to slip into the forests and roads of Siberia and Russia. Even prisoners who have no real intention of escaping think about or remember past escapes. Alexander describes one old convict who spent his life running away, roaming widely across Russia and Siberia. In prison, he now sits quietly in the sun, humming to himself and feeding the prison dogs.
Spring affects Alexander no less painfully. He becomes more restless and more oppressed by prison, especially the hostility shown to him as a nobleman. He often looks through the prison fence at green grass and the widening blue sky. During Lent, he is included in one of the weekly groups sent to prepare for communion. These days please him, because the men are excused from work and marched under guard to church. Standing near the entrance among the shackled convicts, receiving alms from worshippers—and later taking communion—he feels a strange mixture of humiliation and consolation. At Easter, the same pattern returns as at Christmas: Official gifts, alms from the town, festive food, visits from the priest and authorities, and then drunkenness and idleness. Easter is more painful than Christmas because the long, bright day makes confinement feel still heavier.
Summer labor is much harder than winter labor. The prisoners are sent to engineering works, construction, workshops, painting, brickmaking, and brick carrying. The brickyard, several miles from the fortress, is considered the hardest assignment. Alexander sometimes works carrying bricks from the bank of the Irtysh up to a building site. Though the ropes cut his shoulders, he takes satisfaction in gaining physical strength that will help him with “living after prison” (227). He especially values the work on the riverbank, because there he can turn his back on the fortress and look out over the open steppe, the sky, distant yurts, and the free landscape beyond the prison world.
Evenings in summer are somewhat easier, though still full of agitation. Prisoners gather in the kitchen or yard to discuss rumors, to sing, and to argue. At this time, a rumor spreads that an important general from Petersburg is coming to inspect all Siberia. The prisoners become excited and fantasize that he may remove the major or even hear their complaints against him. Streets are leveled, fences painted, and the prison itself scrubbed and arranged for inspection. During this period, a convict named Lomov stabs Gavrilka with an awl during a quarrel over a woman. The wound is slight, but the major, who already hates the Lomov family, seizes the chance to pursue the case eagerly. Lomov is tried, receives an additional sentence, and is given 1,000 rods.
When the inspector finally arrives, the prison is ready. The prisoners are lined up in clean white clothing, and the major is in a state of extreme agitation. The general enters with a suite of officials, walks through the prison, glances at the barracks and kitchen, briefly asks about Alexander, and then leaves almost at once. Nothing changes, no complaints are heard, and the prisoners are left “in some perplexity” (236).
For Alexander, the similarities between the prison and hospital only serve to illustrate the terrible conditions of the prison camp, reflecting The Experience of Dehumanization and Dignity in Prison. While in treatment, Alexander occasionally finds a reassuring degree of humanity. Unlike the guards at the camp, the doctors and interns in the hospital are kind and compassionate. The medical staff recognize that some men simply want to escape the forced labor of the camps for a while. While they cannot commute the prisoners’ sentences, the doctors can offer what little help they can. The authorities want to work or flog the men regardless of their physical or mental health, while the medical staff demonstrate a commitment to treating even the most hardened of criminals. Their empathy and dedication to healing others form an important contrast with the degradation and severe physical punishments of prison life.
The prisoners’ enthusiasm for the Easter celebrations mirrors their excitement toward Christmas, reflecting how small moments of celebration and festivity continue to play key roles in maintaining the prisoners’ morale and sense of their human worth. The religious symbolism of the Easter holiday—associated with resurrection and spiritual rebirth—merges with the symbolism of the new life and warmth of spring to create an atmosphere of both restless longing and hope for the prisoners. While Alexander and many of the others feel their imprisonment more keenly at this time, the reminders of the wider world and sense of greater connection with the outside community momentarily lessen the isolation and nihilism the prisoners often feel. Such moments thus function as both literal events in the lives of the prisoners and figurative reminders that they are still a part of the human community, suggesting that hope and dignity are still possible.
If the compassion of the doctors affirms Alexander’s faith in humanity during his hospital stay, then the story of Akulka’s husband provides a counterpoint, invoking the wider issue of The Problem of Violence in Society in society. Alexander overhears the story of how a poor man killed his wife due to his belligerent jealousy, after she had endured a long campaign of sexual harassment and slander at the hands of another man. In the Introduction, the unnamed narrator notes that Alexander was also sentenced for killing his wife. The commonalities between Alexander, a nobleman, and Shishkov, a poor man, in their shared violent and controlling behavior toward women speaks to how certain forms of domination and abuse cross class boundaries. Cherevin’s unemotional response to Shishkov’s confession and casual recitation of his own violent abuse of his wife reinforces how widespread and normalized violence against women is. The text thus draws attention to how society, both within and outside of the prison, fosters a dangerously casual attitude toward violence and the oppression of others.
Part 2 also includes Alexander’s descriptions of actual labor in the prison camp, lending further insight into The Effects of Class Tensions in Russian Society. Alexander recognizes his own privilege in this regard: As a nobleman, he is often excused from the more difficult work. The other prisoners have internalized this class difference, and they actively dismiss his efforts to involve himself in the more physical aspects of the labor. Alexander, unused to such physical labor, is worn down by the work. Often, he is assigned more clerical duties to save him from the more punishing routines. This illustrates the extent to which class differences in broader Russian society echo through the prison camp. In spite of the harsh conditions, Alexander and his fellow nobles are still treated with more deference and consideration regardless of the severity of their crimes, speaking to a double standard within the Tsarist Russian penal system.



Unlock all 65 pages of this Study Guide
Get in-depth, chapter-by-chapter summaries and analysis from our literary experts.